Thief
Rogue Theologian
I lean to cause and effect to sort that perspectiveI don't agree with Romans that god is somehow so obvious that atheists are just in denial.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I lean to cause and effect to sort that perspectiveI don't agree with Romans that god is somehow so obvious that atheists are just in denial.
Like Bob the builder I am now rather confused.
We believe in propositions, which are proposed (potential) information. What we will invest belief in must actually have that potential of informing us. It nets that, in part, from our biases, but also from the capacity for truth value that something (potential information) residing in our immediate sphere of awareness holds. Those are the things with the capacity to be assigned a truth value. Things unknown have no potential to inform unless they enter that sphere.I'm not talking about "rationalizing" belief. I'm just pointing out that when someone says "I disbelieve in gods", they mean something by the word "gods".
... and it generally isn't "the gods I've heard of and none others."
But those aren't what the person believes in. The person belives in their own immediately constructed world, not reconstructions of others' ideas.When someone says "I believe no gods exist", however they define "god", generally people recognize that the term might apply to god-concepts they haven't heard of.
Just acknowledging 'category' does that. Whether or not there are unknown samples, belief will stem only from what is immediate. Those are what have the potential to inform.Haven't you ever heard of "known unknowns"? A person can acknowledge the existence of a category without believing that their own experience is representative of the entire category.
So you think that someone who says "I don't believe in any gods" means "I don't believe in any of the gods I'm aware of" and not "I don't believe in any gods, whether I'm aware of them or not?"We believe in propositions, which are proposed (potential) information. What we will invest belief in must actually have that potential of informing us. It nets that, in part, from our biases, but also from the capacity for truth value that something (potential information) residing in our immediate sphere of awareness holds. Those are the things with the capacity to be assigned a truth value. Things unknown have no potential to inform unless they enter that sphere.
But those aren't what the person believes in. The person belives in their own immediately constructed world, not reconstructions of others' ideas.
Just acknowledging 'category' does that. Whether or not there are unknown samples, belief will stem only from what is immediate. Those are what have the potential to inform.
No, that's just implied.So you think that someone who says "I don't believe in any gods" means "I don't believe in any of the gods I'm aware of"
That's usually what they mean....and not "I don't believe in any gods, whether I'm aware of them or not?"
No, I don't. It's common sense that when they say, "I don't believe in any gods, whether I'm aware of them or not," they include only actuals and not imagined god images.I hope you understand why I consider your position utter nonsense.
no...no...no....Cause and effect, Rick... Bob can't build a house without bricks. The bricks must have come first.
Cause and effect, Rick... Bob can't build a house without bricks. The bricks must have come first.
As long as Bob has the potential to be neither theist nor atheist, I applaude his worldview.I mean Bob doesn't know whether he's an atheist, it must be terribly confusing for the poor chap.
What is an immediately constructed world if not something imparted upon us by others?But those aren't what the person believes in. The person belives in their own immediately constructed world, not reconstructions of others' ideas.
If Bob thinks, therefore he is... But Bob might possibly be an atheist... does Bob cease to exist, since Bob is God?I mean Bob doesn't know whether he's an atheist, it must be terribly confusing for the poor chap.
If "others" includes everything in the world, then no there isn't, because those others inherently taught me "external".What is an immediately constructed world if not something imparted upon us by others?
Is there any concept in your mind that wasn't somehow influenced or taught to you by external sources?
.
nay.....Bob is smart enough to say ....I AM!If Bob thinks, therefore he is... But Bob might possibly be an atheist... does Bob cease to exist, since Bob is God?
Bob's disbelief in Bob has rendered all atheistic arguments 100% valid.
Checkmate, Thief.
oh please....