Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Debate if you want, but that thread already is going. I'm investigating if Socioemotional Selectivity Theory (or it's sibling) can apply here as well to beliefs. The question is; do you believe that consciousness is caused by the brain or is not (please pick a side) and what age group do you fit into.
What can you provide as factual, compelling reasons for me to assume that there is an supernatural cause?
How is that not evidence?
Subjective knowledge is ... well, depending on your philosophical presuppositions, it is either exceedingly difficult or impossible to gain objectinve knowledge from someone else's subjective experience. I can tell you I saw a vision of dancing pink unicorns, but without more substantial evidence to my claim, you would not be at all unjustified in wondering if my "dancing pink unicorns" may have come out of a bottle.
No! More precisely, I do not know if my mind is (a) the presence of a non-physical "soul" interacting with the matter of by brain, (b) a natural product of the material of my brain with no outside influence, (c) some combination of a and b, or (d) something else entirely.Welcome to the problem of other minds. But are you not sure your own exists?
If by non-physical you mean outside the realm of physics then no. Thats why I hesitate to use terms like non-physical and non-material cause it doesnt mean anything. Like calling spirit nothing.It is. Evidence that there is something that exists called consciousness that is non-physical in nature. It's more than just evidence; it's a fact.
No! More precisely, I do not know if my mind is (a) the presence of a non-physical "soul" interacting with the matter of by brain, (b) a natural product of the material of my brain with no outside influence, (c) some combination of a and b, or (d) something else entirely.
If by non-physical you mean outside the realm of physics then no. Thats why I hesitate to use terms like non-physical and non-material cause it doesnt mean anything. Like calling spirit nothing.
Well if you are not conscious I wouldn't sweat it. You won't know anything anyway
Since I do not have a good definition for "conscious," in part because I do not know where it comes from, my answer remains the same. If we can find out what consciousness is, then I'll be able to answer that question.I did not ask you if you knew where your consciousness came from. I asked you if you were sure if you were in fact conscious.
Know anything? Heck, Nazz, most days I don't even _suspect_ anything.
Since I do not have a good definition for "conscious," in part because I do not know where it comes from, my answer remains the same. If we can find out what consciousness is, then I'll be able to answer that question.
Of course ... but then, so do my pets. Are they conscious?Then let me rephrase. Do you think you ever experience anything?
Of course ... but then, so do my pets. Are they conscious?
Well give me a jingle if physicists ever discover any consciousness out there
You have to talk to biologists, there are tons of species that exhibit it.
Someone had to be first.
Mythical or not.
You could have said .....metaphorical.
Bu that would not explain Man's divergence from the Day Six version.
Something happened....garden style.
I blame God.
Now, Monk, for shame--isn't it rude to answer a question with a question?
Wait ... Did I just ... oops.
More seriously, I do not actually propose that any such phenomenon actually exists. What I did was ask you _if_ such a phenomenon does exist, how would we discover it?
SomeTHING