• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

BRICS

Do you think BRICS is a force for positive economic and political change for developing countries?

  • No

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Indifferent

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • What is BRICS?

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    7

Jayhawker Soule

-- untitled --
Premium Member
It would not have taken all that much forethought to have included something akin to
  • an obvious potential force for both positive and negative economic and political change
 

Estro Felino

Believer in free will
Premium Member
The world is multipolar, not unipolar.

There is a banking cabal :rolleyes:
that wants a unipolar world.

It's good that certain countries safeguard their own national interests against this gang.
 

Samael_Khan

Qigong / Yang Style Taijiquan / 7 Star Mantis
Unipolar is a world totally controlled by one world power.

Multipolar means that there are several economic areas or poles of economic power.
That respect each other but are equals.
So is it like one world power with one culture and one set of values?
 

wellwisher

Well-Known Member
Hi guys,

I would like to know what your opinions are on BRICS.
These countries; Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, plus some others, are among the most polluting countries, since they are larger and emerging; billions of people, and are taking a faster track, less self burdened by cumbersome regulations, that the West imposes on itself. Some are also predators to poor nations with resources. For example, China is in Africa, bribing corruptible leaders, to exploit their mineral resources. China is not as mineral rich as Brazil or Russia.

BRICS will do fine, but smaller nations may stall, since to build them up, would mean more competition. This happened to the USA, when they rebuilt the world after WWII. China became a big dog only after they were allowed to run with the other Western big dogs; US, Europe and Japan. Now the China is very strong, more protectionist and not wanting to reciprocate; what goes around, comes around.

I am not too worried in the immediate future due to the Trump Presidency. I would been more worried if Harris had won. She would be plowed over and led down the wrong path. She may be a good lawyer but this is business. She cannot just regulate and litigate away other sovereign nations, but would have to compete to win, with her not qualified, in that field, at that level.

South Africa is interesting being a sophisticated country, in the last exploited continent. Elon Musk came from there. Musk is the first African American to be head of DOGE. His partner Vivek is Indian American. Good thing they are Patriots and not Globalists.

The need for BRICS is connected to the US dollar and the US national debt. BRICS wants a second world currency. The US dollar, by being the world currency of trade, has an impact on the value of other counties' currencies; trade and costs. The US is able to get away with even huge national debt, since the dollar is too big to fail. If it did, the rest also fail. The rest of the world wants to get out of this single currency, since the Swamp and Left are problem; environmental globalism adding $1 trillion/year debt. Hopefully, efficiency in the US Government, will help reverse the trend and common sense will reign again.
 
Top