Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I worked with tai chi master Daniel Lee for a number of years. Dan was Black Belt Magazine's Man of year back in the 80s. No slouch.what do you think?
Not much faking it, but lots of discipline.
bruce lee over-hyped? Yes and no...he is certainly over sold by many who are not JKD folks or pretending to be JKD folks or are kinda sorta JKD Folks. Not a whole lot of hype from actual JKD Folks though.
I trained his style JKD, briefly, in the Jerry Poteet line and it is real, it is aggressive and those guys know how to fight. Is the most awesome, best martial art in the land....no...but then no martial art is. I have trained a lot of different styles over the years and if I were a younger man with less infirmities I would train JKD. Using drills it is an easy and quick way to learn how to defend yourself effectively. But with that said there are most definitely 2 sides of the JKD fence from Bruce's first generation students. Those that believe they should teach exactly what Bruce taught them (Jerry Poteet for example) and those that feel that they should teach based more on JKD philosophy of take what is useful and discard what is not (the Dan Inosanto side of the fence). IMO neither side is better than the other, it is just what you want to learn and what your take is on JKD. For me, I preferred the what Bruce Lee actually taught side of the fence.
that legend of a stand off......the one where Lee got hurtbruce lee over-hyped? Yes and no...he is certainly over sold by many who are not JKD folks or pretending to be JKD folks or are kinda sorta JKD Folks. Not a whole lot of hype from actual JKD Folks though.
I trained his style JKD, briefly, in the Jerry Poteet line and it is real, it is aggressive and those guys know how to fight. Is the most awesome, best martial art in the land....no...but then no martial art is. I have trained a lot of different styles over the years and if I were a younger man with less infirmities I would train JKD. Using drills it is an easy and quick way to learn how to defend yourself effectively. But with that said there are most definitely 2 sides of the JKD fence from Bruce's first generation students. Those that believe they should teach exactly what Bruce taught them (Jerry Poteet for example) and those that feel that they should teach based more on JKD philosophy of take what is useful and discard what is not (the Dan Inosanto side of the fence). IMO neither side is better than the other, it is just what you want to learn and what your take is on JKD. For me, I preferred the what Bruce Lee actually taught side of the fence.
Now compare him to Stan Lee.
Stan Lee rules.Now compare him to Stan Lee.
that legend of a stand off......the one where Lee got hurt
that event caused a change in his style
the story i got.....the local orientals did not approve of the art taught to (Chinese derogatory)
they sent a champion to shut down Lee's teaching
the fight lasted 3minutes
afterward he decided the classic moves were too 'round about'
not direct enough
hence Jeet Kune Do
but I say.....his son Brandon
carried the art sooooooo very well
(I think the movie was called Rapid Fire)
Not Bruce Lee.Not much faking it, but lots of discipline.
Much better.
Stan Lee
Bruce Lee
And just cause you asked so nicely...a bonus....Tommy Lee
And Robert E Lee
I shady parts of (town).....and pick fights with other young men “in order to practice his fighting skills”.
Yes in much of the legendary lore built-up around Lee.what do you think?