That's why people are going crazy, attacking people at our nation's capitol, and so forth because BOTH pro/anti vaccine, mask, and all are fighting, cursing, and arguing with each other as if these attitudes somehow are more affective in helping the people suffering from COVID... its counterproductive. The whole debate is ridiculous; and, media, internet, fear, and confirmed bias are just making it worse.
It is coercion, by definition. It means that if you don't do X, you can't do Y; and, you get punished if you do Y, if you don't do X... it's literally placing a guilt trip no matter how justified on people to where their decisions are "said" to be causing people to be in danger.
That assumes you have an inherent right to do "Y". In this case Y is entering someone's private business. That's not an inherent right.
Do you feel the same way when you are required to wear a shirt and shoes in a restaurant?
Do you feel the same way when you are required not to drink and then hop into a car and drive?
So, basically, some of you guys are saying that if they don't don't take the vaccine, wear masks, etc... you ARE putting people in danger. That's ridiculous.
You are.
Businesses can do whatever they want to do.
That does not mean I agree with it.
You don't have to. You also don't have a right to enter any particular business no matter what.
Well, some businesses are more relaxed about masks, but since vaccine and vaccine passports may work more efficiently than masks, it would probably be more enforced either by choice of the business and/or its required of them.
You're attacking me for disagreeing with a policy that may be put in place. It has nothing to do with my desires and I am not a trump fan.
Disagree with vaccines does not mean anti-vaccine. Too much politics in your statements. I'm just sharing an opinion.
I haven't mentioned a single thing about politics.
Politics has zero to do with any of this.
I'm not attacking you. I'm having a conversation with you. You seem to think you have rights that you actually don't.
I don't compare the two. Pandemic vs. shirt/shoe policy?
Perhaps you should start thinking about it.
You're making my opinion into an argument. If you got my point, I'm glad.
But no. I still disagree with needing vaccine passports to go buy groceries, to the bank, to the gym, to go to the bar, and so forth.
It doesn't matter what I like. Opinions can't change anything. I'm not an activist and never been political. So, stop the accusations.
Sorry, what accusations?
But masks is just material. I went into a store without a mask because I forgot it. The manager didn't shove me out of the store. I bought a new mask in the store and left out with it on.
They're
just material that contain the moist droplets that come out of your mouth and nose when you talk, cough, sneeze, etc. Which is how COVID is spread.
Why don't you tell surgeons, nurses and doctors that they're "just material" so why bother wearing them at all?
I have a huge feeling it won't be that simple with vaccine passports. It's going to be a mess.
Yes. I know. No one is saying that everyone else should not get the vaccine.
If you want to force it on everyone, that's you. Not all people will agree to that. To turn this around, your opinions don't change anything-you just the majority on your side.
Again, there is no forcing going on.
You got my point?
You got my point?
I don't think I did, no.
It's just silly. I can't imagine you guys tell unvaccinated people to stay at home and order out... good luck on you. That's more than just an opinion, Skeptic.
But I get your point.
It's not silly. We're in the middle of a public health emergency.
When they have to do with the pandemic and medicine and treatments and such, comparing it to masks/shoes/etc is really pushing it.
Why do you think so?
"Forcing" customers to wear shoes and shirts is a matter of health, cleanliness and safety.
The pandemic is definitely a matter of health, cleanliness and safety.
Did you know if you want to travel to certain countries, you first have to show proof that you've been vaccinated for specific illnesses or they won't let you in?
That's been the case for decades now. Do you think peoples' rights are being infringed in that case? I'd be curious to hear why or why not.
Please re-read my post. I said "not pushed or shoved," it's coercion.
Please elaborate.
In my observation, you only value peoples' rights when they agree with your opinions.
I disagree. And I'm not sure this addresses what I said, which was, "I too, value peoples' right to choose what is medically best for their well being. I also value the rights of others who choose not to endanger their staff and customers by potentially exposing them to a highly transmissible/deadly/damaging virus in their place of business."
I'm still wondering what "rights" you have here that are being trampled?
Another RF member mentioned that. But my point is I wouldn't be surprised if people like many on RF don't mind separating vaccinated from unvaccinated and throwing them off to the wolves.
RF is kind of giving me a sense of what people think when I walk by them. It's an interesting observation but I hope it doesn't turn dangerous in person.
Don't know about "because dogs aren't allowed in stores" comment and how that relates.
That's what I heard yesterday... they were comparing it to the Nazi thing. I was going to do a thread on it, but it was too sensitive a topic.
Everyone tries to compare everything to Nazi things. I don't see how it's related.