• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

By the way -- if you claim to be a Christian...

2ndpillar

Well-Known Member
Sounds like paranoid exaggerated nonsense to me.

You know if you want to get like a law degree or a medical degree, you go to university, right? Why do you imagine everyone graduating from university is getting an interpretative dance degree? What a ridiculous statement.

Also, who cares what colour someone's hair is? Or if they have a nose ring? What's that got to do with anything at all?
Tattoos and a nose ring, along with blue hair indicates rebellion to parents that the children considered hypocrites, and ruin their lifes in the meantime. Being paranoid doesn't offset that the Progressives are howling at the moon and are often degrading their bodies to go along with their faltering minds. As for degrees, they are not all they are supposed to be. People go to the doctors and come out still sick. They go to the lawyers, and often come out broke and in jail. It is a piece of paper, that often isn't worth the paper it is written on. A perfect example is the D.A. Fanny from Georgia. A law degree with no character, morales, or insight. Or take a doctor by the name of Fauci, with no character, or morales, trained in the world of pharmaceutical nonsense.
1710884179778.png
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
Tattoos and a nose ring, along with blue hair indicates rebellion to parents that the children considered hypocrites, and ruin their lifes in the meantime. Being paranoid doesn't offset that the Progressives are howling at the moon and are often degrading their bodies to go along with their faltering minds. As for degrees, they are not all they are supposed to be. People go to the doctors and come out still sick. They go to the lawyers, and often come out broke and in jail. It is a piece of paper, that often isn't worth the paper it is written on. A perfect example is the D.A. Fanny from Georgia. A law degree with no character, morales, or insight. Or take a doctor by the name of Fauci, with no character, or morales, trained in the world of pharmaceutical nonsense.
View attachment 89606
That may have been the case 20 years ago. Now daughters might go back to who knows what since mom has blue hair and a nose ring.
 

2ndpillar

Well-Known Member
That may have been the case 20 years ago. Now daughters might go back to who knows what since mom has blue hair and a nose ring.
Older women with tattoos and nose ring don't come off looking good. It is hard for a young girl to come out looking good with piercings throughout their bodies. Having multiple tattoos is downright ugly. If they live to be in their 60s, it is going to get creepy.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
Older women with tattoos and nose ring don't come off looking good. It is hard for a young girl to come out looking good with piercings throughout their bodies. Having multiple tattoos is downright ugly. If they live to be in their 60s, it is going to get creepy.
I am not a fan of tattoos either. And they do definitely need some sort of touching up over the years. But with so many people sporting them I am very sure that a solution will be found.
 

SkepticThinker

Veteran Member
Tattoos and a nose ring, along with blue hair indicates rebellion to parents that the children considered hypocrites, and ruin their lifes in the meantime.
Says who? That's a lot of assumptions you've made there.
Being paranoid doesn't offset that the Progressives are howling at the moon and are often degrading their bodies to go along with their faltering minds.
Huh?
As for degrees, they are not all they are supposed to be. People go to the doctors and come out still sick. They go to the lawyers, and often come out broke and in jail. It is a piece of paper, that often isn't worth the paper it is written on. A perfect example is the D.A. Fanny from Georgia. A law degree with no character, morales, or insight. Or take a doctor by the name of Fauci, with no character, or morales, trained in the world of pharmaceutical nonsense.
View attachment 89606
There you have it folks: Medical degrees are useless because .... people still come out of the doctor's office sick.
Law degrees are useless because ... people come out broke and in jail.

Cool beans, bro. Next time you need surgery, I suggest consulting a random internet stranger with no degree in anything. Let me know how that goes!
 

SkepticThinker

Veteran Member
Older women with tattoos and nose ring don't come off looking good. It is hard for a young girl to come out looking good with piercings throughout their bodies. Having multiple tattoos is downright ugly. If they live to be in their 60s, it is going to get creepy.
I'm sure they're all dying inside at the thought that 2ndpillar doesn't think they look good.
 

2ndpillar

Well-Known Member
I'm sure they're all dying inside at the thought that 2ndpillar doesn't think they look good.
I don't know, if you think 60+ year highly tattooed old women, in general, look good, I am thinking you are already pierced and tattooed, and hoping people might find you attractive. It isn't happening. You should be more skeptical of what you think people might think. I think that a tattooed tear drops is often a sign you killed someone. Informative, but not attractive.
 

SkepticThinker

Veteran Member
I don't know, if you think 60+ year highly tattooed old women, in general, look good, I am thinking you are already pierced and tattooed, and hoping people might find you attractive. It isn't happening. You should be more skeptical of what you think people might think. I think that a tattooed tear drops is often a sign you killed someone. Informative, but not attractive.
I think if people are happy with themselves, then who I am to say they shouldn't be. I'm not into judging and demeaning others on how they choose to decorate and present themselves. What I care about is the content of peoples' character.

I got my ears pierced when I was eight years old because I thought it was neat.
I have three tattoos. I didn't get them to impress you, or anyone else. I didn't get them so people would find me attractive. (In fact, I wish less people would find me attractive so I can be left alone and not hit on every time I leave the damn house.) I got them to commemorate my lost loved ones. I don't give a rat's derriere if you find them attractive or not. They're not for you. They're for me. You can tell me I'm ugly with them all day long - I really don't care.

Stop judging others based on your own bogus assumptions. It's icky.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
I think if people are happy with themselves, then who I am to say they shouldn't be. I'm not into judging and demeaning others on how they choose to decorate and present themselves. What I care about is the content of peoples' character.

I got my ears pierced when I was eight years old because I thought it was neat.
I have three tattoos. I didn't get them to impress you, or anyone else. I didn't get them so people would find me attractive. (In fact, I wish less people would find me attractive so I can be left alone and not hit on every time I leave the damn house.) I got them to commemorate my lost loved ones. I don't give a rat's derriere if you find them attractive or not. They're not for you. They're for me. You can tell me I'm ugly with them all day long - I really don't care.

Stop judging others based on your own bogus assumptions. It's icky.
The only one that I have problems with are nose rings. I grew up on a farm and know how they can be very useful. But I do not think that any females with a nose ring would appreciate me applying that knowledge.
 

SkepticThinker

Veteran Member
The only one that I have problems with are nose rings. I grew up on a farm and know how they can be very useful. But I do not think that any females with a nose ring would appreciate me applying that knowledge.
LOL Maybe not. :D

My problem with nose rings is that when I look at someone who has one, it causes my eyes to water and I get an insane urge to sneeze.
 

It Aint Necessarily So

Veteran Member
Premium Member
I don't know, if you think 60+ year highly tattooed old women, in general, look good, I am thinking you are already pierced and tattooed, and hoping people might find you attractive. It isn't happening. You should be more skeptical of what you think people might think.
Do you think misogyny ("I doubt that giving women the right to vote has worked out. Apparently, women are easily deceived") and conspiracy theories make a person attractive? How about zealous, angry religiosity?

I'm assuming that 2ndpillar refers to Islam's five pillars. The Swiss use the term as well, but for them, it's not about religion: 2nd pillar
 

jimb

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
Older women with tattoos and nose ring don't come off looking good. It is hard for a young girl to come out looking good with piercings throughout their bodies. Having multiple tattoos is downright ugly. If they live to be in their 60s, it is going to get creepy.

That is just your opinion. One person's opinion doesn't really mean much, especially when it's negative.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
LOL Maybe not. :D

My problem with nose rings is that when I look at someone who has one, it causes my eyes to water and I get an insane urge to sneeze.
LOL! Then you know how they can be used too. But again, personal tastes vary with every generation. Tattoos may be here to stay, they may be a passing trend that will once be a minority fashion trend. I have found it is wise to not get too wound up about someone's personal preferences. As long as I am not forced to go along it is fine. Nor will I force them to go along with my tastes.
 

2ndpillar

Well-Known Member
That is just your opinion. One person's opinion doesn't really mean much, especially when it's negative.
It depends of the person. The opinion of the Woke Progressive Biden has no relevance to reality. On the other hand, apart from the X and Z generations, I don't think in general, anyone thinks tattoos or piercings are nice to look, except for a drunken sailor, who often has both.
 

2ndpillar

Well-Known Member
Do you think misogyny ("I doubt that giving women the right to vote has worked out. Apparently, women are easily deceived") and conspiracy theories make a person attractive? How about zealous, angry religiosity?

I'm assuming that 2ndpillar refers to Islam's five pillars. The Swiss use the term as well, but for them, it's not about religion: 2nd pillar
I don't know, you may be on to something. Who is supporting the idiot Biden? Is it women? Is it because they are easily deceived, or is that many of them are married to the government, and Biden is their sugar daddy? As for the soccer moms who vote for the idiot, well, apparently, they were deceived during their stay in the Woke Progressive Universities and think the man is empathetic. Of course he is empathetic to the accumulative wealth of his family. As for the 2nd pillar of the Swiss, I don't support any profession. And the religion of the Swiss, is money, and their 3 pillars are about money. As for the pillars of Islam, I think the Koran only requires 3 of them, and the rest are just thrown in for someone's amusement. While the Koran mentions Becca once, the "gathering place", it doesn't mention Mecca, for the "gathering place"/Becca, at the time was at Petra, not Mecca, in which Mecca was not even on any map at the supposed time of Muhammad, whose storyline was fabricated over a hundred years after his supposed murder by a women. So, you see, women would have a role, if that story was actually true. The Islamic narratives were written mostly be Persians, over a hundred years after the supposed death of Muhammad, and written mostly in Persia, not Mecca. No one who made up the Islamic narrative was alive at the time of this Muhammad guy. They don't even have a uniform Koran, but around 100 versions, with around 93,000 discrepancies, all written at least 100 years after his supposed death. As for "religions", I decry all religions, including the religion of Marx, and his socialist comrades. As for the term "pillar", that refers to those who overcome (Rev 3:12), with respect to the church of Philadelphia. Soloman's Temple had two pillars (Jachin (establish) & Boaz (strength)).
 

jimb

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
It depends of the person. The opinion of the Woke Progressive Biden has no relevance to reality. On the other hand, apart from the X and Z generations, I don't think in general, anyone thinks tattoos or piercings are nice to look, except for a drunken sailor, who often has both.

I stopped reading at "Woke Progressive Bide", as there is no point in reading the rest of your obviously-biased message. P.S. Do you even know what "woke" means?
 

SkepticThinker

Veteran Member
I don't know, you may be on to something. Who is supporting the idiot Biden? Is it women? Is it because they are easily deceived, or is that many of them are married to the government, and Biden is their sugar daddy?
What??

Perhaps it's the people who can't bring themselves to vote for a civilly liable sexual abuser and a convicted fraud.
As for the soccer moms who vote for the idiot, well, apparently, they were deceived during their stay in the Woke Progressive Universities and think the man is empathetic.
Cool, so soccer moms, people with tattoos, people with piercings, people who attended university, and easily deceived women are all woke idiots to you. Did I miss anyone?

What is "woke" anyway, in your opinion? It sounds like it means people you disagree with.

Of course he is empathetic to the accumulative wealth of his family. As for the 2nd pillar of the Swiss, I don't support any profession. And the religion of the Swiss, is money, and their 3 pillars are about money. As for the pillars of Islam, I think the Koran only requires 3 of them, and the rest are just thrown in for someone's amusement. While the Koran mentions Becca once, the "gathering place", it doesn't mention Mecca, for the "gathering place"/Becca, at the time was at Petra, not Mecca, in which Mecca was not even on any map at the supposed time of Muhammad, whose storyline was fabricated over a hundred years after his supposed murder by a women. So, you see, women would have a role, if that story was actually true. The Islamic narratives were written mostly be Persians, over a hundred years after the supposed death of Muhammad, and written mostly in Persia, not Mecca. No one who made up the Islamic narrative was alive at the time of this Muhammad guy. They don't even have a uniform Koran, but around 100 versions, with around 93,000 discrepancies, all written at least 100 years after his supposed death. As for "religions", I decry all religions, including the religion of Marx, and his socialist comrades. As for the term "pillar", that refers to those who overcome (Rev 3:12), with respect to the church of Philadelphia. Soloman's Temple had two pillars (Jachin (establish) & Boaz (strength)).
This just looks like word salad to me.
 

2ndpillar

Well-Known Member
Perhaps it's the people who can't bring themselves to vote for a civilly liable sexual abuser and a convicted fraud.
Yeah, it is better to strong arm China and Ukraine for millions, then to have a New York court convict someone of a made-up encounter by a feminist/sex writer, 20 years after the fact. As you judge others, so shall you be judged. You might consider getting rid of your Progressive news outlet subscriptions.
 

SkepticThinker

Veteran Member
Yeah, it is better to strong arm China and Ukraine for millions, then to have a New York court convict someone of a made-up encounter by a feminist/sex writer, 20 years after the fact.
Nope, it actually happened. Trump was found civilly liable for sexual abuse and defamation in a court of law by a judge and jury.
You don't get to just claim it's made up when there's a conviction.

So you're fine supporting a civilly liable sexual abuser. Ick.

Meanwhile, you believe Biden has taken millions form China and Ukraine based on zero evidence. The Republicans literally have no case at this point. No evidence. No nothing. But you think he's guilty anyway. While at the same time, pretending that a guy who was actually found liable, actually wasn't. How do you deal with such cognitive dissonance?
As you judge others, so shall you be judged.
I don't sexually abuse people, so I'm good.

I'm fine judging people who have been found liable for sexual abuse. I have no problem at all with it. Why don't you?
You might consider getting rid of your Progressive news outlet subscriptions.
LOL sounds like projection to me, given what you've said above. Lay off the Fox "News." They're known liars.
 
Top