outhouse
Atheistically
Noah had 3 sons. Shem, Ham & Japheth.
.
Mythology
They never existed.
There was no flood, and no Noah
Thanks for playing :slap:
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Noah had 3 sons. Shem, Ham & Japheth.
.
Mythology
They never existed.
There was no flood, and no Noah
Thanks for playing :slap:
Well your wrong
Its why you never have evidence for your mythology
mythology has never said anything.
and you cannot prove anything at all outside mythology
While I can prove what is stated in genesis is factual mythology.
You mean read it in a post hoc manner fitting verses into scientific explanation? Sure if you want to use fallacious reasoning go ahead but you are not going to convince people that can critically think.
Very good. Humans originated in East or Southern Africa to the best of our knowledge. If Adam and Eve are traceable to SE Turkey about 9,000 BC, then The Adam of Gen 1 (which refers to both male(s) and female(s)) must be a separate event. It is just our interpretation that make the two refer to the same person. In Gen 2:4, the Bible indicates that there might be many generations between Gen 1 and Gen 2. Thus I don't have a single objection to what you say, and I still stand by my statements.
if the hebrews evolved from the canaanites, they would have spoke the language of the canaanites.... but they dont.
They spoke and wrote in hebrew because they did not originate with the sons of Ham...they originated with Shem's sons.
But of course you could be right... perhaps all humans are mythological creatures. Now there's a thought.
I believe All reading of history is post hoc. I don't see why understanding what was going on from a scientific point of view is any less reasonable than a magical point of view.
I have no desire to do so and wish to be corrected if I do.
I believe critical thinking can be useful but if all the person is doing is saying "nah it aint" then it isn't.
I believe I didn'tr sayanything about mythology .
Hebrew is based on Canaanite, it is part of the Canaanite language family of the wester semitic grouping... Hebrew is based on the proto-Canaanite alphabet which is the basis for all languages in the grouping. The early Hebrew language uses paleo-Hebrew alphabet which was is based on the Phoenician alphabet which agains is part of the Canaanite language grouping. Aramaic alphabets were not used until the 5th century. The oldest record of Hebrew found uses the proto-Canaanite alphabet. You have should not talk about a subject which you are ignorant of..
Outhouse is claiming the isrealites are canaanites which is quite wrong
the language they spoke which is different to the canaanite language.
You are factually wrong pegg, thanks for playing
One reason is because I am not claiming that, all education and knowledge is claiming it.
I just follow the education you refuse.
wrong again
Canaanite languages - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The Canaanite languages are a subfamily of the Semitic languages, which were spoken by the ancient peoples of the Canaan region, the Canaanites (including the Israelites and Phoenicians), Amorites, Ammonites, Moabites and Edomites. All of them seem to have become extinct as native languages by the early 1st millennium CE
Jews still speak Hebrew.
Canaanite is a semitic language.... Shem had a brother called Ham and Canaan was one of his sons.
So of course they are related, but that does not mean that the sons of Shem came from the Sons of Canaan.
They are two different stocks of people and developed into two different nations of people.
Outhouse is claiming the isrealites are canaanites which is quite wrong and which is proved wrong by the language they spoke which is different to the canaanite language.
Both being semitic does not mean they are from the same clan.
He is right. You read the Bible while I work in archeology with my specialty in Biblical archeology. Early Hebrew uses the Canaanite alphabet as well as Phoenician a century later. It is a splinter language as Spanish, Italian and French are to Latin. Read Prof. Yosef Garfinkel work or History of the Hebrew Language By David Steinberg. Canaanite languages share a rate of same word meaning of 79 to 85%. If I say X word in Hebrew it means the same in Phoenician.
But outhouse is claiming that this means the Hebrews are actually canaanites.
like the Canaanite faith from which it evolved