I don't really care and have not read more than the first sentence of this post, the fact is you are using ad hominem to excuse responding to my post
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Can I have both?
- Thread starter Jeremiah Ames
- Start date
I don't really care and have not read more than the first sentence of this post, the fact is you are using ad hominem to excuse responding to my post
ThePainefulTruth
Romantic-Cynic
I have not rejected your evidence against my argument. Because you have provided no evidence to counter the 6th day argument. Nor have you provided a reasonable argument to account for Cain and Seth's wife.
I provided the 6th day account from the bible.
You are the one making extraordinary claims for Cain's wife, it is not up to me to argue your cause for you.
It's not an extraordinary claim because the scripture says he got married and had children. This is cited in post #71. Also listed is my argument she is an ancestor of 6th day creation. You have not refuted that at all. Or provided a reasonable explanation as to where this mysterious woman came from. My argument stands until you can provide evidence she is one of Adam and Eves children since you claim Adam and Eve is the first humans. Which you cannot.
You lost get over it!
The bible mentions no other human other than adam on day 6, anything more is made up apologetics.
A week or so ago i have provided a link to the ongoing discussion regarding the mystery of Cains wifes ancestry. If after a couple of thousand years, biblical scholars cannot find a solution to the mystery then i would love to know the source of your information.
You keep harping back to post #71, which in no way validates your claims of cains wifes ancestry. What is does is list various bible verses followed buy your personal interpretation.
Ahh, at least now you are admitting a mystery. So we are getting somewhere further than you simply making unfounded claims.
Where does it say Adam?
Genesis 1: 26-28
26 And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth
27 So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.
28 And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth.
The word man is commonly used for mankind or humankind as cited here. This was on the 6th day.
Adam and Eve we're not create until after the 7th day.
Man (word) - Wikipedia
Thats easy see Genesis 1: 26-28 above.
It's only a mystery to you. Because you cannot fathom it.
Man, not men,not humanity but man
Commonly interpreted. Only in apologetics does man (singular) equate to mankind because it fills a gap
There is no fathoming (interpretation of the gaps) required
And you still have not provided cains wifes ancestry.
I'll link it for you again since your having trouble comprehending the English language. Man (word) - Wikipedia
Also Genesis 1:27 clearly states that man and woman were made that day in his image.
27 So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.
Man means humanity here. Not a singular man. It is clearly stated.
Then he rested for a day. Then He created Adam and Eve separately.
No, thats just crap your making up because your losing the argument.
I did Genesis 1:26-28
She came from the 6th day creations.
Where is your evidence she was created with Adam and Eve?
Yes we can all use Wikipedia
Adam - Wikipedia
Your interpretation is not my problem
No i am not losing anything, im not the one making crap up by adding bullpoop to the gaps in the Bible.
I have cited scripture to back my argument of what the Bible claims.
You have not.
This discussion is over.
You have cited scripture that does not have anything to do with backing your argument but added your own interpretation.
Yes i have, i cited Genesis 1:26... Which nowhere makes claims of a female of different dna.
But if you have run out of your nonsense then fair enough, its been fun.
I was correct, that you ignored is not my problem.
Actually i am replying to your posts so who's trolling?
You are trolling because you refuse to adhere to the rules of debate. You are not even trying to refute my argument. I have citations for my claim on post #71. Which you refuse to address.
Now whos trolling
I have refuted your argument at day 1, since then you have moved the goalposts and refused to acknowledge my argument and have been trolling me with extraordinary claims, not mentioned in the bible and you claim I'm not following the rules of debate... Projection
I have addresses your post #71 3 times so please don't lie, the fact you don't like my comments and refuse to acknowledge them also illustrates your projection.
How pathetic, just be a brave loser and stop bothering me.
That would be you. Here is the proof:
Name calling doesn't help your case.
Ignored
Troll ignored