Can religion reject this science ?

[ChristineM]

A Nasa opinion is not any sort of evidence ! You haven't provided any evidence that space can be destroyed or created !

Be honest , do you know of anyway to destroy space ?

That's a direct question , let's see if you can answer it honestly without the ''charades'' or ''dressing'' it up as something else !

In the past i have provided perimeter institute stuff, you ignored that to.

You ignore the worlds top cosmologists astrophysicists and astronomers and provide foot stomping idiocy in their place.

And keep your 1/ strawman, it is it irrelevant to your srguargu

Enjoy your life. Im done

 

[james blunt]

In the past i have provided perimeter institute stuff, you ignored that to.

You ignore the worlds top cosmologists astrophysicists and astronomers and provide foot stomping idiocy in their place.

Enjoy your life. Im done

Like I have said before , science always lose to me and that is why they always ban me ! You have failed to provide evidence , the truth is you have none. Most of your stuff is made up and as no actual proof . I know , I have asked for over a decade for proofs and I have shown science lots of errors in thinking . They always wish me good day and leave , no answer to simple questions .

1) Space cannot be created or destroyed

It would be illogical to suggest that space , which has no physicality , can be created or destroyed ! There is no observed evidence to suggest anything other than the proposed postulate . Even after a nuclear bomb test , when the cloud settles , the observed space remains unaltered although there will be increased radiation/energy levels , occupying that space .


Tell me I'm wrong science ? Lie !

 

[Workman]

i think today is a big confusion with religion and science are two in complete seperate beliefs! not knowing itself religion speaks through science in today.

 

[ChristineM]

Like I have said before , science always lose to me and that is why they always ban me ! You have failed to provide evidence , the truth is you have none. Most of your stuff is made up and as no actual proof . I know , I have asked for over a decade for proofs and I have shown science lots of errors in thinking . They always wish me good day and leave , no answer to simple questions .

1) Space cannot be created or destroyed

It would be illogical to suggest that space , which has no physicality , can be created or destroyed ! There is no observed evidence to suggest anything other than the proposed postulate . Even after a nuclear bomb test , when the cloud settles , the observed space remains unaltered although there will be increased radiation/energy levels , occupying that space .


Tell me I'm wrong science ? Lie !

Ignored

 

[james blunt]

i think today is a big confusion with religion and science are two in complete seperate beliefs! not knowing itself religion speaks through science in today.

I think education begins with understanding and not taking things out of proportion to the true meanings,

4.The meaning of maths and maths use dependencies and independences.

We must remember that numbers are the invention of logical rules by humans to aid our existence. Numbers do not exist in the Universe, they only exist in our mental interpretation of process by using number equivalents to explain and accurately fit and explain a process or event. The Universe exists without numbers and events happen regardless of the numbers involved. It is important that we understand that maths is not the answer to the Universe , it is a way to define a process or event in a different context other than words alone.

 

[Workman]

I think education begins with understanding and not taking things out of proportion to the true meanings,

4.The meaning of maths and maths use dependencies and independences.

We must remember that numbers are the invention of logical rules by humans to aid our existence. Numbers do not exist in the Universe, they only exist in our mental interpretation of process by using number equivalents to explain and accurately fit and explain a process or event. The Universe exists without numbers and events happen regardless of the numbers involved. It is important that we understand that maths is not the answer to the Universe , it is a way to define a process or event in a different context other than words alone.

Nice very nice! I’ve always thought the same just didn’t have someone to share with

 

[james blunt]

Nice very nice! I’ve always thought the same just didn’t have someone to share with

It is quite surprising that some people think and act as if numbers are in some way magical when they're not ''all that'' .
It is nice to meet somebody who thinks of numbers in the same way !

I have you a question , can you think of anyway to destroy space ?

 

[ChristineM]

I think education begins with understanding and not taking things out of proportion to the true meanings,

4.The meaning of maths and maths use dependencies and independences.

We must remember that numbers are the invention of logical rules by humans to aid our existence. Numbers do not exist in the Universe, they only exist in our mental interpretation of process by using number equivalents to explain and accurately fit and explain a process or event. The Universe exists without numbers and events happen regardless of the numbers involved. It is important that we understand that maths is not the answer to the Universe , it is a way to define a process or event in a different context other than words alone.

Ignored

 

[Workman]

Do you have any theries of colours, colours is a big thing in today where most do

It is quite surprising that some people think and act as if numbers are in some way magical when they're not ''all that'' .
It is nice to meet somebody who thinks of numbers in the same way !

I have you a question , can you think of anyway to destroy space ?

i think infinite and divine can?

 

[Workman]

sorry I meant infinite destroys time

 

[Workman]

Would have to be a light of carrying not with it

 

[Prestor John]

It does me after experiencing science forums for over a decade ! You can't argue they have errors and may be incorrect in several areas . Well to be honest they are pretty clueless to reality and I even think some of them are science belief extremists .

Like Bill Nye the...Not So Science Guy!

 

[Subduction Zone]

Like Bill Nye the...Not So Science Guy!

What has Bill Nye done that is not scientific?

 

[Prestor John]

What has Bill Nye done that is not scientific?

He has a bachelors in in mechanical engineering. That's it.

He has no scientific credentials nor has he contributed any research to the scientific community.

 

[Subduction Zone]

He has a bachelors in in mechanical engineering. That's it.

He has no scientific credentials nor has he contributed any research to the scientific community.

So what? That does not mean that he cannot follow the scientific method. That is almost as bad as claiming that one has to be an ordained priest to be a Christian.I

He has helped educate and inspire thousands upon thousands young scientists that have contributed research to the scientific community. You sound jealous.

 

[ratiocinator]

Ok, I get it, you don’t agree with what’s going on, so then why do you give the respect to show you are still here? Go and be the same elsewhere or stay and know more, you can handle that can’t you or not! What harm will it do you!

This sort of things is kind of hilarious but a bit scary too. Clueless people who think they know better than scientists like Einstein are two a penny on discussion forums - and they really are rather funny. On the other hand, the kind of attitude that says that, despite having no relevant education or any knowledge of the subject, I know better than the experts, is potentially dangerous. It can lead to things like the anti-vaccination movement, which causes real human suffering and death.

 

[james blunt]

So what? That does not mean that he cannot follow the scientific method. That is almost as bad as claiming that one has to be an ordained priest to be a Christian.I

He has helped educate and inspire thousands upon thousands young scientists that have contributed research to the scientific community. You sound jealous.

So what ?

I have no credentials and I am treated like an idiot , so you should treat him like an idiot !

 

[james blunt]

This sort of things is kind of hilarious but a bit scary too. Clueless people who think they know better than scientists like Einstein are two a penny on discussion forums - and they really are rather funny. On the other hand, the kind of attitude that says that, despite having no relevant education or any knowledge of the subject, I know better than the experts, is potentially dangerous. It can lead to things like the anti-vaccination movement, which causes real human suffering and death.

I can demonstrate Albert's errors my dear chap ! The same as I demonstrate sciences errors .

How about I demonstrate that time does not slow down or speed up ?

 

[ratiocinator]

I can demonstrate Albert's errors my dear chap ! The same as I demonstrate sciences errors .

Go on then...

Oh, and posting word salad and assertions about space demonstrates nothing. A demonstration would mean either finding an inconsistency in the theories or making an exact, numerical prediction that differs from those of the theories and then doing an experiment that shows your prediction is correct (no, blowing up balloons and making assertions about it, doesn't count).

 

[james blunt]

Go on then...

Oh, and posting word salad and assertions about space demonstrates nothing. A demonstration would mean either finding an inconsistency in the theories or making an exact, numerical prediction that differs from those of the theories and then doing an experiment that shows your prediction is correct (no, blowing up balloons and making assertions about it, doesn't count).

Ok , I will demonstrate time does not slow down or speed up


.....0.5s

..........1.s

These two clocks start timing at the same time , the first clock ticks slower than the second clock .


Ok so far, do you understand that and the ''diagram'' ?