Can religion reject this science ?

[james blunt]

OK fair enough, posted for benefit of other readers only.

Just don't start correcting his algebra. Here's an example of what that can get one into: Algebra help . | Sciforums

A + B = A.B

What is wrong with that ?

Nothing ....

 

[Kangaroo Feathers]

The void space didn't create matter , matter manifested by a miracle of the void space . There is no other answer but that , it is a factual miracle . That is why the void space must be God because the void space is so special , it's magical , you can't destroy it , it doesn't age , it is everywhere , it is eternal .
As an amateur scientist , I respect the void space , it is brilliant , it is pure , it is everything that anything exists in . You couldn't design it ..

"Amateur scientist"? Please provide any scientific evidence for your claims in this post, amateur or otherwise?

 

[ratiocinator]

A + B = A.B

What is wrong with that ?

It's nonsense.

 

[james blunt]

You do not "see" space, as there is nothing to see. You can be aware of the absence, and the estimated void is present in your mental model, but you don't "see" the space. You see what's on the other side of the space. If you could see space, you wouldn't be able to see what was on the other side. Space is implicitly an absence, like a vacuum.

You almost understand it correctly but not quite ! You do see space , you are not blind if there is no objects to see in space , you endure an optical illusion and th transparent space looks opaque to you although it is not . You don't quite understand the nature of light but that is only because you only have your education to go by.

 

[james blunt]

"Amateur scientist"? Please provide any scientific evidence for your claims in this post, amateur or otherwise?

7 postulates I already provided .

Amateur because nobody will give me paid job .

 

[Kangaroo Feathers]

You almost understand it correctly but not quite ! You do see space , you are not blind if there is no objects to see in space , you endure an optical illusion and th transparent space looks opaque to you although it is not . You don't quite understand the nature of light but that is only because you only have your education to go by.

Uh-huh. Got any empirical evidence to back up these claims?

 

[Polymath257]

A + B = A.B

What is wrong with that ?

Nothing ....

Well, it perfectly shows your lack of understanding of basic math.

 

[ratiocinator]

7 postulates I already provided .

They aren't evidence, they are a set of assertions that are contradicted by evidence.

 

[Kangaroo Feathers]

7 postulates I already provided .

Are they as wrong as A+B = A x B?

 

[Polymath257]

7 postulates I already provided .

He asked for evidence. In other words, you need to prove your postulates are correct. And no, your intuition isn't proof enough.

And, of course, the facts are against you. We *know* that space is dynamically linked with matter. We *know* that it expands and can be curved. Your denials and counter-claims are irrelevant.

 

[james blunt]

It's nonsense.

A.B is a dot product of A + B

You are talking nonsense .


Additionally it is my equation , it is not my fault you don't know maths .

 

[Kangaroo Feathers]

Well, it perfectly shows your lack of understanding of basic math.

Algebra is a long time ago, but A.B is the same as A x B, right? So not the same as A + B where A and B aren't 1 or 0?

 

[Polymath257]

Are they as wrong as A+B = A x B?

Well, if B=A/(A-1), that *can* work. His other stuff just makes no sense at all.

 

[james blunt]

He asked for evidence. In other words, you need to prove your postulates are correct. And no, your intuition isn't proof enough.

And, of course, the facts are against you. We *know* that space is dynamically linked with matter. We *know* that it expands and can be curved. Your denials and counter-claims are irrelevant.

Scratches head ....

1) You can't create or destroy space


Anyone want to nuke some space to see if they can destroy it ?

Proof .....

 

[Polymath257]

A.B is a dot product of A + B

You are talking nonsense .


Additionally it is my equation , it is not my fault you don't know maths .

Wow. That went even worse than I thought it would..........*boggle*

 

[Kangaroo Feathers]

A.B is a dot product of A + B

You are talking nonsense .


Additionally it is my equation , it is not my fault you don't know maths .

Ah, it's everyone else's fault for not knowing your own special maths, of course.

 

[james blunt]

Algebra is a long time ago, but A.B is the same as A x B, right? So not the same as A + B where A and B aren't 1 or 0?

A = 0.5

B=0.5

A.B = 1

A binary dot product of A + B

 

[Polymath257]

Scratches head ....

1) You can't create or destroy space


Anyone want to nuke some space to see if they can destroy it ?

Proof .....

That isn't how you get space to expand or contract or curve.

 

[Kangaroo Feathers]

Scratches head ....

1) You can't create or destroy space


Anyone want to nuke some space to see if they can destroy it ?

Proof .....

Space is created all the time. That's why we observe reder red shift the further away we look.

 

[james blunt]

Ah, it's everyone else's fault for not knowing your own special maths, of course.

You didn't know any maths before somebody created the maths . duh .....

 

[james blunt]

That isn't how you get space to expand or contract or curve.

No , that is how you distort spatial fields and air etc , space is constant and unchanging