Can religion reject this science ?

[Polymath257]

If you think that , then honestly you are not as smart as I thought you might be . You have a closed mind to the obvious . My incomplete theory I posted in this thread is only one chapter long . There is loads to go that .

I not only think that, I *know* that.

There is a reason your 'theory' is uniformly rejected. And that reason isn't some vast conspiracy. it is that your 'theory' is nonsense. And anyone who knows anything about math and physics can immediately see that.

Furthermore, you seem to be impervious to actually learning anything useful in math and physics, which makes these discussions rather tiring.

 

[james blunt]

In your special maths that no one understands but you?

Some people do understand it , few and far between though . Did you know that 1 + 1 = 1 until you were taught it ?

 

[Kangaroo Feathers]

Ok, this was fun, but I'm not going to argue with tye delusional person about their delusion. If someone could msg me when the conversation gets back to evidence based rationality, please?

 

[ratiocinator]

Hello , I have some NEW maths you haven't learned yet .........

Given you're total lack of mathematical understanding, I'm sceptical. However, if it's new you'll be able to provide arguments for it based on known concepts. Just posting things that make no sense to anybody else just makes you look like you don't know anything.

Did you know that 1 + 1 = 1 until you were taught it ?

Tell me this is a joke!

 

[james blunt]

I not only think that, I *know* that.

There is a reason your 'theory' is uniformly rejected. And that reason isn't some vast conspiracy. it is that your 'theory' is nonsense. And anyone who knows anything about math and physics can immediately see that.

Furthermore, you seem to be impervious to actually learning anything useful in math and physics, which makes these discussions rather tiring.

I'll be straight with you all , you all seem to be subjected to some sort of brain block and suffering a mass delusion .
You keep trying to insist I haven't learned physics and I need to learn some physics. What you really mean is I should accept the false programming ?

 

[Polymath257]

The maths I created and I am using is my own maths , you can't tell me that my maths is wrong because you don't recognise it and have not learned it .

What you have written is nonsense. if you want to invent some new mat, you need to be *much* more detailed than writing a garbage equation.

I know. I've actually created new math. Published it and it was accepted by those who understand it.

 

[ratiocinator]

Ok, this was fun, but I'm not going to argue with tye delusional person about their delusion. If someone could msg me when the conversation gets back to evidence based rationality, please?

Don't hold your breath...

 

[james blunt]

Ok, this was fun, but I'm not going to argue with tye delusional person about their delusion. If someone could msg me when the conversation gets back to evidence based rationality, please?

7 postulates , come back when you can falsify the postulates .

 

[Polymath257]

I'll be straight with you all , you all seem to be subjected to some sort of brain block and suffering a mass delusion .
You keep trying to insist I haven't learned physics and I need to learn some physics. What you really mean is I should accept the false programming ?

No, you should realize you made a mistake and that this 'programming' isn't the falsehood you think it is.

The only 'brain block' here is on your part: you are the one insisting on nonsense and refusing to learn new stuff.

 

[james blunt]

What you have written is nonsense. if you want to invent some new mat, you need to be *much* more detailed than writing a garbage equation.

I know. I've actually created new math. Published it and it was accepted by those who understand it.

Ok , you have my attention , help me then with my math , explain what I write . start with this , give me an equation


A negative charged mono pole pops into and out of existence by dispersion through space


Please provide the maths , I use A / k or q- / k


Correct it

 

[Polymath257]

7 postulates , come back when you can falsify the postulates .

We already have. Multiple times. You ignored our comments or misunderstood them.

So, here's a question: how does one argue with someone who is delusional, thinks they know stuff nobody else does, and always spouts nonsense? Is it better to ignore them or to engage with them?

 

[Kangaroo Feathers]

What you have written is nonsense. if you want to invent some new mat, you need to be *much* more detailed than writing a garbage equation.

I know. I've actually created new math. Published it and it was accepted by those who understand it.

But did your new maths have 1 + 1 = 1? You know, like what happebs when you try to count your fingers?

 

[james blunt]

But did your new maths have 1 + 1 = 1? You know, like what happebs when you try to count your fingers?

whoops typo , suppose to have been 2 obviously .

 

[james blunt]

We already have. Multiple times. You ignored our comments or misunderstood them.

So, here's a question: how does one argue with someone who is delusional, thinks they know stuff nobody else does, and always spouts nonsense? Is it better to ignore them or to engage with them?

You have not showed falsity of the postulates !

Secondly I will ask you all the same question , how does one explain NEW to people who are like stuck records and can't think other than their own memories of programmed education ?

You are all being arrogant , obtuse and ignorant to the new .

Help with the maths please, I have asked you !

 

[Polymath257]

Ok , you have my attention , help me then with my math , explain what I write . start with this , give me an equation


A negative charged mono pole pops into and out of existence by dispersion through space

Well, we should first ask what you mean by the phrase 'dispersion of space'. And how does such allow for the creation/destruction of a monopole? Where does the magnetic field come from? What is the dynamics that allows this to happen?

Please provide the maths , I use A / k or q- / k
Correct it

Well, you failed to define what A, q, or k are. Typically, the symbol / is used for division of numbers, so what you wrote requires A, q, and k to be numbers.So it has no connection at all with what you wrote above.

Now, what you could do instead is have a probability distribution in time that describes the probability of there being a monopole at that time. But that is just some sort of function and doesn't 'explain' anything until you determine some conditions on that probability distribution.

 

[james blunt]

Ok , you have my attention , help me then with my math , explain what I write . start with this , give me an equation


A negative charged mono pole pops into and out of existence by dispersion through space


Please provide the maths , I use A / k or q- / k


Correct it

This please

 

[james blunt]

Well, we should first ask what you mean by the phrase 'dispersion of space'. And how does such allow for the creation/destruction of a monopole? Where does the magnetic field come from? What is the dynamics that allows this to happen?

OK, I'll start here and try to explain ,

Start with a singularity ZPE , zero point energy ,

Then share the energy point with infinite space i.e divide

I will name the point A and I will name the space k

I get A / k

What is wrong with that ?

 

[Kangaroo Feathers]

We already have. Multiple times. You ignored our comments or misunderstood them.

So, here's a question: how does one argue with someone who is delusional, thinks they know stuff nobody else does, and always spouts nonsense? Is it better to ignore them or to engage with them?

Without appropriate psychological or psychiatric training, and, possibly, drugs, best just to ignore. You can't talk someone out of a delusion, any more than you can talk someone out of being drunk. It's not a lack of intellect or understanding, it's a problem of brain chemistry or structure. I know it's frustrating, because it SEEMS like a real conversation with a lucid person, but in actuality, it's not.

The best description I've yet heard; imagine you woke up tomorrow and couldn't find your phone. You ask if anyone has seen it, and no one knows what you're talking about. In fact, no one has ever heard of a phone, and not only that, they can show you maths and science proving telephones are impossible, this while you have every memory and conceptual understanding of phones that you have right this second. That is how it feels when you try to explain reality to a delusional person. Best case scenario, they think you are crazy or an idiot, with progressively worse scenarios from there, none of which include convincing them they are mistaken.

 

[james blunt]

Without appropriate psychological or psychiatric training, and, pissibly, drugs, best just to ignore. You can't talk someone out of a delusion, any more than you can talk someone out of being drunk. It's not a lack of intellect or understanding, it's a problem of brain chemistry or structure. I know it's frustrating, because it SEEMS like a real conversation with a lucid person, but in actuality, it's not.

The best description I've yet heard; imagine you woke up tomorrow and couldn't find your phone. You ask if anyone has seen it, and no one knows what you're talking about. In fact, know one bas ever heard of a phone, and not only that, they can show you maths and science proving telephones are impossible, this while you have every memory and conceptual understanding of pgones that you have right this second. That is how it feels when you try to explain reality to a delusional person. Best case scenario, they think you are crazy or an idiot, with progressively worse scenarios from there, none of which include convincing them they are mistaken.

Oh i got , the cyber science cops are gang attacking me , this happens regular on science forums . Religion don't let them beat the truth . They don't wan't a miracle , they want all religion to end .

Science is embarrassed how stupid they have been ! I know this .

 

[ratiocinator]

A negative charged mono pole pops into and out of existence by dispersion through space

What's a "negative charged mono pole"? Normally a monopole would refer to a magnetic monopole, which don't exist according standard theories (there are hypotheses that would allow them but that would mean one of Maxwell's equations is wrong).

Negatively charge would imply an electric charge.

What is "dispersion through space"?

Please provide the maths , I use A / k or q- / k

This is the problem, you don't even seem to get the purpose of maths in science. What do the letters mean? "q-/ k" doesn't make sense anyway.