Can religion reject this science ?

[james blunt]

What's a "negative charged mono pole"? Normally a monopole would refer to a magnetic monopole, which don't exist according standard theories (there are hypotheses that would allow them but that would mean one of Maxwell's equations is wrong).

Negatively charge would imply an electric charge.

What is "dispersion through space"?



This is the problem, you don't even seem to get the purpose of maths in science. What do the letters mean? "q-/ k" doesn't make sense anyway.

Of course a mono pole doesn't exist because it pops into and out of existence !

But then electrons and protons . mono-poles form a binary within the N-field .

What does dispersion normally mean ?

q- is charge and k is space .

Simple rules of thermodynamics , high state energy traverses to lower state energies .

 

[james blunt]

Basic science people pfffff.....P is momentum

 

[james blunt]

If you like , you can also put the milky way in the center of the circle and you can put the ''expanding'' galaxies on the circumference line .

Energy is self inflating because the exterior is often less energy .

Apologies if I missed any replies , that was a bit hectic !

 

[james blunt]

The emission spectrum of a chemical element or chemical compound is the spectrum of frequencies of electromagnetic radiation emitted due to an atom or molecule making a transition from a high energy state to a lower energy state.

Emission spectrum - Wikipedia

see,,,,,, I know what I am talking about , if I started to go deep into the technicalities you would really get lost . I am trying to keep it simple for you all to understand .

The momentum of c is not propulsion , it is attraction , a transition from high energy state points to lower energy state points .

P(c)=<E

Additionally I have rewrote Newtons law of motion to cover all this !

An object in motion will remain in motion if the energy state ahead of the object is less than the object .

 

[ratiocinator]

Of course a mono pole doesn't exist because it pops into and out of existence !

That's self-contradictory.

But then electrons and protons . mono-poles form a binary within the N-field .

Meaningless. You still haven't defined an N-field and "form a binary" what?

What does dispersion normally mean ?

Distributing things over a wider area. What is being distributed through space that makes you magic monopoles appear?

q- is charge and k is space .

How can you represent space with just one variable? You still haven't said what A is and what the hell has charge divided by space supposed to mean?

Sorry but it's blinding obvious you haven't got the first clue about science or maths or how the two work together.

 

[james blunt]

That's self-contradictory.



Meaningless. You still haven't defined an N-field and "form a binary" what?



Distributing things over a wider area. What is being distributed through space that makes you magic monopoles appear?



How can you represent space with just one variable? You still haven't said what A is and what the hell has charge divided by space supposed to mean?

Sorry but it's blinding obvious you haven't got the first clue about science or maths or how the two work together.

You are being intentionally obtuse , I have explained things several times in 'baby' language .


A N-field occupies the interior field space of a BH . it is an electrically neutral binary field of negative energy and positive energy

-0.5+ 0.5 = 0

This binary field , you can call a Higgs, field , you can call it space-time , you can call it an ether ,you can call it an electrical universe , the theories are all about the same thing .


Or you can call it the N-field , which is the united theory of all the other theories that is accurate and completes quantum mechanics .

I represent space with one variable , respecting space as an infinite whole .

 

[ratiocinator]

A N-field occupies the interior field space of a BH . it is an electrically neutral binary field of negative energy and positive energy

-0.5+ 0.5 = 0

This binary field , you can call a Higgs, field , you can call it space-time , you can call it an ether ,you can call it an electrical universe , the theories are all about the same thing .


Or you can call it the N-field , which is united theory of all the other theories that is accurate and completes quantum mechanics .

This is meaningless word salad. You seem to be stringing science terms together randomly.

 

[james blunt]

This is meaningless word salad. You seem to be stringing science terms together randomly.

Now I know you are trolling me !

A united theory of theories to make a complete theory and you can't understand that ?

 

[james blunt]

The Universe Inside and Out !


Introduction.

The Universe inside and out is a journey of discovery that considers past science and present science . A journey of discover that will advance present science thoughts and theory , opening up a whole new era of science in regards to physics and physical process .
The Universe inside and out makes reference to Dirac , Newton , Higg's , Tesla and Einstein , concluding an united field theory namely the N-field theory , an united field theory that explains the beginning of the visual universe , unites field matter ( spatial quantum fields ) and atomic matter ( Visible objects ) into an united manifold that is independent of space.
Additionally the Universe inside and out explains the gravity mechanism , the nature of light and the nature of time .


Can people not read ?

If my theory is wrong , then so is the entire history of physics as my theory uses basic science and physical facts .

 

[james blunt]

And may I remind people of the word NEW

new
Dictionary result for new
/njuː/
adjective

1. 1.
   produced, introduced, or discovered recently or now for the first time; not existing before.

My new maths

A binary is


binary
Dictionary result for binary
/ˈbʌɪnəri/
adjective

1. 
   
   
   • 1.
     relating to, composed of, or involving two things.
   • 2.
     relating to, using, or denoting a system of numerical notation that has 2 rather than 10 as a base.

noun

1. 
   
   
   • 1.
     the binary system of notation.
     "the device is counting in binary"
   • 2.
     something having two parts.

I'm using 1.1 and 2.2

An atom is a binary particle , ok ? A spatial field is a binary field , ok ?

A + B is a binary , ok?

It's really not difficult .

''A'' cannot exist without the binary partner of ''B'' and vice versus for the reason of , there would be no bond to stop the high energy mono-poles dispersing and diminishing into lower energy state space .


Micro bang energy , the rudiment of energy that powers the universe .

A / k and B / k

At any random geometrical point of space , a mono pole electrostatic charge pops into and out of existence . The self annihilation of the virtual particle being attributed to the lower energy state surrounding space and the fact of the transition of high energy state to lower energy state geometrical points . A mono-pole has no bond to stop it from dispersing into space , there is no strong nuclear force to hold it together as a binary that is isotropic stretched but not dispersed .

P.s The micro bangs are isotropic , I don't have a 3d program to use to make the video 3d .

 

[ratiocinator]

A united theory of theories to make a complete theory and you can't understand that ?

The problem is that, because you've never bothered to actually understand a theory in science, you have no clue what is entailed in producing one.

You say there is an N-field but you don't know how to even define a field. A field is something that extends over some region of space and has a value at every point in that region. The value might just be a number (scalar) or it could be a vector or a higher rank tensor.

To define the field, you need to say what produces it and how to calculate its value at any point in space in some defined configuration of whatever produces it. So you need to show how to find a formula that involves position (x,y,z) and time t and produces a value (scalar, vector).

Wittering on about "electrically neutral binary field of negative energy and positive energy" is pointless nonsense.

Also you said; "This binary field , you can call a Higgs, field , you can call it space-time , you can call it an ether ,you can call it an electrical universe , the theories are all about the same thing ." That is simply untrue, they are not the same things at all.

 

[Kangaroo Feathers]

whoops typo , suppose to have been 2 obviously .

Hey, may as well keep it in, 1 + 1 =1 is no more nonsensical than the rest of your claims, in for a penny, in for a pound!

 

[Polymath257]

Basic science people pfffff.....P is momentum

View attachment 26814

And here is one of the meaningless pictures. Do you realize that momentum and energy aren't even the same sort of thing, so that P=<E makes no sense at all?

If you like , you can also put the milky way in the center of the circle and you can put the ''expanding'' galaxies on the circumference line .

Energy is self inflating because the exterior is often less energy .

Apologies if I missed any replies , that was a bit hectic !

More meaningless word salad. The actual galaxies aren't at the same distance from the Milky Way (so being on a circumference is impossible). You are making a claim that energy naturally flows from regions of higher energy density to regions of lower energy density. This is false from thermodynamics (temperature is the relevant variable, not energy).

You make no connection between 'expanding energy' and monopoles, whether 'posi

You are being intentionally obtuse , I have explained things several times in 'baby' language .


A N-field occupies the interior field space of a BH . it is an electrically neutral binary field of negative energy and positive energy

-0.5+ 0.5 = 0

What is 'field space'? as opposed to a 'binary field'? What are they fields *of*?

An equation that has no connection to the word salad before it.

This binary field , you can call a Higgs, field , you can call it space-time , you can call it an ether ,you can call it an electrical universe , the theories are all about the same thing .

This only shows you have no idea what a Higg's field actually is, let alone enough math to grasp the concepts involved. No, the Higg's field is NOT the same as spacetime. No, it is not the same as an ether. No, it is not the same as an electrical universe. In fact, all of those concepts are unrelated to the others.

Or you can call it the N-field , which is the united theory of all the other theories that is accurate and completes quantum mechanics .

Well, you make that claim. But other than claiming the N-field has those properties, you haven't given any details about it, its dynamics, or how it relates to anything else. In other words, you make a claim but provide no reason to accept that claim.

I represent space with one variable , respecting space as an infinite whole .

Which explains nothing.

 

[james blunt]

Hey, may as well keep it in, 1 + 1 =1 is no more nonsensical than the rest of your claims, in for a penny, in for a pound!

Well, ok if you insist , I will demonstrate 1+1=1

I have a cup and I am going to collect raindrops ,

1+1 raindrops enter my cup

I look in the cup to only see one raindrop .

1+1=1

Because mass + mass = mass

Just like

N + N = N

N * N³ = N

 

[Polymath257]

The Universe Inside and Out !


Introduction.

The Universe inside and out is a journey of discovery that considers past science and present science . A journey of discover that will advance present science thoughts and theory , opening up a whole new era of science in regards to physics and physical process .
The Universe inside and out makes reference to Dirac , Newton , Higg's , Tesla and Einstein , concluding an united field theory namely the N-field theory , an united field theory that explains the beginning of the visual universe , unites field matter ( spatial quantum fields ) and atomic matter ( Visible objects ) into an united manifold that is independent of space.
Additionally the Universe inside and out explains the gravity mechanism , the nature of light and the nature of time .


Can people not read ?

If my theory is wrong , then so is the entire history of physics as my theory uses basic science and physical facts .

No, your theory is wrong and you simply don't understand what these other people said.

We can read and understand you don't grasp even basic concepts. And we can then reject your nonsense for what it is.

 

[Polymath257]

Well, ok if you insist , I will demonstrate 1+1=1

I have a cup and I am going to collect raindrops ,

1+1 raindrops enter my cup

I look in the cup to only see one raindrop .

1+1=1

Because mass + mass = mass

Just like

N + N = N

N * N³ = N

 

[exchemist]

Wow. That went even worse than I thought it would..........*boggle*

I'm sorry, this is partly my fault, for giving Theorist a chance to introduce his joke algebra again - almost impossible to believe it can be that bad by accident. But, as before, I have roared with laughter reading this nonsensical thread, so perhaps not an entire waste of time.

Perhaps he is really a modern day Lewis Carroll and knows exactly what he is doing........

 

[james blunt]

And here is one of the meaningless pictures. Do you realize that momentum and energy aren't even the same sort of thing, so that P=<E makes no sense at all?

Do you realise I discovered that light does not have its own speed ?

I understood force and propulsion and momentum , what you don't seem to understand is new advanced thoughts on the subjects .

Energy travels at a speed from one object to another , the reason for this is that the high state energy always is attracted to the lower state energy . The action can be described P=<E , which states the momentum is equal/caused by the lesser energy state . Energy slows down if the medium is denser as you know , we can describe that as P=>E .

I will answer your other questions in a bit , I need rest my brain before it explodes

 

[james blunt]

You just don't see the same semantics as I . People view things differently . The two raindrops obviously converge in my cup to give 1 mass .
You have to think deep to see truths .

1 mass + 1 mass = 1 mass

see?

 

[Polymath257]

I'm sorry, this is partly my fault, for giving Theorist a chance to introduce his joke algebra again - almost impossible to believe it can be that bad by accident. But, as before, I have roared with laughter reading this thread, so perhaps not an entire waste of time.

I'm almost to the point of agreeing, here. He may just be a very, very good Poe.