Can religion reject this science ?

[james blunt]

As I said, ill-informed waffle on a forum is not a demonstration - the actual experiments are demonstrations. If you can't see why words on a forum don't stand up against real experiments, you're totally beyond hope as far as science goes.

Lets address this and put it simply for our friend here who does not understand things can be at error .


The semantics and notions of the actual experiments are interpreted incorrectly .

 

[Prestor John]

So what? That does not mean that he cannot follow the scientific method. That is almost as bad as claiming that one has to be an ordained priest to be a Christian.I

He has helped educate and inspire thousands upon thousands young scientists that have contributed research to the scientific community. You sound jealous.

In recent years he has been trying to "throw his weight" by claiming that he is some sort of representative of the scientific community, when he isn't.

I'm not going to put any more effort into responding to you. You're not worth it.

 

[Subduction Zone]

In recent years he has been trying to "throw his weight" by claiming that he is some sort of representative of the scientific community, when he isn't.

I'm not going to put any more effort into responding to you. You're not worth it.

What makes you think that he cannot represent the scientific community? Are you made at him because he kicked Ken Ham's donkey in debate?

And the reason that you won't respond to me is because you know that in this matter you cannot win. You are clearly wrong.

 

[james blunt]

What makes you think that he cannot represent the scientific community? Are you made at him because he kicked Ken Ham's donkey in debate?

And the reason that you won't respond to me is because you know that in this matter you cannot win. You are clearly wrong.

I kick all your beeps but I can't even get a job working from home as a project advisor !

 

[Prestor John]

What makes you think that he cannot represent the scientific community? Are you made at him because he kicked Ken Ham's donkey in debate?

And the reason that you won't respond to me is because you know that in this matter you cannot win. You are clearly wrong.

I won't respond to you because you are you.

Bill Nye is as much a representative of the scientific community as you are worthwhile to talk to.

Which is not at all.

 

[Subduction Zone]

I kick all your beeps but I can't even get a job working from home as a project advisor !

That is the funniest thing that I have read in a long time. People have tried to help you to learn and you prefer delusion.

The reason that you can't get a project is that people that understand the sciences can clearly see that you have no knowledge at all. It is never too late. You can always try to learn.

 

[Subduction Zone]

I won't respond to you because you are you.

Bill Nye is as much a representative of the scientific community as you are worthwhile to talk to.

Which is not at all.

No, you won't respond to me because I constantly show that you are wrong. You are wrong about Bill Nye. But thanks for the compliment.

 

[Prestor John]

No, you won't respond to me because I constantly show that you are wrong. You are wrong about Bill Nye. But thanks for the compliment.

I'd rather you believe all this then have to deal with you at all.

It will be impossible for you to call that a win.

 

[james blunt]

That is the funniest thing that I have read in a long time. People have tried to help you to learn and you prefer delusion.

The reason that you can't get a project is that people that understand the sciences can clearly see that you have no knowledge at all. It is never too late. You can always try to learn.

That is funny , not a single one of you science types have been able to demonstrate me incorrect in a very long time . You all avoid discussion and direct questions , I've challenged you all so many times and you always lose .

I showed the speed of time is constant earlier , demonstrated science errors !

Science just keeps brushing these errors under the carpet as if they don't matter . They are wrong , I have demonstrated they are wrong ..

It's a sort of racism against me because I have no formal qualifications ...

 

[Subduction Zone]

I'd rather you believe all this then have to deal with you at all.

It will be impossible for you to call that a win.

Your inability to support your inaccurate claims alone makes it a win.

By the way, do you know when Ken Ham clearly lost the debate to Nye? There was one very clear moment in the debate when Nye clearly won the day.

 

[Subduction Zone]

That is funny , not a single one of you science types have been able to demonstrate me incorrect in a very long time . You all avoid discussion and direct questions , I've challenged you all so many times and you always lose .

I showed the speed of time is constant earlier , demonstrated science errors !

Science just keeps brushing these errors under the carpet as if they don't matter . They are wrong , I have demonstrated they are wrong ..

It's a sort of racism against me because I have no formal qualifications ...

That is incorrect. You have not be able to understand the corrections. That does not mean that you were not refuted.

All the rest is delusion on your part.

 

[Workman]

Hello friends! Why all the fuss! Let’s answer some questions: what’s the most valuable number?

 

[james blunt]

That is incorrect. You have not be able to understand the corrections. That does not mean that you were not refuted.

All the rest is delusion on your part.

You've not provided corrections , you have just made that up ! The only thing people have done is post some theories as if in some way they are evidence and falsify my 7 postulates . You or anyone else as demonstrated ''Jack'' , proven no falsity in my postulates .

I will prove it now to the readers , I ask you again ( sick of asking )

1) Space cannot be created or destroyed

Please provide evidence to the contrary !

This does not mean post an irrelevant theory .

Note to the readers : Observe how he can't provide evidence to the contrary .

 

[james blunt]

Hello friends! Why all the fuss! Let’s answer some questions: what’s the most valuable number?

Numbers have no value !

 

[Prestor John]

You've not provided corrections , you have just made that up ! The only thing people have done is post some theories as if in some way they are evidence and falsify my 7 postulates . You or anyone else as demonstrated ''Jack'' , proven no falsity in my postulates .

I will prove it now to the readers , I ask you again ( sick of asking )

1) Space cannot be created or destroyed

Please provide evidence to the contrary !

This does not mean post an irrelevant theory .

Note to the readers : Observe how he can't provide evidence to the contrary .

Subduction Zone will never admit when he is wrong. He will ignore heis obvious losses.

He honestly isn't worth the time and effort.

 

[james blunt]

Subduction Zone will never admit when he is wrong. He will ignore he obvious losses.

He honestly isn't worth the time and effort.

There is quite a few like Subduction on science forums , they often gang together to get people banned who won't agree with false theory etc .
It's a shame too , I have seen some really good theories out there by the average Joe but they are often mocked and ignored .

 

[Subduction Zone]

Subduction Zone will never admit when he is wrong. He will ignore he obvious losses.

He honestly isn't worth the time and effort.

That is clearly not true. I have admitted to being wrong countless times. You have not been able to show that I am wrong. I challenge you to find one "obvious loss".

By the way, let's avoid the personal attacks. I have merely shown that your ideas are wrong when it comes to the sciences. And quite often sexuality. Though that is not my main battle here. You almost certainly understand some aspects of life better than I do. I tend to avoid debating in areas where I clearly lack knowledge. I will not debate on what is the best way to tune a V-8 engine. How to plumb a house properly, I am sure the list is endless. I will debate in areas where I do have knowledge.

 

[Workman]

Numbers have no value !

Are you sure? I would think that the number zero(0) have most valuable.
It allows, and disa-allows
It gives in more but it cannot take away, actually you cannot destroy it, nearly as similar to space

 

[Subduction Zone]

There is quite a few like Subduction on science forums , they often gang together to get people banned who won't agree with false theory etc .
It's a shame too , I have seen some really good theories out there by the average Joe but they are often mocked and ignored .

But as I have shown by a very simple question, you do not have any theories. You do not even seem to understand the term.

 

[james blunt]

Are you sure? I would think that the number zero(0) have most valuable.
It allows, and disa-allows
It gives in more but it cannot take away, actually you cannot destroy it, nearly as similar to space

To me , 0 is not a number it is the representation of absolute and everything is relative to the absolute . Numbers greater than 0 are arbitrary but relative , they represent quantity etc which we would struggle without . I suppose all numbers above 0 have the same value in the sense of relative measurement .