• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Can religion reject this science ?

Polymath257

Think & Care
Staff member
Premium Member
Yes you got it , Q- / k = 0

OK, so zero charge density.

Popped into and out of existence is the so what , the rudiment of energy before the big bang . Space-time trying to begin ....ok you must have it now ?

Whao there! You just leaped from zero charge density to popping in and out of existence. What is the connection there? Then, the phrase 'the rudiment of energy before the big bang' has no context and is meaningless in this sentence. Space-time 'trying to begin' again has no connection to anything you have said previously.
 

james blunt

Well-Known Member
Yes, you divided a charge by an infinite volume and got a zero charge density. So?

I've to pop put for a while , I feel you are very close to understanding me .

Q- / k = 0 and Q+ / k = 0

When Q- and Q+ combine to become a singularity , Q- / k and Q+/ k pop back into existence to expand (Q-) + (Q+) / t

Space-time begins ! The first gravitational mass is formed and Q- and Q+ is attracted to (Q-) + (Q+) / t .

I'll be back soon , think about the process I've just explained .
 

Polymath257

Think & Care
Staff member
Premium Member
I've to pop put for a while , I feel you are very close to understanding me .

Q- / k = 0 and Q+ / k = 0

When Q- and Q+ combine to become a singularity ,
Whoops! Why would they combine to make a singularity?

Q- / k and Q+/ k pop back into existence to expand (Q-) + (Q+) / t

What you wrote makes no sense.

Space-time begins !
You've made no connection to time at all up to this point.

The first gravitational mass is formed and Q- and Q+ is attracted to (Q-) + (Q+) / t .

You have made no connection to mass up to this point.

I'll be back soon , think about the process I've just explained .

I've seen no explanation. I've seen a few vague claims without context.
 

james blunt

Well-Known Member
Whoops! Why would they combine to make a singularity?



What you wrote makes no sense.


You've made no connection to time at all up to this point.



You have made no connection to mass up to this point.



I've seen no explanation. I've seen a few vague claims without context.
I've not wrote 3 and 4 yet ,

Contents:

1. Absolute Newtonian space
2. Micro bang theory ( Virtual particles popping into and out of existence ).
3. Binary energy particle ( A quantum singularity )
4. Binary energy particle expansion ( Singularity expansion)

5. The n-field theory (The interior field matter of a binary expansion)
6. The N-field theory (Atomic matter)
7. The gravity mechanism
8. The nature of light
9. The meaning of time

We've jumped ahead slightly !

Do you agree that Q- / k = 0 and Q+ / k = 0 represents content 2 ?

I'm basically having it peered as I write it .

Do you think I need to add anything to content 2?

2. Micro bang theory ( Virtual particles popping into and out of existence ).

We've already discussed the absolute of space and in a sense , space is an infinite volume of nothingness that has always existed and will always exist . It would seem quite impossible that a fundamental energy that powered the Universe could manifest itself from nothingness . Any given point of space would have no force or pressure acting on it , it would seem a miracle would be required for zero point energy (ZPE) , to be created at any given point of space . The notion of how energy first manifested if imperceivable , we can only make our best guess's , using our knowledge , logic and intuition of how this manifestation event could of possibly happened .
The present model , The Big Bang Theory , suggests the universe expanded from a very high-density and high-temperature state but gives no origin reason(s) of how this high-density , high -temperature state manifested . Micro bang theory is my proposal and best guess of how this high-density , high -temperature state manifested, explaining opposite polarity electrostatic point charges (mono-poles) , popping into and out of existence .
The Micro bang theory considers the aspects of a very high-density and high-temperature state , recognising and proposing , that for any form of energy to exist or any event to take place , that energy or event would with a certainty need a pre-existing space to exist in or occur in , thus concluding pre-existing absolute space as explained prior . In consideration of ZPE , the micro bang theory considers the physics involved and what would happen to a manifested mono-pole point charge that manifested at any given point of space.
It would be seemingly apparent that surrounding spatial points of the ZPE point would be a lesser state energy than the higher state energy point . In consideration of thermal dynamics and spectral emissions , the high energy state points energy , traverses to lower energy state points . To assume that a manifested mono-pole point charge simply self annihilates by dispersing into space , by the self drive mechanism of high energy transition to lower energy state points , would seem a ''true'' assumption based on existing facts of thermal dynamics and spectral emissions .
The Micro bang theory proposes that from the instant of manifestation of the mono-pole electrostatic point charge , it is instantly attracted to all the surrounding lesser energy space in an isotropic manner . Thus causing self annihilation of the mono-pole electrostatic point charge . Additionally , the Micro Bang theory proposes that because the manifested charge is instantly in a state of self annihilation , the density is instantly weakened beyond the magnitude needed to create an electrostatic strong force , to create a binary existence with an opposite pole electrostatic charge . There can be no doubt , that a mono-poles individualism has no binary bond to retain form without an opposite charged mono-pole , thus explaining the self annihilation of the manifesting energy , namely Micro bangs , the rudiment of energy that powers the Universe !

It's difficult to express the Micro bang process mathematically in terms of units and values , the infinity of space having no representation in terms of dimensions or values , XYZt and entropy being irrelevant . To gain mutual understanding the Micro bang theory requests that you'll preliminary accept the value k to represent infinite absolute space . Additionally the Micro bang theory requests the preliminary acceptance of Q- to represent a negative charged mono-pole (traditionally an electron charge) and Q+ to represent a positive charged mono-pole (traditionally a Proton charge).

In preliminary acceptance of these values , the Micro bang theory expresses :

1) Q- / <E (k) = 0 to express a negative charged mono-pole divided by the lesser energy state of absolute space , annihilated out of negligible existence

2) Q+ / <E (k) = 0 to express a positive charged mono-pole divided by lesser energy state of absolute space , annihilated out of negligible existence
 

Polymath257

Think & Care
Staff member
Premium Member
I've not wrote 3 and 4 yet ,

Contents:

1. Absolute Newtonian space
2. Micro bang theory ( Virtual particles popping into and out of existence ).
3. Binary energy particle ( A quantum singularity )
4. Binary energy particle expansion ( Singularity expansion)

5. The n-field theory (The interior field matter of a binary expansion)
6. The N-field theory (Atomic matter)
7. The gravity mechanism
8. The nature of light
9. The meaning of time

We've jumped ahead slightly !

Do you agree that Q- / k = 0 and Q+ / k = 0 represents content 2 ?

No.

I'm basically having it peered as I write it .

Do you think I need to add anything to content 2?

2. Micro bang theory ( Virtual particles popping into and out of existence ).

We've already discussed the absolute of space and in a sense , space is an infinite volume of nothingness that has always existed and will always exist . It would seem quite impossible that a fundamental energy that powered the Universe could manifest itself from nothingness . Any given point of space would have no force or pressure acting on it , it would seem a miracle would be required for zero point energy (ZPE) , to be created at any given point of space . The notion of how energy first manifested if imperceivable , we can only make our best guess's , using our knowledge , logic and intuition of how this manifestation event could of possibly happened .
The present model , The Big Bang Theory , suggests the universe expanded from a very high-density and high-temperature state but gives no origin reason(s) of how this high-density , high -temperature state manifested . Micro bang theory is my proposal and best guess of how this high-density , high -temperature state manifested, explaining opposite polarity electrostatic point charges (mono-poles) , popping into and out of existence .
The Micro bang theory considers the aspects of a very high-density and high-temperature state , recognising and proposing , that for any form of energy to exist or any event to take place , that energy or event would with a certainty need a pre-existing space to exist in or occur in , thus concluding pre-existing absolute space as explained prior . In consideration of ZPE , the micro bang theory considers the physics involved and what would happen to a manifested mono-pole point charge that manifested at any given point of space.
It would be seemingly apparent that surrounding spatial points of the ZPE point would be a lesser state energy than the higher state energy point . In consideration of thermal dynamics and spectral emissions , the high energy state points energy , traverses to lower energy state points . To assume that a manifested mono-pole point charge simply self annihilates by dispersing into space , by the self drive mechanism of high energy transition to lower energy state points , would seem a ''true'' assumption based on existing facts of thermal dynamics and spectral emissions .
The Micro bang theory proposes that from the instant of manifestation of the mono-pole electrostatic point charge , it is instantly attracted to all the surrounding lesser energy space in an isotropic manner . Thus causing self annihilation of the mono-pole electrostatic point charge . Additionally , the Micro Bang theory proposes that because the manifested charge is instantly in a state of self annihilation , the density is instantly weakened beyond the magnitude needed to create an electrostatic strong force , to create a binary existence with an opposite pole electrostatic charge . There can be no doubt , that a mono-poles individualism has no binary bond to retain form without an opposite charged mono-pole , thus explaining the self annihilation of the manifesting energy , namely Micro bangs , the rudiment of energy that powers the Universe !

It's difficult to express the Micro bang process mathematically in terms of units and values , the infinity of space having no representation in terms of dimensions or values , XYZt and entropy being irrelevant . To gain mutual understanding the Micro bang theory requests that you'll preliminary accept the value k to represent infinite absolute space . Additionally the Micro bang theory requests the preliminary acceptance of Q- to represent a negative charged mono-pole (traditionally an electron charge) and Q+ to represent a positive charged mono-pole (traditionally a Proton charge).

In preliminary acceptance of these values , the Micro bang theory expresses :

1) Q- / <E (k) = 0 to express a negative charged mono-pole divided by the lesser energy state of absolute space , annihilated out of negligible existence

2) Q+ / <E (k) = 0 to express a positive charged mono-pole divided by lesser energy state of absolute space , annihilated out of negligible existence


OK, so no actual substance, just a few vague words about what might have been the case? No evidence that it was, indeed, the case? And no actual math to explain anything about it?

To me it sounds like a poorly written proposal. No real substance and little reason to think the plan will actually lead to anything. Certainly, there is no real 'theory' there. You would need a LOT more detail to get to anything even approaching a theory.
 

james blunt

Well-Known Member
OK, so no actual substance, just a few vague words about what might have been the case? No evidence that it was, indeed, the case? And no actual math to explain anything about it?

To me it sounds like a poorly written proposal. No real substance and little reason to think the plan will actually lead to anything. Certainly, there is no real 'theory' there. You would need a LOT more detail to get to anything even approaching a theory.

Ok , I appreciate your opinion . You say there is no actual math, yet you said earlier you use Q for charge .

You then understood Q- / k = 0 but you now say there is no actual maths ?


If you understood it the math must be valid ?
 

james blunt

Well-Known Member
Yes, you divided a charge by an infinite volume and got a zero charge density. So?

I re-quote the above from you ! Can I use that line in my theory ?

1) Q- / k = 0 to express a negative charged mono-pole divided by the lesser energy state of absolute space , annihilated out of negligible existence

2) Q+ / k = 0 to express a positive charged mono-pole divided by lesser energy state of absolute space , annihilated out of negligible existence

Essentially dividing a mono-pole point charge by an infinite volume to measure zero charge density !

You've explained my math back to me so therefore it must work ?

Additionally spectral emissions are evidence to my theory .

The emission spectrum of a chemical element or chemical compound is the spectrum of frequencies of electromagnetic radiation emitted due to an atom or molecule making a transition from a high energy state to a lower energy state.

Emission spectrum - Wikipedia


In physics, the second law of thermodynamics says that heat flows naturally from an object at a higher temperature to an object at a lower temperature, and heat doesn't flow in the opposite direction of its own accord.

Basic stuff I know and supporting evidence to my micro bang theory .
 
Last edited:

Polymath257

Think & Care
Staff member
Premium Member
Ok , I appreciate your opinion . You say there is no actual math, yet you said earlier you use Q for charge .

You then understood Q- / k = 0 but you now say there is no actual maths ?

Nothing relevant to anything like what you have been discussing. The only relevance of that equation is saying that the charge density is zero, which is absolutely trivial. There is NOTHING about time, or popping into or out of existence, or anything else you have been talking about.

If you understood it the math must be valid ?

It is passable as a calculation of a charge density.
 

Polymath257

Think & Care
Staff member
Premium Member
I re-quote the above from you ! Can I use that line in my theory ?

1) Q- / k = 0 to express a negative charged mono-pole divided by the lesser energy state of absolute space , annihilated out of negligible existence

2) Q+ / k = 0 to express a positive charged mono-pole divided by lesser energy state of absolute space , annihilated out of negligible existence

No, neither of these equations has anything to say about monopoles, per se. They simply are calculations (trivial ones) of charge densities.

Essentially dividing a mono-pole point charge by an infinite volume to measure zero charge density !

You've explained my math back to me so therefore it must work ?

As a calculation of charge density in this one situation, sure.

Additionally spectral emissions are evidence to my theory .

The emission spectrum of a chemical element or chemical compound is the spectrum of frequencies of electromagnetic radiation emitted due to an atom or molecule making a transition from a high energy state to a lower energy state.

Emission spectrum - Wikipedia


In physics, the second law of thermodynamics says that heat flows naturally from an object at a higher temperature to an object at a lower temperature, and heat doesn't flow in the opposite direction of its own accord.

Basic stuff I know and supporting evidence to my micro bang theory .
Um....there is no connection between the Q/k=0 stuff and any of this. You need to be a LOT more clear about that connection to go anywhere.
 

ratiocinator

Lightly seared on the reality grill.
1) Q- / k = 0 to express a negative charged mono-pole divided by the lesser energy state of absolute space , annihilated out of negligible existence

2) Q+ / k = 0 to express a positive charged mono-pole divided by lesser energy state of absolute space , annihilated out of negligible existence

Essentially dividing a mono-pole point charge by an infinite volume to measure zero charge density !

You've explained my math back to me so therefore it must work ?

Look, either Q+ / k = 0 is an eccentric and rather pointless way of saying a charge divided by infinite volume gives zero charge density (which is not new, original, or in the least bit interesting) or not.

If it is saying that a charge divided by infinite volume gives zero charge density, it has nothing to do with annihilation, energy states, or negligible existence (whatever that is supposed to be).

Additionally spectral emissions are evidence to my theory .

You haven't presented a theory - you don't even seem to understand what a theory is.
 

james blunt

Well-Known Member
It is passable as a calculation of a charge density.

That's exactly what it suppose to mean so thank you for accepting my ''pass'' math .

Q- / k = 0 is popping into and out of existence . Time does not begin until section 3 of my theory .

Let me explain in brief , section 3 , at any random point of k , Q- and Q+ manifested simultaneously at the same point .

Because they are opposite poles , they are attracted to each other and have electrostatic strong force bonds .

(Q-) + (Q+) / t = 1

Now time has begun , there is something to age .

3. Binary energy particle ( A quantum singularity )

t is actually k though but it is harder to understand that way .
 
Last edited:

james blunt

Well-Known Member
Look, either Q+ / k = 0 is an eccentric and rather pointless way of saying a charge divided by infinite volume gives zero charge density (which is not new, original, or in the least bit interesting) or not.

If it is saying that a charge divided by infinite volume gives zero charge density, it has nothing to do with annihilation, energy states, or negligible existence (whatever that is supposed to be).



You haven't presented a theory - you don't even seem to understand what a theory is.
We'll see , Polymath is getting to grips with it , it is advanced , harder than relativity to understand .
 

james blunt

Well-Known Member
4. Binary energy particle expansion ( Singularity expansion)

4 in brief , all the pre-existing micro bang energy is attracted centripetally and isotropically to 3. Binary energy particle ( A quantum singularity ) causing it to expand .


5. The n-field theory (The interior field matter of a binary expansion)

The expansion 4, creates the first spatial field interior , the field is electrically neutral , namely a n-field .
Higgs called it a higgs field , Einstein space-time ,

6. The N-field theory (Atomic matter)

Denser N-field particles manifest within the n-field , the n-field ''encloses'' them . They can't expand like the n-field first does .
 
Last edited:

Polymath257

Think & Care
Staff member
Premium Member
That's exactly what it suppose to mean so thank you for accepting my ''pass'' math .

For computing the charge density, yes. A bit eccentric, like was said, but passable.

Q- / k = 0 is popping into and out of existence . Time does not begin until section 3 of my theory .

Nope. The math says nothing at all about 'popping into and out of existence'.

Let me explain in brief , section 3 , at any random point of k , Q- and Q+ manifested simultaneously at the same point .

Because they are opposite poles , they are attracted to each other and have electrostatic strong force bonds .

(Q-) + (Q+) / t = 1

Um, no. Being attracted and having strong bonds is NOT the same as addition, nor does it say the sum is 1.

Now time has begun , there is something to age .

Does not follow from previous statements.

3. Binary energy particle ( A quantum singularity )

t is actually k though but it is harder to understand that way .

Gobbledigook.
 

Polymath257

Think & Care
Staff member
Premium Member
We'll see , Polymath is getting to grips with it , it is advanced , harder than relativity to understand .

How does the old line go? Your ideas are both true and new. But those that are true are not new and those that are new are not true.
 

Polymath257

Think & Care
Staff member
Premium Member
4. Binary energy particle expansion ( Singularity expansion)

4 in brief , all the pre-existing micro bang energy is attracted centripetally and isotropically to 3. Binary energy particle ( A quantum singularity ) causing it to expand .


5. The n-field theory (The interior field matter of a binary expansion)

The expansion 4, creates the first spatial field interior , the field is electrically neutral , namely a n-field .
Higgs called it a higgs field , Einstein space-time ,

6. The N-field theory (Atomic matter)

Denser N-field particles manifest within the n-field , the n-field ''encloses'' them . They can't expand like the n-field first does .

back to a mish-mash of nonsense, I see.
 

james blunt

Well-Known Member
Um, no. Being attracted and having strong bonds is NOT the same as addition, nor does it say the sum is 1.

.

Yes it does , an electron and a proton add up to 1 atom.

1E³ then is an expansion of 1 . Don't forget in the laws of charge , a neg or pos charge is attracted to neutral charge .

(Q-) + (Q+) = Neutral charge (N) also
 
Last edited:

james blunt

Well-Known Member
It's not difficult to understand ...1E³

which is (Q-) + (Q+) / t * (Q- / k) / t + *(Q+ / k) / t= >4/3 pi r ³ / t




nnnnn.jpg

Consider , everything you observe is in the interior of an expanding atom , micro atoms exist within the interior of the expanding atom .
 
Last edited:
Top