No, it isn't. Demonstrate to me how you know God exists and know God-101 stuff.
I just explained that in the previous post.
Wrong. According to Bahai God wants us to know him and be closer to him.
My point stands. God does not need your belief. God has no needs. Humans are the ones who have needs.
“Consider the mercy of God and His gifts. He enjoineth upon you that which shall profit you, though He Himself can well dispense with all creatures.” Gleanings, p. 140
“The one true God, exalted be His glory, hath wished nothing for Himself. The allegiance of mankind profiteth Him not, neither doth its perversity harm Him. The Bird of the Realm of Utterance voiceth continually this call: “All things have I willed for thee, and thee, too, for thine own sake.” Gleanings, p. 260
The only reason God wants us to know Him and get closer to Him is for our own benefit. If we cut ourselves of from God, God's love cannot reach us.
5: O SON OF BEING! Love Me, that I may love thee. If thou lovest Me not, My love can in no wise reach thee. Know this, O servant.
The Hidden Words of Bahá’u’lláh, p. 4
Not for me. It took a while, but you and other atheists helped me realize that I never cared about evidence because I never needed it, so thanks.
That does not mean there is no evidence, that only means I do not need it in order to know that the Baha'i Faith is a true religion. Everything follows from that.
a person who is claiming revelations but is not actually having revelations will never be able to provide evidence.
A person who is claiming revelations who is actually having revelations will never be able to provide evidence.
Try to think about why it is impossible to provide evidence of a revelation from God.
Funny how just one post ago you claimed it cannot be known what God would do. And now, you know!
Some things can be known and some things cannot be known. Some things can be known based upon the attributes of God coupled with logical reasoning.
The reason I keep posting is because you make so many fallacious posts it's too easy.
Yet you cannot point out one fallacy and say how it was committed.
Ah, now we are back to you CANNOT make God do what you want. You CAN if it's something you don't agree with, like appear as human, have teeth, demonstrate evidence.
Nobody can
make an All-Powerful God do what they want, for obvious logical reasons.
You forgot to even think about the fact that if a God were real, and he actually wanted to talk to someone on behalf of a religion, he would provide good evidence.
There is no reason to 'assume' that God would provide good evidence. That is the fallacy of jumping to conclusions.
There is every reason not to assume that God would provide good evidence since God wants to be believed on Faith.
Hebrews 11:6 And without faith it is impossible to please God, because anyone who approaches Him must believe that He exists and that He rewards those who earnestly seek Him.
Believing in God requires faith since no man has ever seen God. Then we go looking for the evidence. God will reward those who earnestly seek Him.
And, in most religions, people agree with this as God always shows up, does magic, fights monsters, raises many from the dead, repels evil beings who posess people and animals, gives people new shiny spirit bodies after death, sends angels to talk to people, floods the world, kicks down entire mountains, destroys armies. So when people write religious text, they always have God provide evidence. Because people know otherwise, it's likely a man attempting to fool everyone.
That was not God providing evidence since God did not write those texts. It was humans who were trying to convince people that God exists.
You are justifying and making excuses. You want people to believe the evidence is such because God wants that. But again, you have no evidence of that, just claims by a man.
If God exists, what we see is what we get and it is what God wants us to have. We cannot get anything from God other than what God wants to give us. That means we are not going to get any evidence other than what God provides. That is not claims of a man, it is what I have deduced based upon my own logical reasoning.