Nicely expressed and I agree vis-à-vis the original poster. You have been most helpful too him and I see completely where you are coming from. Sorry for writing a length post on the topic, it was just the point about "superior" that I wanted to clarify :yes: Otherwise I agree with you, and appreciate the guidance you have given to the OP.
Thank you kindly. This is nice to hear as I get more negative than positive feedback on RF.
Well let me put my hard-hat back on as I just saw myself vilified again on another thread. (those Dawkins-types are not fans)
Cheers to the UK