• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Can we quantify or measure an idea in science?

paarsurrey

Veteran Member
I think one among many other things which science cannot quantify or measure is the ideas that come to our mind.

Your idea on this please
 

Quintessence

Consults with Trees
Staff member
Premium Member
You can attempt to quantify just about anything. The problem is whether or not the method of quantification is accurately and precisely capturing what you think it is. Certain things defy simple categorization, and these, yes, science has a great deal of trouble dealing with. Where it does, it typically falls under soft science rather than hard science.
 

Alex_G

Enlightner of the Senses
I think one among many other things which science cannot quantify or measure is the ideas that come to our mind.

Your idea on this please


Well when quantifying the first thing you need are units. Quantification is often of something quite specific, and in deciding upon units, you will also decide on what it is exactly your measuring. Broad terms/subjects aren’t easily quantified because applying narrow specifics to a broad and loose subject in an attempt to explain yields little of value. If i asked you to quantify the Sun, i could mean light intensity, size, and distance etc.
'Ideas' is quite a broad term, and many aspects that constitute it are probably quantifiable, but having one unit that’s meant to represent all facets of the subject of ideas is like 'quantifying the sun' somewhat.

I would say though, if our unit is merit, then one can rate or measure ideas against a scale of proof, evidence, practical application, and so on, which we kind of do already. The question of how well does the idea hold as a stepping stone in the intellectual progression of mankind.
 

McBell

Unbound
I think one among many other things which science cannot quantify or measure is the ideas that come to our mind.

Your idea on this please
Are you asking for an idea that science cannot quantify or measure?
if so God comes to mind...

Are you asking for an idea that science can quantify or measure?
If so, we can start with cars, planes, submarines, SCUBA gear, phones, tvs, radio, plastic, etc.


I suspect that you have not presented the idea you wish to explore very clearly.
 

Octavia156

OTO/EGC
I believe the answer is NO.
All you can measure are the effects of an Idea.

There are many immeasurable things that cleary exist but cannot be quantified.
This is why Science will always have 1 eye closed, and will never be able to offer an Ultimate Answer to existance.
 

paarsurrey

Veteran Member
Are you asking for an idea that science cannot quantify or measure?
if so God comes to mind...

Are you asking for an idea that science can quantify or measure?
If so, we can start with cars, planes, submarines, SCUBA gear, phones, tvs, radio, plastic, etc.


I suspect that you have not presented the idea you wish to explore very clearly.

I don't think car is an idea;yes, it is a product made on an idea.
My question is about absolute idea that has not taken any physical form yet. There could be ideas that don't relate to physical form so those ideas will never take any physical form.
 

paarsurrey

Veteran Member
I believe the answer is NO.
All you can measure are the effects of an Idea.

There are many immeasurable things that cleary exist but cannot be quantified.
This is why Science will always have 1 eye closed, and will never be able to offer an Ultimate Answer to existance.

I agree with you; and sometimes I see that science has both eyes closed.
 

Quintessence

Consults with Trees
Staff member
Premium Member
I agree with you; and sometimes I see that science has both eyes closed.

It is no more guilty of this than any other human paradigm of thought. No humans will have the Ultimate Answer Octavia speaks of. No human is omniscient, omnipresent, and omnipotent. That science can no more readily bypass the limits of being human than any other discipline does not negate its value.
 

McBell

Unbound
I don't think car is an idea;yes, it is a product made on an idea.
My question is about absolute idea that has not taken any physical form yet. There could be ideas that don't relate to physical form so those ideas will never take any physical form.
Define "absolute idea" and give an example of one.
 

Octavia156

OTO/EGC
I don't think car is an idea;yes, it is a product made on an idea.
My question is about absolute idea that has not taken any physical form yet. There could be ideas that don't relate to physical form so those ideas will never take any physical form.

Absolutely.

The Qabalah explains this idea beautifully by splitting existance into 4 worlds.


If applied to the Car:

1. Archetypal World - The idea of Movement
2. Creative World - A device built on comustion design to tranport approx 4 people
3. Formative world - Every possible blueprint of a car that could ever be imagined
4. Material World - An actual car.

This model pefectly demonstrates for me how the Material world is not the be all and end of existance, it is simply the world of 'that which has mainfested'

If you have an idea for your dream house in your head - you can't argue that idea exists - it may not be a physical house, you can still hold it in your minds eye, probably clearer that any house you've ever lived in.

Science is extremely effective at explaining the Material World. But I can't see it escaping Malkuth anytime soon...

Define "absolute idea" and give an example of one.

Any Archetypal idea would be absolute - Everything manifest has descended from an absolute idea.
 
Last edited:

Octavia156

OTO/EGC
It is no more guilty of this than any other human paradigm of thought. No humans will have the Ultimate Answer Octavia speaks of. No human is omniscient, omnipresent, and omnipotent. That science can no more readily bypass the limits of being human than any other discipline does not negate its value.

A great philosopher once pointed out:

I am Omniscient, for naught exists for me unless I know it.

I am Omnipresent, for naught exists where I am not, who fashioned Space as a condition of my consciousness of myself, who am the centre of all, and my circumference the frame of mine own fancy.

I am Omnipotent, for naught occurs save by Necessity, my soul's expression through my Will to be, to do, to suffer the symbols of itself.

:p

You're right in the objective sense of course....
 
Top