lunamoth
Will to love
i would say connection
Connection to what?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
i would say connection
I think you understand why some people feel the need to believe in god.Why would someone feel a need to believe in God?
Connection to what?
:sarcastic You're doing it again.
I don't "understand" your God in any way whatsoever. I don't follow your God in any way whatsoever. I am not "with" your God.
My beliefs are not some different, deficient form of Christianity. They are what they are in their own right.
If you have a theistic worldview, fine... but don't try to impose it on me.
to the present time
like when you're with the people you love most and there is that moment of contact that is mutually understood
when you have those laughing fits that you cannot stop
because the idea of god is a hope for something more than what this chaotic life is...
That's a great answer. Being with those you love, sharing the experience of love and life together.
Do you think everyone feels this way, or must feel this way?
Can you show me evidence for why this is meaningful?
more like living in the moment, and if you're lucky enough, with the ones you love
sadly no..too much anger in the world
i can't speak for anyone else
all i know it's meaningful to me...
And hope is something you don't allow yourself?
Thank you for your answers! So, you would agree that something can be valid without you having to provide evidence to others. No evidence, except your feelings or experience, but it is valid. You can't demonstrate it to anyone else, but you are still completely rational.
Am I understanding you correctly?
Even personal experience that you can't objectively test by some empirical method?experience is evidence, imo
No, it has been many years since I saw that movie.did you steal this argument from the movie "contact" :sarcastic
And from my POV, crediting the good of one person to someone or something else diminshes the person who actually did the good.You don't need to 'understand my God' or 'follow my God.'
I am not trying to change your personal beliefs in any way.
You are being a little sensitive. People write on this board all the time about their beliefs and lack thereof. I'm not trying to proselytize you or anyone. From my POV, if you do good, that good came from God.
I'm not saying that you can't tell us your point of view. I'm saying that I disagree with your point of view... and I have just as much right to say that as you had to give us your point of view in the first place.Disagree - fine. But when you say that I can't write my POV on a board that is supposed to be about discussing religion without it amounting to 'imposing it on you,' then you are guilty of shutting out voices and taking certain topics off the table for discussion.
Not at all! We are made in the image of God - we are good.And from my POV, crediting the good of one person to someone or something else diminshes the person who actually did the good.
To say that a person's good is attributable to God is to imply that the person is less than he really is.
You've made it abundantly clear that my comments are in conflict with your beliefs. I believe in the inherent worth of a person, all persons. Believing that we were made good by a good God who is the source of all good does not in any way say that people are not good.Whether or not you realize it, your comment speaks directly against my own beliefs. I believe in the inherent worth of the person. Your comment suggests that this worth is actually inherent in God and not in the person.
If God is the source of all that is good, and we are made by God, then we are good. It is a very positive position.If God is the source of all that's good, then humanity is intinsically worthless. While I recognize that this is a widely-held view, I still think it's a very negative position.
OK then! :angel2:I'm not saying that you can't tell us your point of view. I'm saying that I disagree with your point of view... and I have just as much right to say that as you had to give us your point of view in the first place.
Even personal experience that you can't objectively test by some empirical method?
No, it has been many years since I saw that movie.
How is it connected?
experience is evidence, imo
did you steal this argument from the movie "contact" :sarcastic
It may be a line from a movie, but it's true.
what is true?
just want to make sure i understand your point.
Experience is evidence, like it or not.
that's what i said by answering a subjective question
empirical evidence...
what is your empirical evidence for what gives your life meaning?
or how she originally put it
what gives your life meaning?
The evidence for what gives my life meaning does not exist outside my own mind and heart. Sorry.