Can you give me an observable evidence that Evolution is true?

[ImmortalFlame]

Except the differences whether of fossils or DNA make all the difference. shared code points to a Shared designer rather a common ancestor.

How, exactly? If all life had completely unique DNA, would that be evidence against a common designer?

 

[Midnight Rain]

Except the differences whether of fossils or DNA make all the difference. shared code points to a Shared designer rather a common ancestor.

It does not. It is a leap of imagination but the conclusion is not at all contingent upon the evidence or vice versa. One could say that all songs in the rock genre are "similar" so they must have all been created by the same artist. Same logic.

But what evidence or reasoning is behind your claim? Walk me through it.

 

[SkepticThinker]

Except the differences whether of fossils or DNA make all the difference. shared code points to a Shared designer rather a common ancestor.

Not really. A designer wouldn't have to keep recycling the same bits of DNA over and over every time an animal was created. Wouldn't you expect to see a bunch of different animals, each unique unto themselves, with their own distinct genetic makeup, if some designer had put it all together?

On the other hand, all animal and plant life sharing some degree of DNA depending on how closely related they are, is exactly what we would expect to see if evolution were true.

 

[metis]

The concept of i.d. isn't even a scientific hypothesis since in order to formulate one there needs to be some evidence to indicate that it could be true. If I say the world is coming to an end tomorrow but cannot provide any objective evidence for this, that is not a scientific hypothesis.

There simply is no objectively-derived evidence that our universe was created by a deity/deities, although that hypothetical possibility does exist.

 

[outhouse]

Except the differences whether of fossils or DNA make all the difference. shared code points to a Shared designer rather a common ancestor.

No it does not

Your posting fallacies in desperation.