Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Easily, There is science behind the proposition that the universe originated from a single point, whereas the existence of god rests on faith. Faith is dependent on personal belief, science is not. So, believe it or not, one's personal convictions don't begin to match the conclusions of scientific inquiry for veracity.and if you can believe the entire universe came from one location....
how then do you refuse the existence of God?
I think you need more than just belief in order for it to be real.I never saw the obituary....
and if you can believe the entire universe came from one location....
how then do you refuse the existence of God?
.....imagine it.....Thief
and if you can believe the entire universe came from one location....
In what manner, do you say, this implies an imaginary being as the agent?
Especially since there was no one around at the time to imagine it?
Thief
and if you can believe the entire universe came from one location....
In what manner, do you say, this implies an imaginary being as the agent?
Especially since there was no one around at the time to imagine it?
if you insist on more than one location....fine...There is also the problem that the universe did NOT come from a single location, even in general relativity. Yes, there was a singularity (in that theory), but that singularity does not have a location (technically, it is an absence, not a thing). And the expansion happens at *all* locations and is not an expansion outward from one location.
This is just semantics, of course, caused by the limitations of our own words, and our cognitive ability to comprehend an infinity.There is also the problem that the universe did NOT come from a single location, even in general relativity. Yes, there was a singularity (in that theory), but that singularity does not have a location (technically, it is an absence, not a thing). And the expansion happens at *all* locations and is not an expansion outward from one location.
This is just semantics, of course, caused by the limitations of our own words, and our cognitive ability to comprehend an infinity.
and there is no starting 'point'?....... for all of the motion we observe?
which came first? ....Spirit?.....or substance?
Since cause and effect are dead, there is no "came first."
This "one location" you speak of exists, it's the universe and we are in it. Space expands in such a way that it doesn't move but rather stretches making one single point into a million or more points in spacetime.I never saw the obituary....
and if you can believe the entire universe came from one location....
how then do you refuse the existence of God?
Quite frankly there may not be an actual point in space to point at and say "this is where the universe is".and there is no starting 'point'?....... for all of the motion we observe
but you could say.....Quite frankly there may not be an actual point in space to point at and say "this is where the universe is".
stretching is a movementThis "one location" you speak of exists, it's the universe and we are in it. Space expands in such a way that it doesn't move but rather stretches making one single point into a million or more points in spacetime.