Checkmate, Evolutionists!

[Sunstone]

If evolution is true, then how come it can't explain how life started? Isn't that like building a house without a foundation? How can the house stand up without a foundation? How can the theory of evolution stand up without explaining the origins of life?

Checkmate, evolutionists!

 

[Sunstone]

Does the cat have your tongue?

 

[LegionOnomaMoi]

If evolution is true, then how come it can't explain how life started? Isn't that like building a house without a foundation? How can the house stand up without a foundation? How can the theory of evolution stand up without explaining the origins of life?

Checkmate, evolutionists!

There is an even bigger flaw with the theory of evolution. The words "theory" and "evolution" as well as the particle "of" didn't exist even a few thousand years ago, let alone millions. Ergo, there couldn't possibly any theory of evolution prior to modern English, and hence there was no theory of evolution before most of life. Thus, the theory of evolution can't explain anything before a few centuries ago at best.

Also, as every structure, configuration, or arrangement of particles/elements/atoms/etc. must be structured, configured, or arranged by an agent, it's ridiculous to conclude that any physical system could exist without a creator. Obviously, that creator didn't require any creator and is exempt from the rule about "foundations". Otherwise, the argument would make even less sense than it does when made by those whose logic you are (amusingly & sarcastically) imitating. Also, it's important not to understand what evolution is in order to completely refute it using "foundation" analogies that don't actually address evolutionary theory. Remember that the next time you not-so-subtly criticize those who argue against virtually universally accepted scientific theory based on misunderstanding it so you don't look so foolish.

Oh...wait....

 

[Smart_Guy]

Does the cat have your tongue?

Yeah, show them who's the boss

I guess the lion had their tongues

 

[Sunstone]

There is an even bigger flaw with the theory of evolution. The words "theory" and "evolution" as well as the particle "of" didn't exist even a few thousand years ago, let alone millions. Ergo, there couldn't possibly any theory of evolution prior to modern English, and hence there was no theory of evolution before most of life. Thus, the theory of evolution can't explain anything before a few centuries ago at best.

That's solid truth, man! There's, like, no way anyone can weasel out of that one! No way, man!

Wantanotherbeer?

 

[TurkeyOnRye]

Im so glad someone posted this thread. I keep forgetting to create it.

And what about monkeys still living on earth? I thought everlutionists said we evolved FROM them!!!! Are they just making this up as they go along??? Lol...

 

[Sunstone]

Don't you evolutionists see? Don't you just see? If evolution is true, then, like, it just got to explain more than, like, it's designed to explain. It just got to, man, because, like, you know, logic or something.

Wantanotherbeer?

 

[Sunstone]

Im so glad someone posted this thread. I keep forgetting to create it.

And what about monkeys still living on earth? I thought everlutionists said we evolved FROM them!!!! Are they just making this up as they go along??? Lol...

Yeah, that's church!

 

[TurkeyOnRye]

Don't you evolutionists see? Don't you just see? If evolution is true, then, like, it just got to explain more than, like, it designed to explain. It just got to, man, because, like, you know, logic or something.

Want some more weed?

Yea exactly....everything has an oragin. Except GOD of coarse, but GOD is exempt from the rule

 

[Sapiens]

That's only number 5 on the list of:

The top 10 signs that you don’t understand evolution at all

5. You think it has anything to do with the origin of life, let alone the origins of the universe.
This is like the king of all straw men, and it’s extremely common. It involves something like the thoroughly debunked theory of spontaneous generation (the idea that life can come from non-life under normal circumstances) being used as evidence against the theory of evolution. Hear me on this, guys: Evolution has nothing to do with the origin of life. The theory of evolution presumes the existence of life, and it is a useless concept in the absence of life. And, as such, scientists’ current confusion over how life started has no impact whatsoever on the validity of the theory of evolution. In the same way, Newtonian physics presumes the existence of the universe; Newton did not have to explain how the universe came to be in order to understand how it operates now. Evolution is no different.


I’ve even seen people use things like stars and planets, or the supposed implausibility of the Big Bang theory (the cosmological model, not the show), to try and cast aspersions on the prevailing theory of how biological organisms on earth have come to look the way they do. These attempts are so nonsensical that I hope I don’t really need to address them here.

Step right up and try again, see if you can be even dumber and get higher on the list.

 

[Sunstone]

Man, you evolutionists are so dumb. Like how can evolution be true if it can't explain how life comes about. Like how? That's like a house without a foundation. Which is like a car without a road. Which is, like, impossible. You just can't have a car without a road. You just can't. Cause logic, man. Cause logic.

Wantanotherbeer?

 

[Sunstone]

That's only number 5 on the list of:

The top 10 signs that you don’t understand evolution at all

5. You think it has anything to do with the origin of life, let alone the origins of the universe.
This is like the king of all straw men, and it’s extremely common. It involves something like the thoroughly debunked theory of spontaneous generation (the idea that life can come from non-life under normal circumstances) being used as evidence against the theory of evolution. Hear me on this, guys: Evolution has nothing to do with the origin of life. The theory of evolution presumes the existence of life, and it is a useless concept in the absence of life. And, as such, scientists’ current confusion over how life started has no impact whatsoever on the validity of the theory of evolution. In the same way, Newtonian physics presumes the existence of the universe; Newton did not have to explain how the universe came to be in order to understand how it operates now. Evolution is no different.


I’ve even seen people use things like stars and planets, or the supposed implausibility of the Big Bang theory (the cosmological model, not the show), to try and cast aspersions on the prevailing theory of how biological organisms on earth have come to look the way they do. These attempts are so nonsensical that I hope I don’t really need to address them here.

Step right up and try again, see if you can be even dumber and get higher on the list.

You haven't been drinking, have you? I can tell, man, because, you're like, making sense. But that's cool! I'm cool with that!

Want a beer?

 

[TurkeyOnRye]

That's only number 5 on the list of:

The top 10 signs that you don’t understand evolution at all

5. You think it has anything to do with the origin of life, let alone the origins of the universe.
This is like the king of all straw men, and it’s extremely common. It involves something like the thoroughly debunked theory of spontaneous generation (the idea that life can come from non-life under normal circumstances) being used as evidence against the theory of evolution. Hear me on this, guys: Evolution has nothing to do with the origin of life. The theory of evolution presumes the existence of life, and it is a useless concept in the absence of life. And, as such, scientists’ current confusion over how life started has no impact whatsoever on the validity of the theory of evolution. In the same way, Newtonian physics presumes the existence of the universe; Newton did not have to explain how the universe came to be in order to understand how it operates now. Evolution is no different.


I’ve even seen people use things like stars and planets, or the supposed implausibility of the Big Bang theory (the cosmological model, not the show), to try and cast aspersions on the prevailing theory of how biological organisms on earth have come to look the way they do. These attempts are so nonsensical that I hope I don’t really need to address them here.

Step right up and try again, see if you can be even dumber and get higher on the list.

I think you're forgetting that everlution is still only a THEORY. Even teh scientists don't fully believe in it.

 

[LegionOnomaMoi]

I think you're forgetting that everlution is still only a THEORY. Even teh scientists don't fully believe in it.

Evolution isn't even a theorem, let alone a proof. At best it's a corollary, and a corollary to the proven theorem that god creates foundations.

 

[lewisnotmiller]

I'm sick of all this misinformation. Everlution is a FACT. I hereby offer the following proof.

1. The universe is incredibly complex.
2. The chances of all this complexity happening completely BY ACCIDENT are ridiculously astronomical.
3. My mother always told me I'm one in a googleplex.
4. Ergo, everlution is fact.

 

[Sunstone]

Still not convinced, you evolutionists? Are you still not convinced? Then consider this: Evolution is like a beer. And abiogenisus is like...siz like...like...the branch of a tree that a bird sitz on when he's drinking your beer. Yeah, like that. And a bird can't exist without a branch to perch on. Just as a house can't exist without a foundation. Just like a car can't exist without a road. Just like evolution can't exist without sumbody explainin' abiogenisus ta us.

 

[Sunstone]

Evolution isn't even a theorem, let alone a proof.

Poof? Did you say you jest poofed? Tee hee. That's funny you poofed in my thread. Tee hee.

 

[Smart_Guy]

Well, I do believe in evolution, but not in the monkey business way. I mean, it makes sense to have higher percentage of people with more body hair in hot areas than others for example.

I wonder if humans will evolve to something else millions of years from now.

 

[LegionOnomaMoi]

That's funny you poofed in my thread. Tee hee.

That was a typo. I meant to type "pooped".

 

[Sunstone]

I wonder if humans will evolve to something else millions of years from now.

If humans get through the next 1000, then they might make it another million years.