• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Children Should be Banned

Erebus

Well-Known Member
I've been thinking recently about the "think of the children" argument that crops up from time to time and I reckon I've found a good middle ground that will work for everybody. Why don't we just ban children?

Think about it, without children the hyper moral nannies of the world wouldn't have a leg to stand on. We wouldn't have to ban anything in case a child catches a glimpse of it and immediately transforms into Jeffrey Dahmer because there wouldn't be any children around. This is just the tip of the iceberg, allow me to show you some of the ways in which banning children will improve the world.

No more babies on planes. Everybody hates sitting near a shrieking, stinking little subhuman on a cramped plane. The ban on children will eliminate this entirely.

Christmas will be a hell of a lot cheaper. Instead of buying your little brat a pile of toys you can spend your money on something interesting like cigars, whiskey or sex toys.

Your house will never reek of vomit, faeces and off milk again... unless you're into that sort of thing.

Overpopulation will no longer be a threat. Without children constantly draining resources humanity can avoid that bleak day in which it has to form into cannibalistic tribes in order to survive. Saying NO to children is saying NO to post-apocalyptic cannibals.

No more children's TV. All those brightly coloured abominations would make way for more programmes about murder, sodomy and interesting things like that.

No more paedophiles. If you oppose the ban on children you're supporting the paedophiles. You monster.

No more children on bicycles bumping into you and scratching your car.

No more teenage temper tantrums and god-awful whining "music". Everybody will be an adult and as such will be less angsty and better conversationalists.

No more child exploitation. Think of the children.

I honestly can't think of any reason why children haven't been banned already, it's just all benefits with no negatives if we got rid of them. Please, if you're a decent, moral human being who is opposed to the atrocities associated with letting children exist then write to your MPs, to your politicians and to anybody who'll listen and get them to enforce the ban on children.

BAN CHILDREN, DON'T SUPPORT PAEDOPHILIA!
 

Brickjectivity

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
Children are always dirty, no matter how many times you wash them! Some refuse to eat their broccoli. If you give them vanilla, they want chocolate. If you give them chocolate they want strawberry.

article-1120002-0042E63200000258-281_470x368.jpg
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
I won't go so far as saying there should be no children.
But I do say that they should be in Chinese restaurants (& Asian restaurants in general).
Children plied with noodles & dumplings are well dressed, well fed, & well behaved.
 

Twilight Hue

Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
But without childern, politicians won't get elected.

Oh...wait a minute. Thats a good thing.

Nvrmind.
 

Sha'irullah

رسول الآلهة
I believe my personal plan for international castration should be implemented for the next 2 generations to promote a more cleaner slate for humanity so we can repopulate in accordance to genetic and social superiority.

Children are now being raised under the idiocy of the adults in society as Luciano Pavarotti once said. Adults are at fault and the cessation of child birthing must end temporarily in order for the adult populous to correct its behavior and better society before continuing bearing the progenitors of the future.
 

NoraSariah

Active Member
But without children, there wouldn't be anymore of the kid's dinner specials for $4.99 that you'd order for yourself. OH THE HUMANITY!
 

michel

Administrator Emeritus
Staff member
I believe that children aged 1 year and older should "disappear" (to be taken care of away from the parents), and returned to the parents aged 17 or 18, by which time they are well behaved, much quieter, and (hopefully) reasonably mature.
 

Brickjectivity

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
LewisNotMiller said:
Surely we're getting rid of them at the same time? Would seem like a half-completed job otherwise.
In fact its actually a tax on youth in some places, such as Florida where the majority are retirees apparently. What better way to rid ourselves of the youth than through taxation?
 

Erebus

Well-Known Member
Surely we're getting rid of them at the same time? Would seem like a half-completed job otherwise.

Well naturally the elderly are next, but let's take it one step at a time. Children would have to go first as they're a detriment to us all, but luckily they don't get to vote either so they'll be easier to get at ;)
 

Brickjectivity

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
Lewisnotmiller said:
Hang on...I'm confused now. Is it reasonable for us to deride them as freeloaders AND worry they're going to take our jobs?
Yes, they are like immigrants, but they come into the country without even crossing the border. You think immigrants are trouble, but its children you should worry about.
 
Top