So they (Pauline-Christianity people) need to correct themselves, please. Right?
Regards
The point of this thread is that nobody or at least Christians do not need to correct themselves.
As was mentioned in the other thread, a universalist view.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
So they (Pauline-Christianity people) need to correct themselves, please. Right?
Regards
Just because someone uses a certain label doesn't make a belief valid.Just to support the true flexibility of the Christian religion, one can be an atheist and a Christian.
Every man today who is open to experience knows that God is absent, but only the Christian knows that God is dead, that the death of God is a final and irrevocable event and that God's death has actualized in our history a new and liberated humanity.-Altizer, Thomas J. J. The Gospel of Christian Atheism. Philadelphia: The Westminster Press, 1966.
I suppose Jesus died to free man from God?
Another view is that God never existed but Jesus can still be used as a moral guide.
Should religion be so flexible?
Just because someone uses a certain label doesn't make a belief valid.
When it is unreasonable, please. Right?It's a belief.
How do you make a belief invalid?
Why absolve them from correction, please? What harm being correct does to Christians, please. Right?The point of this thread is that nobody or at least Christians do not need to correct themselves.
As was mentioned in the other thread, a universalist view.
Just because you believe something doesn't make it possible.It's a belief.
How do you make a belief invalid?
Just because you believe something doesn't make it possible.
When it is unreasonable, please. Right?
Regards
To believe in Jesus is to believe in his Father also. The Gospel of Jesus was based squarely on the individual in relationship with the Father as the central thing in life.Just to support the true flexibility of the Christian religion, one can be an atheist and a Christian.
Every man today who is open to experience knows that God is absent, but only the Christian knows that God is dead, that the death of God is a final and irrevocable event and that God's death has actualized in our history a new and liberated humanity.-Altizer, Thomas J. J. The Gospel of Christian Atheism. Philadelphia: The Westminster Press, 1966.
I suppose Jesus died to free man from God?
Another view is that God never existed but Jesus can still be used as a moral guide.
Should religion be so flexible?
That is always my intention. Right?Sure, if you can prove it is unreasonable to the believer.
To believe in Jesus is to believe in his Father also. The Gospel of Jesus was based squarely on the individual in relationship with the Father as the central thing in life.
Why absolve them from correction, please? What harm being correct does to Christians, please. Right?
Regards
What if it is their intention to prove to you that you are wrong about your belief?That is always my intention. Right?
Regards
Legally yes all such flexibility should be allowed. Would I give such nonsense serious consideration? No. If Christ is in opposition to God there is no Christian religion.Just to support the true flexibility of the Christian religion, one can be an atheist and a Christian.
Every man today who is open to experience knows that God is absent, but only the Christian knows that God is dead, that the death of God is a final and irrevocable event and that God's death has actualized in our history a new and liberated humanity.-Altizer, Thomas J. J. The Gospel of Christian Atheism. Philadelphia: The Westminster Press, 1966.
I suppose Jesus died to free man from God?
Another view is that God never existed but Jesus can still be used as a moral guide.
Should religion be so flexible?
They may.What if it is their intention to prove to you that you are wrong about your belief?
In a world ruled by Satan, it would be expected that the world's religions are not only that flexible, but adulterated. 1 John 5:19; Revelation 12:9Just to support the true flexibility of the Christian religion, one can be an atheist and a Christian.
Every man today who is open to experience knows that God is absent, but only the Christian knows that God is dead, that the death of God is a final and irrevocable event and that God's death has actualized in our history a new and liberated humanity.-Altizer, Thomas J. J. The Gospel of Christian Atheism. Philadelphia: The Westminster Press, 1966.
I suppose Jesus died to free man from God?
Another view is that God never existed but Jesus can still be used as a moral guide.
Should religion be so flexible?
Oh, how I wish it were so .In a world ruled by Satan,
Just to support the true flexibility of the Christian religion, one can be an atheist and a Christian.
Every man today who is open to experience knows that God is absent, but only the Christian knows that God is dead, that the death of God is a final and irrevocable event and that God's death has actualized in our history a new and liberated humanity.-Altizer, Thomas J. J. The Gospel of Christian Atheism. Philadelphia: The Westminster Press, 1966.
I suppose Jesus died to free man from God?
Another view is that God never existed but Jesus can still be used as a moral guide.
Should religion be so flexible?
Just to support the true flexibility of the Christian religion, one can be an atheist and a Christian.
Every man today who is open to experience knows that God is absent, but only the Christian knows that God is dead, that the death of God is a final and irrevocable event and that God's death has actualized in our history a new and liberated humanity.-Altizer, Thomas J. J. The Gospel of Christian Atheism. Philadelphia: The Westminster Press, 1966.
I suppose Jesus died to free man from God?
Another view is that God never existed but Jesus can still be used as a moral guide.
Should religion be so flexible?