As I stated long before, religion bears little 'proof', and will be dismissed by the sheer size of science in comparison (however vastly unproven). Prove that science is right, or let me state what I want on science as you do religion.
Prove that science is right?
Are we talking actual science or say Kent Hovind's idea of science?
If science cannot be touched in this debate, than there is really no reason for this thread to exist other than to bash Christians. Part of religious proof is the lack of proof going against it.
Who said science cannot be touched?
I mean, other than you?
It is not my fault you have nothing to show for religion that science can confirm.
It is not my fault that you feel the need lower science to the same faith based level as religion in order to present anything.
Getting all technical and absurd just because I mention the idea shows how biased you are, and really shows your true intent of being on this thread.
Cry me a river.
I am not the one who made the claim that I am not biased.
If memory serves, it was YOU who made the claim.
Here's a good example on why science must be examined for credibility: There is much indication of a worldwide flood in the past, but it doesn't fit into any hypothesis of evolution. A flood can account for why there are fish fossils on top of mountains, but it does not fit into the hypothesis of a geologist. A flood can account for fossil fuels, but that doesn't fit into the quite false idea that they must take 1000's or even million years to form.
I will have to ask you to support these claims:
- the evidence of a world wide flood
- how the idea that it takes 1000's or even millions of years for fossil fuels to form is a "false idea"
Science cannot give any realistic conclusion in lieu of religion, and yet non-religious people demand it of theists.
Conclusion for what?
"god did it" is not an explanation.
It's quite asinine. These religions were around long before all this scientific intrigue.
Nice appeal to longevity.
It's not our responsibility to prove anything, but rather the other way around if you want to be technical and absurd about it.
What a load of ****.
It is the responsibility of those making the claim to support their claim.
So please either debate or stop with the nonsense.
Ball is now your court.
Just keep in mind that "god did it" is not an explanation for anything outside of "Christian Science".