The exact same language is used by Samuel and Joshua to the nation of Israel to present themselves before the Lord to hear Gods word, not in Heaven on earth
Oh really? Get the exact quote. And it says "Sons of G-d" right? It doesn't matter if it says they present themselves, that's not the issue here.
In Deutoromy 31:14 God uses the same language to tell Moses and Joshua to present themselves at the tabernacle to receive a charge
Talk about misquoting Scripture, Deut 31:14 says nothing regarding "Sons of G-d". Nice try. Humans can present themselves to G-d just like Angels, this doesn't mean to say that it's exclusive to one class.
And quit misquoting, its says Satan came among them, not that he was part of the group.
It doesn't say that Satan wasn't one of them, in the Hebrew it merely mentions that Satan went with them, whether he was one or not. Either way, the Septuagint, which predates the Masoretic text, calls them Angels directly.
In fact, the exact word is that Satan went "Among" them. "Among".
8432 [e]bə·ṯō·w·ḵām.בְּתוֹכָֽם׃among
Yes, "Among". This can mean "a part of that group". So you cannot say with certainty whether or not he was one of them "among" as in "part of" or just alongside.
Genesis also uses the same word for angels as Job 4:18
"Messengers" is a description of what Angels are. "Messengers" is not their being. It is their purpose/job. "Sons of G-d" is their being. Once again, "Angel of" or "His angels" is a posessive case, which implies a relation and purpose. "Sons of G-d" is a nominative as a stand alone indication of what they are.
Dont waste my time with commentaries
Don't waste YOUR time? Okay, so you admit that
NO ONE ELSE shares your opinion on this that you can find? Good. Meanwhile, I have many ancient commentators who do agree, if you think you know better than them and the Septuagint as if you know the language better, good for you! Hopefully you will admit that the Septuagint predates the Hebrew on this. I'll take the Septuagint over your unbacked opinion.
Now back to Jude, care to quote Jude 1:6? That's not even the part that quotes 1 Enoch. And 2 Peter 2:4 while you're at it.
Basically, your argument that humans can present themselves before the Father somehow disqualifies Angels from doing so in context, does not fly. My interpretation is backed by the earliest known copies of the "Old Testament' and virtually everyone who has commentated on it until Medieval times (disregarding the Sethian Gnostics), yours has.....none. I'll bet you didn't even know that the Septuagint predates the Masoretic until I told you.
