• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Classical Theism

Status
Not open for further replies.

ThePainefulTruth

Romantic-Cynic
This has been an interesting study is the arrogance and ignorance infecting the atheist community in this forum.

You just can't stop oversimplifying your opposition. Why, to make yourself a victim? I don't know how many are atheists, but I'm not one of them and never have been.
 

sayak83

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
This has been an interesting study is the arrogance and ignorance infecting the atheist community in this forum. It began with a simple question and the first response was an attempt to correct my wording with "more properly termed classical monotheism." That should have been my first clue that I'd be dealing with people who have no interest in the subject matter. The second clue was the insistence that the subject matter is dealing with a being alongside other beings, even to the point of declaring that nature and the God of religion are one and the same while denying the latter on the grounds that it's an "other."

Strange, very strange. When I read book like Love of Knowledge, The Psychic Grid and The Book of Not Knowing and then watch atheist minds here carrying memory-beliefs like chunks of concrete and calling it "wisdom," I wonder if they are even sane. Even as antitheists claim to be a happy and satisfied lot, there is something sad in those claims, as though they are trying to convince themselves that their lives are worth living. It's "Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye are like unto whited sepulchres, which indeed appear beautiful outward, but are within full of dead men's bones, and of all uncleanness" all over again.
This has been an interesting study of how fluffy, vague, hand-wavy and outright incoherent thinking is often passed on as profound sounding sophistical wisdom. What do people get out of such pretenses I wonder. A boost for a false puffed up ego. Sad very sad.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top