• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

CNN is ...

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
I understand what you're saying. If a culture within the industry develops which organically limits information, then the flow of information is not free, right?
I guess it's similar to how industrial cultures develop where a product's ingredients or manufacturing process isn't 100% divulged to the public. While it's not legally restricted, it's still ultimately wrong in the ideal sense.
The issue isn't whether the word "free" applies with precision.
I'm pointing out that we have a freer environment, even if it's the result of the media rather than government loosening things up.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
It also showed how accessible this president could be given the proper enticement. (BTW he was the president he surely had more choices than Monica, no offense meant. I guess there's no accounting for taste.)
It does show how a prez can be made vulnerable to undue political manipulation.
His trysting choices are actually quite limited because few gals would be available with privacy.

As things have turned out, she has become the more respectable of the two.
 
Last edited:
Top