sooda
Veteran Member
I can't tell if you are being serious or ironic.
Kanye isn't playing with a full deck.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I can't tell if you are being serious or ironic.
Context my dear friend, context.Then why on Earth did you bring up Hillary? Now you admitted to at best raising a red herring. Let's try to think logically instead of emotionally.
Nope. However I am not merely considering my own view. Someone taking part in illegal conduct such as financial could see a "win" as a indication of a lawyer's willingness to defend someone considered guilty in the public court of opinions and with the ability to get a client out of charges. Stop thinking like you, start thinking like a criminal needing a lawyer. Lawyers are willing to represent people the lawyer considers guilty but they do it anyways be it based on the principle of due process like public defenders or cash cases like private lawyers for various high profile convictions.
Not if one is interested in a criminal clientele. Not all lawyers are saints.
Of course lawyers defend guilty people.. I was at the top of my class in civil litigation so I do know a little... but if a client won't pay you or listen to you, why bother?
That's what I said (in different words).No.
People see what they want to see, need to see, or love to see.
Yes, sometimes. After all, that's kind of what happens when you get members of a criminal organization to turn state's evidence, isn't it?A convicted self admitted liar says something and this should change someones mind?
And you are probably correct...unfortunately. If I've learned anything from my years of discussing how people believe (rather than seek to know and understand), it's that truth, no matter how compelling, can't change the mind of a "true believer."I wonder if this will be a dealbreaker for his base...I suspect not.
Mad? no, but when that someone else is a convicted, self admitted liar that probably has an axe to grind makes a lot of unsubstantiated claims about the person he may feel had something to do with his conviction, yes I will call their claims into question.
You ever wonder about the timing of these things?
Trump speaking with N Korea-- Cohen "Trump is racist"
Trump set to have a meeting with Putin- 12 indictments against alleged Russian trolls one day before
It's just sad that Mr Cohen has already shown that he has no honesty or integrity.
How did the US electoral system get any of these folks in to such important and powerful positions?
Is it time for the USA to look more carefully in to itself?
Problem is, it's just not all that compelling to me that for the most part, Presidents (or in my case, Prime Ministers) are all that directly linked to how the economy or social progress actually turns out. These things are immensely complex, and the delay in being able to see the outcome of any policy is usually many months, more often years.What's going on here is a fundamental different basis for voting.
Approximately....
The anti-Trumpettes need a candidate whom they like & respect.
(Although it's odd that Hillary would fill that bill.) To them,
it doesn't matter as much what one would achieve in office.
But some of us vote based upon the effect a candidate would
have in office. If the net effect is good, then even a horrible
candidate would be better than a nice one who'd do a bad job.
So the anti-Trumpettes continue to rail & fulminate against Trump
personally, almost entirely ignoring what's going on with government
policy. All they care about is that they hate him. There's no defeating
that feeling because it's entirely legitimate.
Two very different perspectives....never the twain shall meet.
Anyways, if people are going to accuse anybody of anything, the best would be to catch them red-handed at being a racist for all the public to see.
Depends on what evidence Cohen can provide. I've personally no reason to trust anything Cohen says, or any other lawyer/politician says for that matter. People can say whatever they want. IMO no point in listening unless they can provide evidence to back up their statements.
Donald J. Trump has employed people of all races, which proves he's hardly racist. ....
I don't credit or blame leaders for all things which happen during their reign.Problem is, it's just not all that compelling to me that for the most part, Presidents (or in my case, Prime Ministers) are all that directly linked to how the economy or social progress actually turns out. These things are immensely complex, and the delay in being able to see the outcome of any policy is usually many months, more often years.
Some things do appear to be independent of individual Presidents,Think of the weather. In our hemisphere, temperature and climate follow the sun by a couple of months. When the sun is at it's lowest point in the sky (Dec 21), you can expect the coldest weather about 2 months later, in mid to late February. Same in summer, when the sun is highest on June 21, the hottest days tend to be late August.
And these are physical outcomes of physical effects. Complex economic and social effects move more slowly, except possibly in declarations of war or emergency, which can speed everything up, but at immense economic and social cost, usually requiring a lot of healing afterwards.
Nope, you really have no clue as to how Edwards got off.Wrong. Edwards use 1.2 million of campaign money to cover up an affair. The same thing people claim Trump did. Edward's won his case. Try again.
Optics.
Not an excuse.Context my dear friend, context.
Did you see the video?
But... but... but he has black supporters! He even lets them sit near him at rallies!I’ve been saying it. Others have been saying it, but I guess the Trump base can’t hear it. Mr. Cohen can you speak louder for the people in back please?