Wearing a kippah or a turban in an ID photo does not look foolish. A person wearing a colander does.
If you say so.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Wearing a kippah or a turban in an ID photo does not look foolish. A person wearing a colander does.
This ↑ Unless it compromises their identity, which would included hiding their hair or lack thereof, and its color---a wig would also not be allowed unless it's worn all the time---I see no problem with it.People should be able to wear any headgear they want so long as you can identify them.
Seems more like a 'same old thing' to me. That's what I'm getting at. He isn't wearing religious headgear. So where's the discrimination he is supposedly protesting?
Well, that moves us to how does something qualify as a religion, then?
Is it childish, silly & disrespectful of both government & organized religion?If I were an atheist I would feel really embarrassed by this ridiculousness. I can't wait to see how they are going to rationalize it. Because guess what? It is not rational.
It's more like a victory for freedom of religious expression than making religion look ridiculous.
It is a valid statement, but I see nothing more than bigotry when someone wants to protests religious headgear. What's the big idea? It's not like anyone is forcing others to wear a turban, hijaab, yarmulke, wimple, or a silly colander. But as others have pointed out, it seems to further the right to wear headgear than protest it.
If I were an atheist I would feel really embarrassed by this ridiculousness.
It's not so ridiculous when compared to religious hats.
Maybe the OP should have asked whether religious hats are a legitimate religious statement or just religious people acting childish in order to establish a base line for measurement of the responses to its main question.
Personally, the above hats are not to my taste, but I don't have anything against people wearing them.
This ↑ Unless it compromises their identity, which would included hiding their hair or lack thereof, and its color---a wig would also not be allowed unless it's worn all the time---I see no problem with it.
I wonder what various DMVs around the world do with women who (for religious reasons) wear
a veil which obscures her face? If worn in the picture, it would defeat the purpose entirely.
I.don't think women are allowed to drive.I wonder what various DMVs around the world do with women who (for religious reasons) wear
a veil which obscures her face? If worn in the picture, it would defeat the purpose entirely.
I wear a beard-veil these days so that no one can identify me with my photo ID. It doesn't work. They keep selling me beer anyway. I even wear a hat. Nothing seems to work.
There is a difference between someone dressing in accordance to their religious beliefs and a professional pushing their beliefs on someone. And what does religion matter, so long as the doctor is qualified? I couldn't tell you the religious beliefs of a single doctor I have seen because it doesn't matter (and my religion apparently wasn't a concern to them).There is another thread, a couple of weeks ago, where we were discussing whether a medical doctor had the right to communicate his religious beliefs to his patients. I think it is in the best interests of the patient to know in advance as opposed to having to ask, but there are those who think it could create some sort of pressure.
When I worked at a gas station, I carded an Amish kid who wanted cigarettes. His ID had no picture on it.I wonder what various DMVs around the world do with women who (for religious reasons) wear
a veil which obscures her face? If worn in the picture, it would defeat the purpose entirely.