• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Communist China is just plain brutal and sick.

Twilight Hue

Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
Two epidemic-prevention workers killed a dog and the whole country is brutal and sick? Huh?

A country is best judged by the way it treats its animals.

I think many in China are outraged givin the attention this has.

And yea, Communist China is severely brutal with animals.
 

Lain

Well-Known Member
A country is best judged by the way it treats its animals.

I think many in China are outraged givin the attention this has.

And yea, Communist China is severely brutal with animals.

If that's the case then every country has been brutal and sick in my opinion. Just go to any factory farm, or anywhere where people hunt for sport, etc. It's amazing to me that people who are typically fine with brutal treatment of animals (not you necessarily, maybe you are consistent, I'd think you were as a Buddhist) bat an eye when one single dog is beaten.
 

sun rise

The world is on fire
Premium Member
A country is best judged by the way it treats its animals.

I think many in China are outraged givin the attention this has.

And yea, Communist China is severely brutal with animals.

In this country freedom is all about we can do anything to animals we want to because the government is evil and stops people from doing what God wants them to do - be cruel to animals.

The only difference is that in China the government is doing it while here it's free enterprise cruelty.
 

Twilight Hue

Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
If that's the case then every country has been brutal and sick in my opinion. Just go to any factory farm, or anywhere where people hunt for sport, etc. It's amazing to me that people who are typically fine with brutal treatment of animals (not you necessarily, maybe you are consistent, I'd think you were as a Buddhist) bat an eye when one single dog is beaten.
I'm against excessive brutality . This was a pet owned by a family. It wasn't raised to be eaten.

This was clearly a sport killing and is a reason why it got the attention it did.

I'm not against killing for food, but against methodology that isn't nessesary when more humane means are employable.
 

amorphous_constellation

Well-Known Member
If that's the case then every country has been brutal and sick in my opinion. Just go to any factory farm, or anywhere where people hunt for sport, etc. It's amazing to me that people who are typically fine with brutal treatment of animals (not you necessarily, maybe you are consistent, I'd think you were as a Buddhist) bat an eye when one single dog is beaten.

Not all factory farms are equal. There are engineers like temple grandin who severely minimized animal stress. Also, I tend to think that in many older nature based religions, killing an animal to eat it was far more of a sacred act, making it an obligation to weep and pray to the spirit of the animal you harvest. Our combination of variable secular indifference, and people oriented religion, may allow more indifference
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
In this country freedom is all about we can do anything to animals we want to because the government is evil and stops people from doing what God wants them to do - be cruel to animals.

The only difference is that in China the government is doing it while here it's free enterprise cruelty.
An anti-free enterprise tirade, eh.
Oh, you socialists.
I'm surprised that you're unaware of limitations
here regarding treatment of animals.
In additional to national regulation...
Animal Welfare Act | Animal Welfare Information Center | NAL | USDA
....states also regulate treatment.
 

We Never Know

No Slack
A country is best judged by the way it treats its animals.

I think many in China are outraged givin the attention this has.

And yea, Communist China is severely brutal with animals.

Here in the states some people see it bad to raise hogs, chickens, beef, turkey, etc only to slaughter them for food.

Eat a cow and its great steak and hamburger.
Eat a horse and its taboo.

We value some while not others.
 

night912

Well-Known Member
Two epidemic-prevention workers killed a dog and the whole country is brutal and sick? Huh?

A country is best judged by the way it treats its animals.

I think many in China are outraged givin the attention this has.

And yea, Communist China is severely brutal with animals.

I'm against excessive brutality . This was a pet owned by a family. It wasn't raised to be eaten.

This was clearly a sport killing and is a reason why it got the attention it did.

I'm not against killing for food, but against methodology that isn't nessesary when more humane means are employable.
You've contradicted yourself. The dog's owner, a person living in China like the two workers, doesn't appear to have treated the dog brutally. By your reasoning, then China is a caring and loving country, the opposite of what you said since the owner didn't kill the dog and has actually provided food and shelter for the dog. You have just demonstrated that you are suffering from cognitive dissonance.

And if you're going to argue that the owner doesn't work for the government, the ones beating the dog does, then you would have to explain why your argument and reasoning regarding China, why those two workers were fired after learning of what happened. And evidence is needed if your reason that the workers was only fired was due to the appeasement of the population.

This was clearly a sport killing and is a reason why it got the attention it did.

I'm not against killing for food, but against methodology that isn't nessesary when more humane means are employable.

How and/or what is the difference between sport killing for food and simply just killing for food?
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
The point is regulation is one thing - enforcement is another and good behavior is something else again.
I sense exaggeration.
You aren't claiming that enforcement doesn't exist here, are you?
In my area it's taken very seriously.
But perhaps CA is rife with illegality regarding animal welfare.
 
Last edited:
Top