ametist
Active Member
He plagiarized the bible.
His only sources was the bible and oral history from the bible.
The fact he used previous mythology shows no divine inspiration at all.
:biglaugh:
Nice! what great methodology, some guy who is plagairizing pervious mythology almost 2000 years in the past has historical credibiliy
Please dude, that is embarrassing.
We have direct evidence, we have factual evidence of their Canaanite heritage.
Moses has no historicity as ever existing, and he factually did not exist as written. There is not one word in the koran that is accurate here. Nor the bible the koran was plagiarized from.
Israelites evolved from displace Canaanites and other Semitic speaking people who factualy used Canaanite mythology, deities, pottery, and alphabet.
Maybe you dont understand the meaning of "factual" or plagairized.
He plagiarized the bible for what reason? To bring additional does and dont does? There are extra does and dont does that arent in bible but in quran you know? what kind of a motive is this? Do you think somebody would sit to write a book for 23 years? the guy waited for 23 years to complete 'his stolen mythology'. What kind of a slow stealing is it? Does it sound logical to you that you will wait for 23 years to build the main text of your doctirine while it is already out there waiting to be stolen for 2000 years? and how come in that book you happen to still give legitimacy to many previous prohpets and books heard and unheard, in practice or not?
This isnt a thread to discuss quran or muhammed. you asked me how i understand moses exists and i gave you my reasons.
Last edited: