Otherright
Otherright
Do you believe that the Penrose-Hameroff Orch-OR theory of consciousness? Do you think that consciousness can be measured at a quantum level, or that it exists at a quantum level?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Do you believe that the Penrose-Hameroff Orch-OR theory of consciousness? Do you think that consciousness can be measured at a quantum level, or that it exists at a quantum level?
I believe this is the right track of fully understanding consciousness as well as answer many questions (but of course with questions answered there are always more questions created). Quantum measurement would be IMO the best option from what I understand so far (I haven't finished reading the entire thesis). What I really like about the theory is that it lends a hand to how we can achieve a Class-1 Society.Do you believe that the Penrose-Hameroff Orch-OR theory of consciousness? Do you think that consciousness can be measured at a quantum level, or that it exists at a quantum level?
I still believe consciousness is an emergent feature of complex neurological systems. So out of fashion.
I still believe consciousness is an emergent feature of complex neurological systems. So out of fashion.
I agree.Right, but that complex neurological system extends down into the quantum levels. The full properties of consciousness just aren't being observed at the higher levels. Its only natural to look at the quantum level for answers.
What dopp said. Would you mind summarizing?Do you believe that the Penrose-Hameroff Orch-OR theory of consciousness? Do you think that consciousness can be measured at a quantum level, or that it exists at a quantum level?
opcorn:What dopp said. Would you mind summarizing?
Sure, but so does every other model if there is a need to carry it that far. What I find troubling with this idea is that it mixes scientific terminology into what it rather obviously a way of thinking that is well within the arena of religious mythology. The product is a non-testable proclamation about "souls" being "quantum events" or "quantum level phenomena." In everything I've read so far, I've yet to see anybody explain what that even means, let alone explain how it constitutes a workable, explanatory model for consciousness.Right, but that complex neurological system extends down into the quantum levels. The full properties of consciousness just aren't being observed at the higher levels. Its only natural to look at the quantum level for answers.
doppelgänger;2502156 said:Sure, but so does every other model if there is a need to carry it that far. What I find troubling with this idea is that it mixes scientific terminology into what it rather obviously a way of thinking that is well within the arena of religious mythology. The product is a non-testable proclamation about "souls" being "quantum events" or "quantum level phenomena." In everything I've read so far, I've yet to see anybody explain what that even means, let alone explain how it constitutes a workable, explanatory model for consciousness.
I don't have any expectation that they would. But that's nevertheless the claim of this theory. It doesn't accomplish that goal from what I can tell.Do you expect anyone could provide a workable, explanatory model for consciousness? I'm just confused about what exactly people think needs to be explained about it.