That's what I heard in her rebuttal to SOTU address. It really was pathetic, wasn't it?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
That's what I heard in her rebuttal to SOTU address. It really was pathetic, wasn't it?
I was wondering if she even knew which party she was supposed to be supporting.That's what I heard in her rebuttal to SOTU address. It really was pathetic, wasn't it?
Then your entire post history belongs in the jokes section.It's quite a hobby isn't it?
This really belongs in the jokes section.
Beware of forum rules on personal attacks.Then your entire post history belongs in the jokes section.
Why is Tobey Maguire in there?
I somehow misread SOTU as STFU and was really confused for a sec...That's what I heard in her rebuttal to SOTU address. It really was pathetic, wasn't it?
No, it wasn't a personal attack. By your own criteria they would be designated to the joke section.Beware of forum rules on personal attacks.
Yes it was. It's clearly and obviously a personal attack.No, it wasn't a personal attack. By your own criteria they would be designated to the joke section.
Yes it was. It's clearly and obviously a personal attack.
Yours...
"Then your entire post history belongs in the jokes section".
Mine....
"This really belongs in the jokes section".
Note the difference.
Partisan sensationalism?Again, I'm talking about your own implied reason; partisan sensationalization. That's your shtick.
I don't deny what it is, but a lot of your posts are of similar nature, which was my point.Partisan sensationalism?
Like this clearly non partisan, non sensational thread title?
Conservatives brought to their knees by cauliflower
Yes, clearly this is just me alone.