• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Consider that Capitalism is the Real Problem

Kilgore Trout

Misanthropic Humanist
I prefer Capitalism, because I realize there is no system that won't result in the many having little and being controlled by the few. But, at least with capitalism, I have a chance.

I do realize that many other people don't have the capacity to take advantage of this chance, so I wouldn't expect them to support a system where competition exists.
 

Stevicus

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
That doesn't make sense. Their communist rivals still have access to weaponry and soldiers. Backed by China, as N Korea was and still is.

Both sides had weapons and soldiers, and both South Korea and South Vietnam had more people than their northern counterparts, so they had the ability to build even larger armies. The Chinese didn't get involved in Korea until after the US did, and even then, the Chinese didn't have enough weapons to arm all their troops.
 

Corvus

Feathered eyeball connoisseur
Both sides had weapons and soldiers, and both South Korea and South Vietnam had more people than their northern counterparts, so they had the ability to build even larger armies. The Chinese didn't get involved in Korea until after the US did, and even then, the Chinese didn't have enough weapons to arm all their troops.
Having more weapons and troops doesn't guarantee victory. The RAF proved that against the Luftwaffe fairly well.
 

Stevicus

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
Having more weapons and troops doesn't guarantee victory. The RAF proved that against the Luftwaffe fairly well.

Well, in their case, they also had the RN, which was far superior to the Kriegsmarine. The RAF also had radar, which was an invaluable piece of technology for its time. It was also helpful that the Luftwaffe was led by an incompetent drug addict.

Even if the Germans had won the air battle, there was still the matter of getting ground troops across the Channel, which was no easy feat. Their plan involved using a number of Rhine river barges which were not really suitable for the choppy waters of the English Channel.
 

Corvus

Feathered eyeball connoisseur
Even if the Germans had won the air battle, there was still the matter of getting ground troops across the Channel, which was no easy feat. Their plan involved using a number of Rhine river barges which were not really suitable for the choppy waters of the English Channel.
Absolutely. The English planned to set the sea on fire too, using oil, as a nice little welcome to Blighty present for ze Germans.
 

Corvus

Feathered eyeball connoisseur
I was born in Bonn to a German father and English mother, which always amuses people.
 

Nakosis

Non-Binary Physicalist
Premium Member
Didn't Jesus say ''Give everything you have to the poor and follow me, if you would be perfect'' doesn't sound compatible with capitalism to me.

imagine it folks actually did that. Then the poor, ex-poor, would be running the earth, being just as greedy as the rich were enslaving ex-rich to their needs.

Someone's got to work. Someone has to run things which means someone is going to have power over other folks.
 

Stevicus

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
imagine it folks actually did that. Then the poor, ex-poor, would be running the earth, being just as greedy as the rich were enslaving ex-rich to their needs.

Someone's got to work. Someone has to run things which means someone is going to have power over other folks.

There's no guarantee that it will always operate the same way. Not all humans are the same. We have a diverse species and a diverse planet, where some societies have been more enlightened and progressive than others. Some societies have advanced further than others, and some have become quite powerful, while others have remained behind, weak and vulnerable.

"Greed," of course, is one of the Seven Deadly Sins. Not that I put much stock in that sort of thing, but at least it has been recognized as one of the more common human failings for quite a long time.
 

Nakosis

Non-Binary Physicalist
Premium Member
"Greed," of course, is one of the Seven Deadly Sins. Not that I put much stock in that sort of thing, but at least it has been recognized as one of the more common human failings for quite a long time.

Well, I don't judge. I just accept reality for what it is.

upload_2017-7-14_9-41-37.jpeg


Whatever it is that you want, are you really going to refuse more of it?

Folks may not all want the same things but they all want something.
 

Akivah

Well-Known Member

This isn't a study, this is two guys (one is an anthropologist) that wrote an article about their opinion. I'll admit that capitalism is flawed, but what isn't? There are four types of economic systems. IMO Capitalism is the least flawed system.
Economic System Types

Traditional
A traditional economic system is one in which each new generation retains the economic position of its parents and grandparents. Tradition decides what an individual does for his living, so industry, clothing and shelter are the same as in previous generations.

Market
Market economies are based on consumers and their buying decisions rather than under government control. Government’s role is to create a stable economy for the market to operate properly.

Command
In a command economy, the government controls all economic activity. The market plays little to no role in production decisions. Command economies are less flexible than market economies and react slower to changes in consumer purchasing patterns and fluctuations in supply and demand.

Mixed
A mixed economy combines qualities of market and command systems into one. Theoretically, this system should be able to combine the best policies of both systems, but in practice the proportion government controls and response to market forces varies. Some countries rely more on market emphasis and others on state planning.
 

Lyndon

"Peace is the answer" quote: GOD, 2014
Premium Member
Well, I don't judge. I just accept reality for what it is.

View attachment 18350

Whatever it is that you want, are you really going to refuse more of it?

Folks may not all want the same things but they all want something.

Glad that we can finally put a face on who we are talking to!!
 

Nakosis

Non-Binary Physicalist
Premium Member
Last edited:

bobhikes

Nondetermined
Premium Member
Looks like, according to the article, that these countries are doing pretty good economically. So if they're leaving, it's probably not because of capitalism and all the jobs that have been created because of it.

Another win for capitalism...

Capitalism can't be all that great there still leaving so its not fixing any problems.
 

Nakosis

Non-Binary Physicalist
Premium Member
Capitalism can't be all that great there still leaving so its not fixing any problems.

Well honestly I'm all for free health care and free education since these things are IMO so important which is a suppose a socialist attitude, but you're going to need capitalism to fund them. :p

So capitalism is just private control of trade and industry. In other words you can own and control your own business. So you'd rather give control and ownership of the work you do to the government?

That's what you want or is it something else?
 

Kenny

Face to face with my Father
Premium Member
LOL Whatever, I am an atheist, that will NEVER change. Not until the last proton decays will I become a theist of any kind, I'd of course probably be dead by then.
You are a free moral spiritual agent... I support your right to believe whatever you want to be.
 

Corvus

Feathered eyeball connoisseur
Mixed
A mixed economy combines qualities of market and command systems into one. Theoretically, this system should be able to combine the best policies of both systems, but in practice the proportion government controls and response to market forces varies. Some countries rely more on market emphasis and others on state planning.
This would be more my cup of tea. Possibly with a suitable AI executive, making all economic decisions, instead of corruptible incompetent fickle humans....is he joking? not really.
 

Corvus

Feathered eyeball connoisseur
Capitalism demands we reject God and embraced this life for all it's worth, spend spend spend, accumulate possessions, drown in debt. Work til old age, then hand over your home to pay for your care, and let the cycle repeat with your children.
Debt driven economies do not equal capitalism. In a capitalist system, innovation is rewarded, as is efficiency and productivity, in all areas but those where better proficiency is had by the public sector, since profit should be the ONLY consideration of non charitable private interests (aside from complying with the law) and as such this disqualifies them on grounds of human dignity and prevention of suffering, from being allowed to contractually provide vital or key public services. IMO.
 
Top