Ah, now I see what you mean. I guess I did equate purity means truth. But is such an assertion not justifiable? How about this:
John 17:17,
Sanctify them through thy truth: thy word is truth.
So God's words are both pure and true. So after further consideration it turns out I was right. Yeah for me!
I might suggest you study the scriptures with the same astuteness with which you study my posts. I think you would be good at it.
Oh I have no quarrel with the idea that God's words should be both pure and true. But awkwardly, there is also at least one passage in the bible that says God lies, drawn to my attention by
@Good-Ole-Rebel , namely 1 Kings 22: 20-23. Or maybe we should see this as lying by proxy, like the Mafia boss telling his hitman to kill someone rather than doing it himself, so it's OK?
But none of these is saying
the bible is God's word and has to be taken verbatim. That is my point.
As for my own view, I rather incline to St John's ... "the Word was made flesh and dwelt among us..."
It seems to me perfectly ridiculous to take, for example, a semi-mythologised history of the Jews, as recited in Kings, as "the word of God" and therefore all literally true. It is an offence against reason to do that.