-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Controversial New Theory! The Scandal of the Internet! Read All About it!
- Thread starter Sunstone
- Start date
Deathbydefault
Apistevist Asexual Atheist
If you count a watered down rock with some trees as a spaceship, then yea.
Augustus
…
Pfft, stop peddling your pseudoscience. The Sun even has it's own website: http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/
It seems to revolve around a right wing populist agenda and titillating celebrity gossip rather than the so-called 'Earth' though...
s13ep
42
The view that the Earth is revolving the Sun only, is similar to the view that a dream is the chemicals only.
Those wise of themselves understand that a dream-state occurs by the chemical reactions; similar to those who're wise of existence, they understand that the Sun and planets are dualities. The Sun's revolution can be understood personally, the Earth's revolution can be understood impersonally. The Earth's revolution can be communicated, but the Sun's cannot- it can only be agreed upon- same as dream-states. This is because the Sun's revolution is above our communication ability and the communication-orientated academic laws, and the Earth's revolution isn't.
We can find communicative evidence for the Earth's revolution, but not for the Sun's. It's is the nature of things, but our nature is communication-heavy- as we talk in words. You'll not find clarity, ever, because your tongue is twisted by academic-education, supported by academicians; you'll always ping pong between clarity and confusion.
Academicians force children to neglect their dream-states to support the academic body of knowledge, and the academic mission; similar to how they force children to neglect the negative revolution of the Sun around Earth. We're taught to believe evidence-heavy observation is an arbiter of intelligence.
The result of this is the dismissal of dream-states because they are outside of the realm of academic-scientific ability, and a mutated reality where the dream-state is laughed at- where the dreamers are discriminated.
Academicians call this view of opposites pseudoscience because it's not of their singular-perspective- which is ironically, the opposed argument- also "pseudoscience".
No clarity found, negative emotions arise, negative comments fall in positive locations, and the way of nature continues the academic way.
Those wise of themselves understand that a dream-state occurs by the chemical reactions; similar to those who're wise of existence, they understand that the Sun and planets are dualities. The Sun's revolution can be understood personally, the Earth's revolution can be understood impersonally. The Earth's revolution can be communicated, but the Sun's cannot- it can only be agreed upon- same as dream-states. This is because the Sun's revolution is above our communication ability and the communication-orientated academic laws, and the Earth's revolution isn't.
We can find communicative evidence for the Earth's revolution, but not for the Sun's. It's is the nature of things, but our nature is communication-heavy- as we talk in words. You'll not find clarity, ever, because your tongue is twisted by academic-education, supported by academicians; you'll always ping pong between clarity and confusion.
Academicians force children to neglect their dream-states to support the academic body of knowledge, and the academic mission; similar to how they force children to neglect the negative revolution of the Sun around Earth. We're taught to believe evidence-heavy observation is an arbiter of intelligence.
The result of this is the dismissal of dream-states because they are outside of the realm of academic-scientific ability, and a mutated reality where the dream-state is laughed at- where the dreamers are discriminated.
Academicians call this view of opposites pseudoscience because it's not of their singular-perspective- which is ironically, the opposed argument- also "pseudoscience".
No clarity found, negative emotions arise, negative comments fall in positive locations, and the way of nature continues the academic way.
Last edited:
Erebus
Well-Known Member
No. Jet fuel can't melt steel beams. Diana was killed by the royals. The Flat Earth Society has members all around the globe.
Checkmate.
Augustus
…
The internet proved that the Queen personally killed Diana by tying her to a steel beam and burning her in a jet fuel powered auto-da-fe. Unsurprisingly the steel beam was completely unscathed and retained all of its tensile strength after the execution.
Let's see how the so-called 'experts' explain this one to the sheeple...
Last edited:
BSM1
What? Me worry?
Papoon
Active Member
No, no. The devil revolves around Donald Trump.
BSM1
What? Me worry?
Maybe that's why both are smiling.
More accurately the Earth and sun revolve around each other, but the mass of the sun is so great that the center of revolution happens to be almost at the center of the sun's mass. It does indeed practically seem like the Earth goes around the sun.