And there's something beyond existing.But primal chaos is existing. God is existing, and because God is existing, that means existence is more than God. I'm not saying to call existence God.
Because existing is true.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
And there's something beyond existing.But primal chaos is existing. God is existing, and because God is existing, that means existence is more than God. I'm not saying to call existence God.
And there's something beyond existing.
Because existing is true.
Things exist. True is abstract.But truth is existing.
That's true! And I can say that that's true, but I can't say that that exists.That's true; true is abstract, but abstract things exist as well.
But do you know what beats both true and exists?
But primal chaos is existing. God is existing, and because God is existing, that means existence is more than God. I'm not saying to call existence God.
Existence is beyond primal chaos. Nothing is beyond existence because it would have to exist, which makes it not above it.![]()
I wouldn't see much reason for reverence if their content and superior selves have no concern for helping others achieve the same.
Perhaps the process is necessary. Maybe they can't or won't force unnatural transformations. We need to evolve on our own and earn self-mastery rather than it just being handed to us. They don't want to treat us like children.
Granted they're social beings, I don't see any reason why they wouldn't have also evolved ethically, culturally, and spiritually along with the technological. Any species that fails to master their own nature would destroy itself long before reaching the omega point.
I call these beings "gods" because they would hypothetically be the most powerful and all-knowing intelligent entities in existence. They would be at the pinnacle of transcendence in every way. Plus, most other modern notions of deity are extremely vague tending to mean everything and nothing at the same time, which I don't find particularly useful.
Not sure what you really mean but find at most times what we imagine have already been imagined, researched found analysed and availble in Hindu or Buddhist scriptures.Do you think cosmic gods could exist?
The Thirty-one Planes of Existence: http://www.buddhanet.net/pdf_file/allexistence.pdf
or maybe this: http://thichhangdat.com/Introductio...x_realms/Six_Buddhist_Realms_of_Existence.pdf