Ingledsva said:
I assume you mean without genitalia?
Because the word you chose - hermaphrodite - actually means with the sexual organs of both sexes. I have heard it used lately, though, for a male that appears very female, or appears to be an outward blend. However that is not the actual original definition.
yes. i do understand that part. but i don't see how a male can be a male without genitalia and a female be a female without genitalia. if a hermaphrodite is what they are based on their genitalia then i would think a male or female is what they are based on their genitalia. seems only fair.
thanks for the other info and links.
"Hermaphrodite" is just a word that means having both sex organs. A Hermaphrodite is still in reality either a MALE, or a FEMALE, (or homosexual, which I believe should be listed as a third gender.)
The fact that they are still either Male or Female, is why they were committing suicide when doctors chose their sex for them, based on which genitals they thought were most prominent.
For instance, they forced children that were actually Males, to take female hormones, dress and live as girls, and expected them to fall in love with and marry ANOTHER MALE. If you are not a Gay male - imagine how you would feel - as a heterosexual male - being given hormones that make you grow breasts - and being told you have to marry another man and have sex with him for the rest of your life.
The sex of a child is determined in the womb, and includes brain changes, - so, regardless if something happens to prevent the genitals from forming correctly, they are still that gender. (And again - I think homosexuals - whom have remained a pretty much set percentage of world population throughout time, meaning they must have a reason for being - should be given a third gender status.)
*
*
*