cladking
Well-Known Member
History and archaeology showed that there were temples built for Inanna (Ishtar) and An (Anu), before the Sumerian civilisations, the earliest to Inanna (the Stone-Cone temple) being dated 3600 BCE.
History and archaeological evidences show that most of the Egyptian gods were mentioned in the pyramids of the 5th (Unas) and 6th dynasties (Teti, Pepi I and Pepi II, and a few other), inscribed on the walls of pyramids, written in hieroglyphs, known as the Pyramid Text.
Older pyramids (from the 3rd and 4 dynasties) have less writing inside the chambers.
But some of the Egyptian gods, such as Seth, Horus, Hathor, Neith, Nekhbet and Wadjet predated even the 1st dynasty, hence BEFORE 3100 BCE.
You are bad as other creationists here, who don't understand history, archaeological evidences and science. Why do you make positive assertions on things that you have no education in?
No, what you actually see here is the mass delusion we call pre-history. There is so little evidence it can't even be called "history" so they call it "archaeology" or "anthropology". These are all soft sciences that don't have experiment and rely on deduction and interpretation. Just calling a structure a "temple" does not magically turn it into a place to practice religion any more than praying to isis would make her real. It requires evidence to know what the ruins of 3600 BC were used for originally. We lack this evidence because we can't translate ancient writing. We assume if they used the word "Iaannan" or "isis" that it meant the exact same thing as in later times but there is nothing to prove it because the writing is unintelligible gobbledty gook. I know why it is unintelligible gobbledty gook. It is digital language and is formatted in a way that can't be translated into our analog language. "Inanna" and "isis" were not gods, they represented specific scientific theory. All words in Ancient Language were representative rather than symbolic.
Ancient Language had logical meaning. The interpretation of those words do not. The ancient "holy books", hermetic writings, etc, are interpretations of Ancient Language. Our entire culture to a very real extent is an interpretation of ancient science but this especially applies to religion and language.
Actually no one has made sense since the collapse of the tower of babel. I know I'm not either but I'm trying to communicate difficult concepts to grasp so I am speaking in absolutes. I try to use tautologies to force people to understand. I'm well aware it doesn't work.