I find it sad that nobody can post a positive discussion of anything the majority doesn't feel is right without it automatically bringing a flame. Of course I should have known as throughout history people have always been subjugated for what they believe. Years ago is was religious, people hunting those of other religions such as witchcraft. Then social topics such as what happened during the red scare, man and women on the prow for anything that might suggest communism sympathy. Soon it could be scientific beliefs, with a witch hunt for creationists. You can see it happening right now when somebody speaks aloud with creationist sympathies, and the public goes mad. Accusations fly putting into question one's character. People assume one is ignorant for believing something different about something that is in the end so trivial even in the smallest of pictures. Maybe I thought that the everybody here was above this.
People marking others off who could of been great friends to them at one point in time. All on matters so trivial that it's astounding. Nobody knows who they talk to online yet one would think everyone knows everybody. Because they treat each other like that. You assume I'm ignorant because I posted some evidence with a sketchy background. I knew this, and I'm not acting like it's not true. Am I a bad person for finding such things interesting? There are online tests on both sides that support and disclaim each evidence, but how do you know what's in them is true. Either test can be true or fake on both sides of the tracks. How can I think that any of that evidence is true? Because whether or not it's real, it's out there. And because I can't be sure I take it as simply an interesting thing.
The worst thing is I haven't taken position on any side. All I did was show creationist sympathies by posting some evidence I found interesting. I'm not even promoting it all, I just said it's interesting. In truth I haven't taken a side and I probably won't, because it doesn't matter what happened in the beginning. And to argue about things like that really is ignorant. All that matters is what is happening now, and what is coming.
I have been called a liar, that all I want to do is post lies, and people have pointed out that I may be stupid. If this is not being attacked then what is? This for something I haven't even stated that I believed. Just for the fact that I could even think it's interesting. I try to keep an open mind to all things, whether it messes with my beliefs or not. I was hoping everyone here would be more open minded, but I should have known everyone wouldn't be completely. Be mad at me if you want I don't care and it doesn't change what I think. I'll also thank those that gave me advice without being mean about it, thanks for your Patience^^
The truth of the matter is that nothing in this world can be proven. How do you know that I can see what I see? Maybe I can describe it to you, maybe I can show it to you. If the world comes to see it, does it prove what I see exists? So is fact just simply what the majority claims to be true? What if you take my word for it, does that make it fact? Do you realize how much in your life you assume to be true. How do you know if da Vinci ever really existed? No you can never truly know anything is fact, you can only choose to believe it is. And so anything has as much a chance to be right as anything else, even against the majority held belief.
So much of science and what we accept to be true is built on what the majority accepted so many years ago that truth be told science cannot be trusted completely. If one thing is found to have fault the whole system could shatter. And the system is shaky enough as it is. How did the first life come to start? Is the theory of relativity true? You know there is now growing a number of scientists that are starting to think it may not be? Where is the dark matter that should be just as common as normal matter?
What's funny is that we've been like this since history has been first recorded, and you'd think we would have evolved past this by now. Or maybe it's just coming to a head, maybe this is where we've been going all this time. As our race gets more and more involved with information it may just get worse as time goes on. Maybe as evolution suggests this will come to an ultimatum. A final between science and religion with the most fittest going on. You can tell it's building to this, you can almost feel the tension growing. It's to the point where people burst out with almost pure hatred just over who has the right belief, science or religion. I enjoy religion and I enjoy science and I don't see why it should happen like this. It shouldn't matter in the end, any belief no matter how crazy it is shouldn't incite anger.
The majority usually don't open their minds to others, maybe because those who defeat other beliefs survive; but If this is who we've become through all these years, then it makes me happy not to be counted along with the majority.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm not sure if you've heard this one but I'm quoting it from,
Unexplainable Odds
I don't know if this man is correct, I'm not good coming up with statistics. But it's interesting, and I don't say I believe this at all. Honestly the source seems alittle biased towards evolution, but as I said nothing can be certain and it's interesting. And the only reason I'm posting this is because it goes against the majority with an neat argument.
"The simplest known living organism has over 500 amino acids. When amino acids form, they are less than one-millionth the size of a human hair. When they form, they form with side groups of atoms. Scientist have found that all non-living amino acids form with 50% of side atoms on the right side of the acid and 50% on the left. This is true on all non-living amino acids. Living cells can ONLY contain amino acids on the left side. ALL amino acids found in every single living cell contains only left-sided amino acids. In the most favorable environment of scientific labs, this has never been duplicated. No scientist has ever created the left-handed amino acid that is critical to the formation of life. All amino acids always form with left and right sided atoms. If scientist in perfect conditions can't duplicate one single left-sided amino acid, how could the 500 necessary for life form by chance? The scientific odds of even one left-sided amino acid forming by chance is 10 to the 123rd power. In other words 1 chance in 10 followed by 123 zeros. i.e. 1 in
1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000, 000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00 0,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000, 000,000,000,000 Compare this to the rediculous odds of winning the lottery which is 1 chance in 80,000,000. And evolutionists say Christians have blind faith. But those are not the odds of life forming. It gets worse. That is only one of the 500 aminos necessary for the simplest life form. 20 specific aminos are needed for the simplest cell, but 500 in order for life to sustain in itself. The odds get worse. Those 500 different types of amino acids have to 'evolve' within a fraction of a millimeter of each other just to give them the chance of uniting. It gets worse. They also have to 'by chance' evolve at the exact same moment in time in a process that scientist say takes hundreds of millions of years. Elements break down the amino acids, so timing is critical. The chances of all these resources falling into place at the exact same time with the exact needed elements at the exact same place on earth within a few millionths of a millimeter of each other are 1 to the ERROR..Calculation overflow. Sorry, my Pentium doesn't have enough memory to even write the number."
Like I said so much of what we accept is fact is so shaky.
