dust1n
Zindīq
Zosteraceae
Hey, I did a really long report on dem guys! :yes:
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Zosteraceae
Do you want the Biblical description or will any old description do?
The Bible describbes plant kinds as this, "Let the earth bring forth grass, the herb yielding seed, and the fruit tree yielding fruit after his kind..."Anyone that is consistent.
The Bible describbes plant kinds as this, "Let the earth bring forth grass, the herb yielding seed, and the fruit tree yielding fruit after his kind..."
The Bible describbes plant kinds as this, "Let the earth bring forth grass, the herb yielding seed, and the fruit tree yielding fruit after his kind..."
Where are the ferns and mosses? How about plant families that contain both herbs and trees? As this is about evolution, I'm guessing that those three are supposed to be absolute kinds that can not be related.
If this is going to be a discussion about Biblical kinds then that is what Biblical kinds are. Nothing more and nothing less. It would be more informative to know how and why the discussion evolved beyond what the Bible mentions.What about the moss, ferns and the conifers? Lots of trees don't yield fruit... Gingko biloba, for instance.
If this is going to be a discussion about Biblical kinds then that is what Biblical kinds are. Nothing more and nothing less. It would be more informative to know how and why the discussion evolved beyond what the Bible mentions.
Perhaps it's just an idiom, much like when the Book of Tao says "the 10,000 things" to mean everything.Sorry, I'm trying to understand the purpose of subgrouping something if almost all of half the planet's plants don't fit into the scheme.
And if the Bible doesn't coincide with the facts of the world---it gets them wrong---then there's no telling what else it got wrong. Hardly a book to put one's trust in, for anything.Perhaps it's just an idiom, much like when the Book of Tao says "the 10,000 things" to mean everything.
Perhaps in ancient Hebrew the terms used were more inclusive than we see them today.
Perhaps the Bible isn't a science book.
Perhaps the Biblical world and the natural world do not coincide.
Sequenced plant genomes
Sequenced plant genomes - CoGepedia
Phylogenetic Tree
Tree up to date as of September 4th 2012
Sequenced plant genomes - CoGepedia
Welcome to plantgdb.org!
Tools and resources for plant genomics.
PlantGDB - Resources for Plant Comparative Genomics
We have found bacteria called cynobacteria at 3.8 billion years old. They were the first to evolve photosynthesis and is WHY WE HAVE AN OXYGEN ATMOSPHERE on Earth!!!
Perhaps it's just an idiom, much like when the Book of Tao says "the 10,000 things" to mean everything.
Perhaps in ancient Hebrew the terms used were more inclusive than we see them today.
Perhaps the Bible isn't a science book.
Perhaps the Biblical world and the natural world do not coincide.
The Bible does not discuss evolution.It seems to me to be a pretty understandable grouping of plants considering the time it was formulated. As long as these kinds aren't being used for the purposes of artificially drawing barriers between sets and saying they can't "evolve into one another," than I really don't have a problem for appreciating what the ancient description is. It's a better estimate than I would have made had I not the education and access to information as I do.
That's a conclusion you make.And if the Bible doesn't coincide with the facts of the world---it gets them wrong---then there's no telling what else it got wrong. Hardly a book to put one's trust in, for anything.
The Bible does not discuss evolution.
Believing in evolution skews their interpretation of the Bible.Indeed, it does not. It also does not provide an alternative to evolution neither. Why so many people indicate so is beyond me.
Believing in evolution skews their interpretation of the Bible.
Biblists like to hold on to things even after proved otherwise. Replacement theology, dinosaur and human prints together, the Catholic Church is the Harlot, Hitler is the antichrist. The list could go on.Well, when the Bible is taught before evolution as opposed to visa versa.
Biblists like to hold on to things even after proved otherwise. Replacement theology, dinosaur and human prints together, the Catholic Church is the Harlot, Hitler is the antichrist. The list could go on.
Every one seems to cling to some cherished preconcieved notion. "Rose tints my world and keeps me safe from my trouble and pain." -The Rocky Horror Picture ShowI go through life periodically forgetting these people exist... until I encounter one. It's a shock every time.