Creationist - what is your understanding of TOE?

[McBell]

Yeah...sure...why not?

Every time some sorry minded non-believer comes around.....
all I get is nay-saying...all for stubbornness and the last word.

Still want to say nay?

God made you do it.

That way I get to post yet another cause to believe.

It's not any fault of mine that makes you tout your faith like a banner, daring everyone to comment on it, then whining when those who disagree disagree.
That is all on you and your over puffed yet extremely fragile faith.

 

[McBell]

Wat.

Is that trolling? I honestly can't tell.

I created the universe, so there. No proof needed.

That is the beauty of faith.
You can believe any fool notion that pops into your head and then cry foul when ever someone questions your "faith".

 

[McBell]

Evolution has everything to do with faith.....God did it.

No proof needed.

There's your trump card.

It is only a "trump card" for the intellectually bankrupt.
Congrats!


You should move to Texas.
From what I hear tell, you would fit right in.

 

[Dirty Penguin]

Wat.

Is that trolling? I honestly can't tell.

I created the universe, so there. No proof needed.

Unfortunately (Thief) is very serious here. He tries to fit what we currently know of the natural world in the Old Earth Creationist (sort of) bubble by buying into the notion that the biblical description of "creation" happened over a long period of time even though that's not how their bible describes it all.

 

[RitalinO.D.]

Evolution has everything to do with faith.....God did it.

No proof needed.

There's your trump card.

Thank the lord (lol) normal people don't think this way. Even most believers require some of evidence, as shady as their evidence is.

 

[Breathe]

Well there are those Creation evolutionists...

Are those the game thing as theistic evolutionists, or something else?

 

[RitalinO.D.]

Are those the game thing as theistic evolutionists, or something else?

Could be the same thing, who knows. I attribute the term to someone who believes God created man and let him evolve as it were.

 

[LuisDantas]

Then I guess they are not the same thing. My understanding of "theistic evolutionists" is that those are people who believe that God created the world so that evolution could happen as found by Biologists. Sort of Deism applied to Biology, if you will

 

[RitalinO.D.]

Then I guess they are not the same thing. My understanding of "theistic evolutionists" is that those are people who believe that God created the world so that evolution could happen as found by Biologists. Sort of Deism applied to Biology, if you will

Ah, so by theistic evolution, God didn't actually create man, just the world? See, I learn something new every day

 

[Autodidact]

Unfortunately (Thief) is very serious here. He tries to fit what we currently know of the natural world in the Old Earth Creationist (sort of) bubble by buying into the notion that the biblical description of "creation" happened over a long period of time even though that's not how their bible describes it all.

Is that what he's saying? How long did it take for you to figure it out?

 

[Thief]

It is only a "trump card" for the intellectually bankrupt.
Congrats!


You should move to Texas.
From what I hear tell, you would fit right in.

I'm hoping to fit into heaven.
Guess you have other plans....dust.

 

[Thief]

Unfortunately (Thief) is very serious here. He tries to fit what we currently know of the natural world in the Old Earth Creationist (sort of) bubble by buying into the notion that the biblical description of "creation" happened over a long period of time even though that's not how their bible describes it all.

Try King James...one more time.

I didn't actually change a thing.

 

[Thief]

Thank the lord (lol) normal people don't think this way. Even most believers require some of evidence, as shady as their evidence is.

No shading here.
Just a brighter color.

 

[McBell]

I'm hoping to fit into heaven.

good luck with that.

Guess you have other plans....dust.

No need to be jealous.

 

[ImmortalFlame]

No need to be jealous.

Dude, I can't wait to be dust, it's gonna be so awesome!

I'm hoping to be used in a compost heap!

 

[Thief]

Such great expectations!

 

[Dirty Penguin]

Try King James...one more time.

I didn't actually change a thing.

And your point?.......

Unfortunately your biblical creation is open to multiple creative day interpretations and spouting "The King James Version" is of no use.

 

[Thief]

And your point?.......

Unfortunately your biblical creation is open to multiple creative day interpretations and spouting "The King James Version" is of no use.

'King James is of no use'......

Now there's a quote!

And my read works quite well.

So evolution doesn't include a notable redirection in the course of Man's development?

And a bunch of shepherds go about telling of a manipulation...by God....
with all the earmarks of a science experiment.

They didn't understand.....but you have the education to do so.....
and therefore.....no excuse.

You just don't like it.

 

[ImmortalFlame]

'King James is of no use'......

Now there's a quotemine!

Fix'd.

 

[Dirty Penguin]

'King James is of no use'......

Now there's a quote!

And my read works quite well.

Not your read rather your specific interpretation of the narrative. Various creationist "read" it but take it to mean something entirely different.

So evolution doesn't include a notable redirection in the course of Man's development?

Not if you start off with the hypothesis that 'man was created fully formed'....and not being able to back up the assertion with any empirical evidence.

And a bunch of shepherds go about telling of a manipulation...by God....
with all the earmarks of a science experiment.

Earmarks aren't the same as evidence. Your book makes the claim but there is no evidence available to suggest that such a procedure is possible.

They didn't understand.....but you have the education to do so.....
and therefore.....no excuse.

I understand exactly what the verse says and yet there is no evidence to suggest you can take man, clone him to produce a female.

You just don't like it.

What I like and don't like is not factored into this debate. I'm interested in any testable evidence for your claims otherwise it's just bold assertions....