Flankerl
Well-Known Member
Why say that? I don't get the joke?
There is no joke as it does not exist.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Why say that? I don't get the joke?
There is no joke as it does not exist.
That would mean I can go into a synagogue, take a sacrament from there, take it home, place it where I pray to the spirits (or to some considered witchcraft), and basically do anything I want to it. I could go to the sane synagogue and take the Torah and use the scripture for witchcraft instead.
If I asked a practicing Jew if I can take a sacrament from the synagogue and used it for witchcraft, because there is no such thing as cultural appropriation, does that mean I can take it? Would that be disrespectful or can anyone take anything from a synagogue (Church, Temple, etc), do whatever they want with it religious wise without disrespecting the sacredness of the item stolen? (or are we borrowing it?)
Another form of cultural appropriation is going to Mass, stealing the Eucharist, and consecrating the bread and wine myself. While another form is taking the Gohonzon/Dharma and mixing the Dharma with god-centered religions. Another form is, I don't know, taking a Burka and using it as a fashion statement or use it in my rituals to my family.
If there is no such thing, then doing these things are fine?
The point is taking it from the Synagogue not buying it from the store. There is a huge difference, am I right morally speaking? (Not talking about legal)But yeah you can go to Amazon, buy yourself a Tanakh and then ritually sacrifice your entire family on it. Have fun. Though the police, prosecutor and judge will somehow see that differently.
Why the **** do you want to steal stuff? Stealing is bad, even from a non-religious POV.
Stop stealing stuff or plan to steal stuff. Its not okay.
Also what the hell is a sacrament?
HAVE FUN
Please stop being sarcastic.
Is it alright for me to go into a synague during prayer if I was not a practicing Jew, stay inside the Synague and use the Torah for witchcraft prayers, and silently pray using the Torah for means of invoking the spirits because it is my faith to do so?
I have not stolen anything. I have not broken the law. Is it right according to your religion?
I do have a question for all respectful practicing Jew.
Yes you can do so. Have fun. No one on this entire planet can stop you from doing so.
According to my religion your religion is of no concern. It is not mentioned anywhere.
Sorry Carlita, it's a pretty terrible analogy. Cultural appropriation really is an idea that should be buried, hopefully sooner than later.Please stop being sarcastic.
Is it alright for me to go into a synague during prayer if I was not a practicing Jew, stay inside the Synague and use the Torah for witchcraft prayers, and silently pray using the Torah for means of invoking the spirits because it is my faith to do so?
I have not stolen anything. I have not broken the law. Is it right according to your religion?
Shall we stop writing and speaking in English, since it belongs to the English peoples?Cultural appropriation is like one of you taking a part of my family's tradition that has been held in our generation for centuries and using it as your own without respect to my family at all.
What.Pretty much. If you took the recipe of a religious food and use it in your own way, that would be culture appropriation and if you made profit from it, that's completely disrespectful. However, the article did say it's "fine" to use other cultural things as long as respect is given and maybe at the least the interest in learning what's behind the object, recipe, or dance used.
For example, I have a Yamaya statue (looks like a tourist figurine) in my home. I dont worship it and I dont give it offerings because to do so, it would have to be blood sacrifice. Also, there are specific ways to honor Yemaya as well as the spirit of Yemaya would need to be in the statue and concecrated in ceremony before it means anything at all. To put my personal meaning to it is an insult to that culture. Thats culture appropriation.
Pretty much. If you took the recipe of a religious food and use it in your own way, that would be culture appropriation and if you made profit from it, that's completely disrespectful.
However, if I took the Yemaya statue, consecrated it, and start worshiping it, then that's appropriation. I am using something sacred of another religion without respect of how the item is used in their culture. That, and they don't use Yemaya figurines as far as I know.
Using it in witchcraft rituals (if one is a witch) is another form of cultural appropriation as there is no Bible use in witchcraft (European folk traditions, rituals, and magic) and it is against the Bible.
That would mean I can go into a synagogue, take a sacrament from there, take it home, place it where I pray to the spirits (or to some considered witchcraft), and basically do anything I want to it. I could go to the sane synagogue and take the Torah and use the scripture for witchcraft instead.
If I asked a practicing Jew if I can take a sacrament from the synagogue and used it for witchcraft, because there is no such thing as cultural appropriation, does that mean I can take it? Would that be disrespectful or can anyone take anything from a synagogue (Church, Temple, etc), do whatever they want with it religious wise without disrespecting the sacredness of the item stolen? (or are we borrowing it?)
Another form of cultural appropriation is going to Mass, stealing the Eucharist, and consecrating the bread and wine myself. While another form is taking the Gohonzon/Dharma and mixing the Dharma with god-centered religions.
Is it alright for me to go into a synague during prayer if I was not a practicing Jew, stay inside the Synague and use the Torah for witchcraft prayers, and silently pray using the Torah for means of invoking the spirits because it is my faith to do so?
That would mean I can go into a synagogue, take a sacrament from there, take it home, place it where I pray to the spirits (or to some considered witchcraft), and basically do anything I want to it. I could go to the sane synagogue and take the Torah and use the scripture for witchcraft instead.
If I asked a practicing Jew if I can take a sacrament from the synagogue and used it for witchcraft, because there is no such thing as cultural appropriation, does that mean I can take it? Would that be disrespectful or can anyone take anything from a synagogue (Church, Temple, etc), do whatever they want with it religious wise without disrespecting the sacredness of the item stolen? (or are we borrowing it?)
Another form of cultural appropriation is going to Mass, stealing the Eucharist, and consecrating the bread and wine myself. While another form is taking the Gohonzon/Dharma and mixing the Dharma with god-centered religions. Another form is, I don't know, taking a Burka and using it as a fashion statement or use it in my rituals to my family.
If there is no such thing, then doing these things are fine?
Please stop being sarcastic.
Is it alright for me to go into a synague during prayer if I was not a practicing Jew, stay inside the Synague and use the Torah for witchcraft prayers, and silently pray using the Torah for means of invoking the spirits because it is my faith to do so?
I have not stolen anything. I have not broken the law. Is it right according to your religion?
unless, of course, you own the copyright or patent...then the appropriator is fair game...The problems are with theft and trespass, not with "cultural appropriation." Let's not confuse them. You are not permitted to appropriate my goods or locations, but ideas and rituals and such are fair game.
Sorry Carlita, it's a pretty terrible analogy. Cultural appropriation really is an idea that should be buried, hopefully sooner than later.
The biggest problem for so-called "cultural appropriation" is where do you draw the lines and who decides where those lines should be?
What.
I'm sorry, what?
No one owns food. It is not "cultural appropriation" if I go out and buy stuff to make Tacos, or heaven forbid, make teriyaki tacos. This is bull****. There is nothing wrong with anyone, anywhere deciding to cook something they haven't before. Instead, I would argue it's wonderful. No matter the reason.
Stop trying to take away the only thing we have that is truly universal. Everyone eats. Everyone enjoys good food. Stop trying to make that into something bad.
There is a quote by my namesake that I think is very appropriate here;
"The Christian resolution to see the world as ugly and bad has made the world ugly & bad."
You may not be a Christian, but you're succeeding on the other front.
Christianity isnt cultural appropriation. The article differientiates it from cultural diffusion where more than one culture 'naturally' mix together like the Santeria example it mentions (recalling what the article says sense Im out the house). Cultural appropriation is if I came into your house (taking out trespassig), took a well meaning item from your altar, and used it in a way opposed to your belief and/or without asking your permission to have it. Maybe that item can be bought in a store. Buying it say the Bible, Torah, Yemaya in the store isnt cultural appropriation. Its specifically talking about takingt sacred things from other communitiess in a more personal setting.No, putting your own meaning to a religious symbol is not disrespect. If it is, tell that to every Christian who's ever worn a triquetra, or to everyone who puts up a Christmas tree, every modern Pagan who makes their own sense of the gods, and every Westerner who likes yoga! If you truly believe that you're able to successfully worship that spirit without all the traditional rites, than you have every right to do that.
Not the food itself. If I went to the store and bought a lived chicken, thats not cultural appropriation. If I went to a Lukumi ceremony, snatched the chicken from their hand before they sacraficed it (taking out the rudeness of interupting their ceremony), and used it for my own needs good intentions or not, I find that direspectful. Thats cultural appropriation.No. No no no no no. Food is made up of ingredients. Meats, veggies, starches, spices, ect. Combining these natural plant and animal parts in your own new, creative way says nothing about culture and is in no way disrespectful. If you like the taste of a corn tortilla with teriyaki chicken who is anyone to tell you that you can't do that. It's food for f**k's sake! It's damned near impossible to make a descent meal without using some food from another culture. Seriously, this is just ridiculous. I will not be learning Jewish history before making my matzoh ball soup.
The figure means nothing to the culture. If I took Yemaya the cement head that has been concecrated by blood sacrifice and has the spirit of Yemaya in it and offered it ju ju beans because I feel its meaningful to me, thats CA. I find that direspectful.But if you believe something about that figure, regardless of what its inventors think, you have the right to do that. No religion today has never stolen something from someone else. Hell, that makes most Christian things disrespectful then!
If someone who practices witchcraft believes that the bible holds some form of power that they can use, then indeed the bible is part of witchcraft, at least that person's. Are you really saying that if you use something in your religious practices that someone else uses differently, than it's some horrible cultural disrespect?
I tried to ask a Jew that but she keeps disrespecting my question. I cant answer for jews but I can make an intellegent gues with Muslims. In our school, they used to have a room only for Muslims to pray in. So, I could not go in that room even though my intentions are good. Now they made it to a spiritual room. Now I can go in. I know Muslims dont own the room but the idea of going into their space and using it for my worship is cultural appropriation.Ignoring the stealing part, yes. You can. People do these things. It is part of their beliefs. Their sincere belief is that the passages and the consecrated items have some power that they can use. This power could be religious, spiritual, magical, whatever, but it is their belief. What makes their sincere belief disrespectful while the beliefs of the Jewish people are just fine?
The second paragraph I forgot to quote. Thats cultural appropriation. Not because the items are taken. Because the items are used in a manner disrespectful to that faith and people. Thats why the people you mentioned wouldnt be happy. (Im on my nook so its harder to cut and paste. Have to edit later)Two points here. First point: Sacredness means different things to different people. An object that is sacred in one way to a Jew could be sacred in a different way to a Kabalistic Occultist. Is either's view of that item's sacredness better than the other? No. Some things are also sacred to some but not another. The sacraments may be sacred to the Jew but not to the person who takes them to use as decoration. That's perfectly fine too! If we could stop people from using items we find
There it is. Above.Second point: No, if you asked the Jews, they'd obviously say no. That doesn't make it not-okay though. If you asked a bunch of Pagans if you could take a bunch of their symbols and repurpose them they'd say no too, but I doubt you're radically anti-triquetra and anti-Christimas tree. This goes for a whole host of things. Devout Hindus probably wouldn't support casual yoga, and Buddhist monks might not be too happy about your little Buddha statue. Does that stop anyone from doing it? Does it make it bad? No, and no.
Mixing religions is disrespectful now, huh? I'm guessing then that this is something you would never, ever do... oh, wait.
Yes. Because it is your faith to do so. Just like Christians can hand out their little papers. You with your beliefs about the Torah have every right to use it as the Jew with their beliefs about the Torah. Why are some people's beliefs more valid than others'?