Watching an Olympic promo the other day on curling got me thinking about its inclusion in the Olympics.
Correct me if I'm wrong---and I know someone will---but my impression of an Olympic
sport, or any "sport" for that matter, is that it should entail some kind of exceptional physical exertion or at least exertion requiring some kind physical fitness. I looked at the list of all the sports included in both the summer and winter Olympics, and really have to question the following four.
Archery: one stands motionless while drawing back on a bow string. An obese couch potato could qualify just as well as one in prime physical condition.
Shooting: same can be said for this sucker.
Curling: well, at least some of the participants move, although I wouldn't call sweeping ice with a broom particularly exerting,. . . . .and it isn't.
Golf: In as much as everyone is driven around in golf carts the only exertion is swinging a golf club now and then, something even my mother can do, and she's not in any kind of athletic shape.
Thing is, if these "sports" can be included then why not the sport of pool, or the sport of bowling, or the sport of darts?
.