Darwinism is in trouble from science

[averageJOE]

we have never seen flies turn into a dog. nobody has seen an ape turn into a man. this evolution is a hoax. I will not believe it. never. I have studied sciences and genetics for years. only microevolution exists. evolution is political correct it has no actual scientific evidence.

This post right here speaks volumes about you and your level of intelligence. No need to take you seriously at all.

 

[fantome profane]

If anyone want some fun, just google mikemikev and see what comes up.

 

[Dirty Penguin]

If anyone want some fun, just google mikemikev and see what comes up.

Yes. Very interesting and suspicious at the same time.

 

[Enai de a lukal]

If anyone want some fun, just google mikemikev and see what comes up.

Wow...

 

[Monk Of Reason]

neodarwinism is fraud and has been debunked. dr. denis noble has exposed it. creationism is more reliable.

The bit you quoted in this response on page 1 proves you know nothing about what your posting.

He was saying that Darwin's original ideas of how the process worked was flawed. New information has shown that it isn't anywhere near as simple as he had originally thought and is far more complex as we discover more facts about evolution and gain a more comprehensive understanding of how evolution works.

So he isn't saying that evolution is flawed. In fact he has stated the opposite. Apparently evolution is far stronger than ever and they have made new leaps in bounds in understanding it. Darwinism doesn't directly mean "evolution" and they are in fact not interchangeable terms.

 

[Skwim]

If anyone want some fun, just google mikemikev and see what comes up.

Thanks.

source
​