It may be the fact it is ancient tribal scripture that the 'Bible is filled with myths and very bad things.'
Actually, I agree it is problematic to justify one's belief on a selective interpretation of scripture contrary to those who wrote it believing it was a literal document from Genesis to the Book of Revelation. It is best to honestly understand the Bible in the ancient tribal cultural context at the time it was written.
In the last 15 to 17 years, I had come to realisation, that from Genesis to 1 Kings, particularly about King Solomon, none of these books were contemporary (or even near-contemporary) to any of the events that these books “narrated” about, eg the lives from Adam to Solomon.
Though it would seem like “historical accounts”, they are not historical accounts since there are no literary evidence that such texts exist between about 4000 BCE where Adam was supposedly created, to the end of Solomon’s reign.
According to the Jewish traditions and Christian traditions, Moses was attributed or credited to be the author of the first 5 books (including Genesis) of the canonical Jewish scriptures or the Old Testament.
Based on 1 Kings 6:1, when Solomon ordered the construction of the Temple, during his 4th on the throne, this verse stated that Moses leading his people of Egypt, 480 years ago:
1 Kings 6:1
6 In the four hundred eightieth year after the Israelites came out of the land of Egypt, in the fourth year of Solomon’s reign over Israel, in the month of Ziv, which is the second month, he began to build the house of the Lord.
Although, I don’t put much credence to anything written about Solomon (as I think he and his empire are myths), if the 4th of his reign were in 967 BCE, that would have meant the Israelites left Rameses (Pi-Ramesses in Egyptian, which means the “House of Ramesses”; read Exodus 12:37), that would date the departure to around 1447 BCE.
1447 BCE, would have put this date, during Thutmose III (1479 - 1425 BCE), and it would have meant Moses died in 1407 BCE (and Joshua leading invasion of Canaan, shortly afterwards) during the reign of Thutmose’s son and successor, Amenhotep II (1427 - 1401 BCE).
Thutmose and Amenhotep were respectively the 6th & 7th kings of the famous 18th dynasty (c 1550 - 1295 BCE) in New Kingdom period. The lives of both kings were contemporarily well-documented, and there were no mentions of Moses, Joshua or about the freed Israelite slaves and Joshua’s invasion of Canaan. In fact, Syria and Canaan were part of Egypt’s empire during the 15th century BCE.
Plus Rameses or Pi-Ramesses weren’t built until the next dynasty (hence 19th dynasty) in 13th century BCE, during the reigns of Seti I (1294 - 1279 BCE) and Ramesses II (1279 - 1203 BCE). Seti had named the city after his father, who was Ramesses I, the founder of this dynasty. This real city would put it at odds with Exodus 1, which narrated Rameses and Pithom were being built when Moses was born, supposedly in 1527 BCE. The real city - Pi-Ramesses have never existed in the reign of Ahmose I, as he had never built any new city.
Plus there are no scrolls, clay or stone tablets, no inscriptions of any kind, existing in the Bronze Age that would verify any of the books relating to Genesis to Joshua. None of these books are considered “history”.
Clearly, the books of Exodus to Joshua were not written contemporary to any events that supposedly happened. More likely, these books were composed during 6th century BCE, during and after the Exile. That would explain how neither the Genesis, nor the Exodus, could name a single king of Egypt. According to these 2 books, Abraham, Joseph and Moses should know the names of pharaohs, especially Moses, who was adopted by the king’s unnamed daughter (Exodus 2). So, whoever wrote Genesis and Exodus really didn’t know much about the history of Egypt.
History is something that you can verify with either contemporary accounts or something more physical, like archaeological evidence. For instances, Ahmose I, Thutmose III and Amenhotep II, each have some steles that were written contemporary to them, commemorating their reigns. Ahmose even have the names of his 2 daughters, Sitamun & Meritamun (around that time it was traditional for a reigning king to marry and have children with his sisters, both women married their brother), and neither women have adopted any Hebrew baby. That Exodus 2 couldn’t name the princess who found and adopted Moses, showed how little the author of Exodus knew about Egypt royals of that time.