If your intention is to respond to an argument, then your writing should be relevant to the subject of the argument. Not just a load of confused nonsense.
In #614 cladking claimed that the ToE is a threat to HUMANITY. I agreed and explained my reasons. Why are you involving other living organisms? The context here is the impact on humanity as evident by the observed events.
Because what you and cladking have brought up, have nothing do with evolutionary biology.
The Theory of Evolution is a biology discipline, LIIA, so it include all life form - not just human biology.
You do understand what biology mean, don't you?
In Evolution, it relates to changes of population of organisms, over time, in which genetics played a role. So if you want to talk about changes to morphology of anatomy, genes, chromosome, DNA/RNA, etc, then this would applied to Natural Selection, Mutations, Genetic Drift, Gene Flow and Genetic Hitchhiking - all known mechanisms in Evolution.
But you have brought up wars, genocide, racism and Social Darwinism, and none of these have to do with Evolution or with Natural Selection, and they also have nothing to do with biology.
None of these are biological inherent to other organism, so it has nothing to with Natural Selection. And I am not talking about that of Darwin. His theory while still have traction today, Natural Selection have been modified and updated to include things Darwin didn't know about at the time, like Genetic Drift, Mutations, DNA, RNA, molecular biology.
Biology students and biologists are not stuck with old knowledge and outdated testing techniques. We are living in the 21st century now, not the 19th century.
You do understand about progress in sciences don't you? We are not stuck in the past. Like I admired the pioneering works of Faraday and Maxwell in electromagnetism, but there are many things in the last 2 centuries that have eclipsed their knowledge.
Likewise, we are not stuck with using telescopes used by Galileo, Kepler and Newton. Our knowledge today have gone beyond what these astronomers have ever envisioned, even putting a number of telescopes in space.
Over time, we have learned new things, and hopefully we will learn more in the future.
And these works in electromagnetism and astronomy, like evolutionary biology, all fall under the umbrella of Natural Sciences.
Wars and genocides are more political and social, and have nothing to do with Natural Sciences.
Likewise, racism is a social and political subject, not biology, and not about Evolution, and certainly don't fall under Natural Sciences.
And as to Social Darwinism, SD is a sociology subject, nothing to do with Natural Sciences, like biology.
So since SD, racism, wars and genocides are social and political, then how about you and/or cladking start a new thread, instead of ranting your anti-biology subject here?
It is like you and cladking comparing orange to doorknob, they have nothing do with each other.
Worse of all, you think are smarter than the rest of us, yet you keep making misinformed claims (meaning, mistakes) and you are spreading misinformation (propaganda).
I will admit that I have made share of mistakes, and one of them forgetting that you are not a Christian, and for that, I am sorry.
But Islam and Muslims have perpetrated the same mistakes as Christian with their scriptures. In the Qur'an, it say Allah created Adam from clay and water, that just as bad as Genesis saying God creating Adam from dust.
There are no clay properties in any parts of human body. Do you even know what clay are made of?
Clay minerals are byproducts of weathered rock minerals that have been grind down into powdery form, and when it come into contact with water, developed plasticity texture. That's what clay are made of.
You will only find organic substances in clay, because some organisms have decomposed or rotted away, or some animals may have peed or pooed on the ground, thereby leaving trace elements in the clay.
Depending on what type of rocks have been weathered, most minerals originally come from feldspar from igneous rocks or from sedimentary rocks, and over time, feldspar would become kaolinite, which is the most common form of clay minerals.
Anyway the Qur'an version of Adam's creation is just unscientific as the Genesis version, both BS. The authors of both scriptures demonstrated that they have no understanding of the human body.