Well that shows that you do quote and explain mistakes when you see them. So your previous justifications for not quoting previous alleged mistakes and fallacies where just excuses, because you didn't really found any mistakes.
Of course I quote and explain perceived mistakes. That's the sine qua non of debate - rebuttal. When do you think I failed to quote an alleged mistake or fallacy? Are you referring to my refusal to find posts you say you never saw? Find them yourself.
I used the same dishonest tactic that you used with the intent and the hope that you can see how dishonest that looks. It is inapropiate to accuse others for making mistakes or fallacies without quoting the alleged mistake and explain why is it wrong. It is inapropiate when you do it and it is inapropiate when I do it.
That doesn't answer my question. I asked you what your purpose was on these threads, what you were hoping to accomplish. You seem to like this role you're playing here, but if so, I can't see what need it fills. In your position, I would have done the search and reported my findings to you. If you refused to address that, I would quit asking you for posts and just conclude in writing that you were lying as you have with me, but the difference is that you never looked. This is a very poor position to put yourself in, and a poorer choice to do so and then not let it die. Is thus what you're going for? I hope so. It's hard to believe you prefer any other outcome for this discussion but ended up here anyway. You could have been friendly. I have tried to be a friend to you, but you treat me with distrust and suspicion. Too bad.
Anyway, I'll answer for you as I think you would if you were forthcoming about your thoughts and feelings. I believe that unlike the people you "debate," you have no desire to learn, teach, or to cooperate with others. You're here just for the attention from critical thinkers, don't care what you accomplish, and have no other purpose. I'd ask you to modify that if you disagree, but you don't do cooperation. There would be no evidence that you even saw this except that now I might have embarrassed you into feeling you need to say something to make me wrong, but not necessarily.
@Subduction Zone wrote, "You need to be able to point them out and explain how they are mistakes and fallacies. I doubt if you can do that." Did you notice that I didn't ask you what you thought my mistakes and fallacies were, nor say I considered your post inappropriate? I called writing it a poor strategy without asking you why you thought my post was faulty. So what do you think you showed me there?
