Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
We have been over this. Noble claims that parts of evolution were refuted, but that was not in a peer reviewed article. You can tell that the claim was just his opinion and he is far outside of his area of expertise. His opinion does not carry much weight. You need something much stronger than a paper or two by an amateur.This is the point; the idea is regarded as axiomatic regardless of the failure of the scientific theory (The Modern Synthesis).
The theoretical framework and all the central assumptions of the scientific theory (MS) have failed and were disproved due to contradictions with the empirical evidence of latest science.
(1)
View attachment 75700
See the highlighted above and the link below. As I said in item 3, 4 & 5 in my post #5221, the adaptation process (the fact), which is erroneously called “microevolution”, doesn’t lead to "macroevolution" (the myth).
Further illusions: On key evolutionary mechanisms that could never fit with Modern Synthesis - ScienceDirect
(2)
View attachment 75701
Extended evolutionary synthesis - Wikipedia
(3)
View attachment 75702
Physiology is rocking the foundations of evolutionary biology (wiley.com)
Physiology is rocking the foundations of evolutionary biology - Noble - 2013 - Experimental Physiology - Wiley Online Library