sealchan
Well-Known Member
Four definitions of subjective vs objective...
(1) biased vs unbiased
(2) opinion vs fact
(3) values and/or morals vs facts
(4) personal point of view vs omniscient point of view
I like to use local vs general. That is subjective-objective assumes a community of knowers which have individuals capable of knowing truth. All truths are, in fact, known by individual knowers. A truth that is local or minority is subjective with respect to a truth that is general or majority. Truths with weak epistemologies also tend to be subjective even if they are majority. This is clear when one compares that general majority to an even greater set of knowers.
Truths are determined by more than one epistemology at the level of personality and cognition. Culturally there are also a wide varieties of epistemologies.
Epistemologies that "do work", that is, are able to solve individual or collective problems consistently and progressively are stronger (and therefore more objective) than those that are idiosyncratic, static or authority driven. On the other hand, a great deal of wisdom can be unconsciously contained in traditional ways of getting things done even if the individuals doing them are unaware.
So...
Local vs general (how many think it?)
Effective vs inconsequential (what can it accomplish?)
Practiced vs theoried (how many make use of it?)
...these are all ways of differentiating subjective vs objective truths.